Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

CFO of USA, Inc. says “We’re screwed.”

Mar. 5, 2007 (iTulip.com)
A 60 Minutes interview with David Walker

David Walker is an accountant, the nation’s top accountant to be exact, the comptroller general of the United States. He has totaled up our government’s income, liabilities, and future from surpluses to huge deficits and our loobligations and concluded the numbers simply don’t add up. And he’s not alone. Its been called the “dirty little secret everyone in Washington knows” – a set of financial truths so inconvenient that most elected officials don’t even want to talk about them, which is exactly why David Walker does.

“I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan or Pakistan but our own fiscal irresponsibility,”

“I’m going to show you some numbers…they’re all big and they’re all bad,”

He calls it a fiscal wake up tour, and he is telling civic groups, university forums and newspaper editorial boards that the U.S. has spent, promised, and borrowed itself into such a deep hole it will be unable to climb out if it doesn’t act now. As Walker sees it, the survival of the republic is at stake.

“What’s going on right now is we’re spending more money than we make…we’re charging it to credit card…and expecting our grandchildren to pay for it. And that’s absolutely outrageous,” he told the editorial board of the Seattle Post Intelligencer.

“We suffer from a fiscal cancer. It is growing within us. And if we do not treat it, it could have catastrophic consequences for our country,” Walker replies.

The cancer, Walker says, are massive entitlement programs we can no longer afford, exacerbated by a demographic glitch that began more than 60 years ago-- a dramatic spike in the fertility rate called the “baby boom.”

“If nothing changes, the federal government’s not gonna be able to do much more than pay interest on the mounting debt and some entitlement benefits. It won’t have money left for anything else – national defense, homeland security, education, you name it,” Walker warns.

“The prescription drug bill was probably the most fiscally irresponsible piece of legislation since the 1960s,” Walker argues.

Asked why, Walker says, “Well, because we promise way more than we can afford to keep. Eight trillion dollars added to what was already a 15 to $20 trillion under-funding. We’re not being realistic. We can’t afford the promises we’ve already made, much less to be able, piling on top of ‘em.”

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke validated much of Walker’s take on the situation at congressional hearings this year, and so did ranking Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee. Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota is the Chairman.

Sen. Conrad thinks David Walker is “providing an enormous public service.”

Asked if he agrees with Walker’s figures and his projections, Sen. Conrad says, “I do. You know, I mean we could always question the precise nature of this projection or that projection. But, that misses the point. The larger story that he is telling is exactly correct.”

Conrad acknowledges that most people in Washington are aware how bad the situation is. “They know in large measure here, Republicans and Democrats, that we are on a course that doesn’t add up,” the senator tells Kroft.

Link To 60 Minutes interview

Comments

the funny thing is that the politician or public figure who finally gives this real treatment will be blamed for the insuing hysteria when people realize there aint no money. don’t say a thing. just keep believing. have faith. it’ll be fine. we can float this… we just need… another war.

its clear this is the result of market manipulation from the left. its impossible to predict the causation of certain variables and the manner in which they play out in the long term. when one steps in to regulate or manipulate, the ripples from that artificial market manipulation go on forever… be it minimum wages or welfare or artificially low prescription prices.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 7, 2007 at 06:48 am
Avatar for marcia siegel

THIS IS WHAT THE CREDIT CARD INDUSTRY DID TO ME AND MY BUSINESS.

We are the owners of A&B Enterprises dba Fantasyline.  We had been in business for 23 years.  Our business was adult talk lines.  We have always used live operators to screen our callers and verify bank information.  We had excellent fraud control and verification procedures.  Our primary form of payment was VISA and MasterCard.  We had various merchant accounts.  Initially we had merchant accounts with banks.  At some point these banks discontinued telephone order processing and or credit card processing so we switched to third party processors etc.  Our merchant accounts never had a bad mark against them.  They were never cancelled due to chargebacks.

Our last processor was Online Data in Westchester IL.  In December 2004 they informed us that they had to switch our account.  In April 2005 they stated they could not switch our account because we sold downloadable DVD’s.  This was false.  We enclosed a letter to that effect to Online Data.  The letter did no good and Online Data informed us that due to the nature of our business they could no longer process our charges. 

Online Data recommended we contact Nelix to find a merchant account.  Nelix refereed us to ECS World UK.  This arrangement did not work out as ECS World UK failed to pay us monies owed. 

Due to the loss of our merchant account we had to close our business.  Online Data claimed that they were being forced to close all Adult Oriented Web Businesses by Visa and Mastercard International and Chase JP Morgan Bank.  Fantasyline never was a Web Business.  Closing our business abruptly caused us severe hardship.

All deprived us of our livelihood.  Aside from depriving us of our livelihood and the complications that caused, we always paid high merchant fees.

Marcia Siege

marcia siegel on March 7, 2007 at 10:01 am

The one speck of truth in this article is that entitlement social spending is financially stupid. It is expense, with little or no return.  To conflate it with economic debt is simply economic ignorance.


If life doesn’t begin at conception, why do they call it birth control?

robert108 on March 7, 2007 at 10:11 am

I’m kinda surprised that Mark is highlighting this story as it shows that the current promises made on entitlements are phony.

If things were to continue on as they currently are things would be fine.  Our economy is growing faster than the debt.  So every year the debt becomes more affordable.

However the Social Security system is a trainwreck. 

Sen. Conrad thinks David Walker is “providing an enormous public service.”

I find that very ironic when Conrad’s done as much damage to the situation as anybody in Congress.  Standing in the way of Social Security reform was unconscionable. 

There’s no amount of taxes we could pay that would keep up with the promises that Congress has made.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on March 7, 2007 at 10:13 am

TW

If things were to continue on as they currently are things would be fine.  Our economy is growing faster than the debt.  So every year the debt becomes more affordable.

Did you read the article?
Go to the GAO web site and do a little reading will ya


“We have a dollar that’s adjusting and I am for a strong dollar.....
Our dollar doesn’t buy as many barrels of oil as it used to and so therefore it’s more expensive for the American people”..... Bush 3/12/08

Mark D on March 7, 2007 at 10:33 am

Duh I read it.  The problem is the entitlements in the future, not what we’re doing today.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on March 7, 2007 at 10:38 am

Why do you think most dems were against the unfunded prescription drug bill? 55 - 44 senate.

The problem is the entitlements in the future, not what we’re doing today.

So in other words...business as usual, who cares, it’s the dems fault, hey look terrorist....oops need mo money for the war on terra
The Chinese will always buy our debt. not to worry folks.....


“We have a dollar that’s adjusting and I am for a strong dollar.....
Our dollar doesn’t buy as many barrels of oil as it used to and so therefore it’s more expensive for the American people”..... Bush 3/12/08

Mark D on March 7, 2007 at 11:01 am

Why do you think most dems were against the unfunded prescription drug bill? 55 - 44 senate.

Hypocrisy.  They want to sponsor the vote-buying social programs.


If life doesn’t begin at conception, why do they call it birth control?

robert108 on March 7, 2007 at 11:15 am
Avatar for HG

It sounds like, at some point in the near future, we either privitize SS, drastically reduce social spending, and maximize govt. tax receipts by lowering taxes, or, we may find ourselves in a financial quagmire. 

Of course the liberal answer is to reduce military spending, raise taxes, and continue to recklessly spend money on social spending and eventually impose the full dread of their socialist utopian nightmare on all of America.

HG on March 7, 2007 at 11:39 am

Why do you think most dems were against the unfunded prescription drug bill? 55 - 44 senate.

In addition to what Robert said they were against it because it wasn’t 100% socialistic.

The Chinese will always buy our debt. not to worry folks.....

Back to that old lie.  You’d think you’d come up with a new one once in a while Markee.

Once again I want to thank you for highlighting the need to reform the entitlements.  Too bad the rest of the guys on your side are standing in the way.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on March 7, 2007 at 12:35 pm

robert108, HG, TW

You talk about the social programs that the dems created and how we must cut them in order to keep the USA from going bankrupt but you keep avoiding the good ol prescription drug plan that you bozos started.

Eight trillion dollars added to what was already a 15 to $20 trillion under-funding. We’re not being realistic. We can’t afford the promises we’ve already made, much less to be able, piling on top of ‘em.”

With one stroke of the pen, Walker says, the federal government increased existing Medicare obligations nearly 40 percent over the next 75 years.

“We’d have to have eight trillion dollars today, invested in treasury rates, to deliver on that promise,” Walker explains.

Yes HG, lets lower taxes and that will increase revenue .......Hmmmmm Perhaps the first social program you cut can be the republican prescription drug plan.


“We have a dollar that’s adjusting and I am for a strong dollar.....
Our dollar doesn’t buy as many barrels of oil as it used to and so therefore it’s more expensive for the American people”..... Bush 3/12/08

Mark D on March 7, 2007 at 06:03 pm

You talk about the social programs that the dems created and how we must cut them in order to keep the USA from going bankrupt but you keep avoiding the good ol prescription drug plan that you bozos started.

You’re an idiot. The conservatives here opposed the prescription drug plan. Ironically though, it is one of the few programs in government that is actually performing below the budget. It’s amazing what a little free market can do even in a government program, isn’t it?

Yes HG, lets lower taxes and that will increase revenue .......Hmmmmm Perhaps the first social program you cut can be the republican prescription drug plan.

Fine. Let’s do it. Then we can move quickly onto Medi"care" and Social “Security”.

You need to wake up from your partisan stupor Mark.

likwidshoe on March 7, 2007 at 06:12 pm

MD: I guess you missed it, with your partisan blindness, but I said “social spending”, not “Democrat social spending”.  You made that up.  I have called for the drastic reduction of all govt social spending. Get it, now?

Let’s start with the oldest programs, the New Deal stuff(some of which is still with us), JFK’s “New Frontier”, LBJ’s “Great Society”, and all the rest.


If life doesn’t begin at conception, why do they call it birth control?

robert108 on March 7, 2007 at 06:13 pm
Avatar for HG

Yes HG, lets lower taxes and that will increase revenue .......Hmmmmm Perhaps the first social program you cut can be the republican prescription drug plan.

I’m with you there Mark.  Besides, Wal-mart has a better prescription drug program.  I can afford to buy my Grandmothers 9 prescriptions for $4 each.  For that matter, so can she—even on SS.

You’ll get no defense for gov’t social spending from me—even when it is a Republican doing it.

HG on March 7, 2007 at 06:18 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.