Home Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Credit where it’s due

Wringing your hands worried about the world opinion of the U.S.? Get a load of this.

There is a certain familiarity to the concomitant series of actions and reactions when disaster strikes in the world. The US stands ready, willing and able to offer assistance. It is often the first country to send in millions of dollars, navy strike groups loaded with food and medical supplies, and transport planes, helicopters and floating hospitals to help those devastated by natural disaster.

Then, just as swift and with equal predictability, those wedded to the Great Satan view of the US begin to carp, drawing on a potent mixture of cynicism and conspiracy theories to criticise the last remaining superpower. When the US keeps doing so much of the heavy lifting to alleviate suffering, you’d figure that the anti-Americans might eventually revise their view of the US. But they never do. And coming under constant attack even when helping others, you’d figure that Americans would eventually draw the curtains on world crises. But they haven’t. At least not yet.

So it was last week. The US stood ready to help the cyclone-ravaged Burmese people. It did not matter that Burma’s ruling junta was no friend of the Americans. With more than 100,000 people feared dead and many more hundreds of thousands left destitute, US Air Force cargo planes loaded with supplies and personnel started arriving in nearby Thailand to begin humanitarian operations in Burma.

A US Navy strike group in the Gulf of Thailand sent helicopters ashore, ready to arrive in Burma within hours. Alas, Burma’s military leaders left their people to die for 10 days before finally accepting help from the evil empire. Even if the Yanks are allowed to boost their assistance to Burma, they can expect a groundswell of criticism.

Back in 2004, the Americans - along with the Australians - arrived within hours to help the hundreds of thousands of people left devastated by the Boxing Day tsunami in Asia. A US carrier group steamed towards Indonesia’s Aceh province. A second US Marine Corps strike force made its way to Sri Lanka with water, food and medical supplies.

The Pentagon spent millions of dollars sending C-130 transport planes from Dubai to Indonesia with tents, blankets, food and water. A navy chief in charge of co-ordination efforts said the US would deliver “as much help as soon as we can, as long as we’re needed”.

The resentment that comes from needing the military and economic might of the US translated into the most absurd criticism. Jan Egeland, the former UN boss of humanitarian affairs, cavilled about the stinginess of certain Western nations. His eye was on the US. Former British minister Claire Short was equally miffed, describing the initiative by the US and other countries as “yet another attempt to undermine the UN”, which was, according to her, the “only body that has the moral authority” to help.

I love moral authority as much as the next guy, but the UN’s moral authority is a mighty hard sell given that the UN club includes the most odious regimes in the world, such as Burma. And notice how the UN’s moral authority did not quickly translate into helicopters laden with food and water?

read the entire article

Comments

Spartacus.  This is the difference between US and them.  We do what we say we will do.  They (UN and liberals) talk and talk followed with more talking and eating, then do NOTHING. 

Americans - along with the Australians - arrived within hours to help the hundreds of thousands of people left devastated by the Boxing Day tsunami in Asia.

Good post.  We here in SC will not make the same mistakes that Ray and the Governor of LA did when a CAT 5 hit.  Busses sitting idle.  We have a thorough transportation plan in place and exercise it annually.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on May 16, 2008 at 05:50 am

Agreed Chief, the U.N. would make a nice “think tank” if those who are assigned there were capable of thinking. As it stands it’s just a place to send diplomats that have outlived their usefulness as well as an easy point of entry for those in the espionage business.


"we should select our leaders on principle first, electability second.”

A young man whose wisdom far exceeds his years

Spartacus on May 16, 2008 at 04:56 pm

heh, I liked Dan Collins response to the article at PW

For he’s a jolly good Satan, for he’s a jolly good Satan, for he’s a jolly good Satan . . . and so say all of us!


"we should select our leaders on principle first, electability second.”

A young man whose wisdom far exceeds his years

Spartacus on May 16, 2008 at 06:32 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.