Home (Post) ND News Mobile Say Anything Forum Contact Register Login

Sunday, September 21, 2008


BILL CLINTON & CRONIES GAVE US MORTGAGE CRISIS

While many pundits are pointing to corporate greed and a lack of government regulation as the cause for the American mortgage and financial crisis, some analysts are saying it wasn’t too little government intervention that cased the mortgage meltdown, but too much, in the form of activists compelling the government to pressure Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into unsound – though politically correct – lending practices.

“In an attempt to increase homeownership, particularly by minorities and the less affluent, an attack on underwriting standards was undertaken by virtually every branch of the government since the early 1990s,” Liebowitz writes. “The decline in mortgage underwriting standards was universally praised as ‘innovation’ in mortgage lending by regulators, academic specialists, (government-sponsored enterprises) and housing activists.”

An article in the Los Angeles Times from the late ‘90s praised the sudden surge in homeownership among minorities, calling it “one of the hidden success stories of the Clinton era.”

A New York Times article from Sept. 1999 states that Fannie Mae had been under increasing pressure from the Clinton administration to expand mortgage loans among low- and moderate-income people and that the corporation loosened its lending requirements to comply. 

When Greg Mankiw, chairman of President Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, voiced a warning about weakened underwriting standards, he was rebuffed by Congress..

The Wall Street Journal quoted Congressman Barney Frank, D-Mass., in 2003 as criticizing Greg Mankiw “because he is worried about the tiny little matter of safety and soundness rather than ‘concern about housing.’”

Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, rejected a Bush administration and Congressional Republican plan for regulating the mortgage industry in 2003, saying, “These two entities – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – are not facing any kind of financial crisis.” According to a New York Times article, Frank added, “The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

Analysts point not to greed, but to social activist politics

And we want to put another social activist in office as our President….who’s an Anti-American Racist Socialist idiot, who will finish what Bill Clinton started! Absolutely asinine!

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Here is the actual New York Times article from Sept. 1999:

Fannie Mae, the nation’s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates—anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

…In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980’s.

’‘From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,’’ said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ‘‘If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.’’

...Under Fannie Mae’s pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000—a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on September 21, 2008 at 01:50 pm

I dunno… maybe it’s just me… but, didn’t you put the wrong part of your NYT post in bold…

Fannie Mae, the nation’s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people…


spf6ac.jpg


“Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other vews.

William F. Buckley Jr.

pparets on September 21, 2008 at 02:19 pm

No.

The new guy highlighted that part.
But where ever he is got it from conviently omitted the lines I highlighted.

I think his stuff came out of whirldnutsdaily.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on September 21, 2008 at 02:26 pm

hahahaha….  go away….


“Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other vews.

William F. Buckley Jr.

pparets on September 21, 2008 at 02:31 pm

Is this a better source…?

from USAtoday: 

Raines, the company’s former chief financial officer, Timothy Howard, and former controller Leanne Spencer were accused in a civil lawsuit of manipulating earnings over a six-year period at Fannie. Raines was appointed by Clinton, after serving as White House budget director under Clinton.

Raines’ predecessor, former Fannie Mae chief James Johnson, is a prominent Democrat who was an adviser to 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry and was selected by Obama to help vet his vice presidential prospects. But controversy over favorable loan deals he obtained with Countrywide Financial Corp., a bank seriously damaged by the mortgage meltdown decline, prompted him to abruptly resign that post in June.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/2008-07-17-fannie-freddie-lobbying_N.htm


“Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other vews.

William F. Buckley Jr.

pparets on September 21, 2008 at 02:42 pm

Home Mortgage Giant to Pay $3.8 Million in Fines to F.E.C.

WASHINGTON, April 18 — Freddie Mac, the home mortgage powerhouse, agreed on Tuesday to pay $3.8 million in civil penalties to the Federal Election Commission, which had accused it of improperly funneling corporate executives’ donations to candidates and holding lavish fund-raisers that often benefited congressmen on an influential House committee.

Freddie Mac did not contest the findings nor did it concede that it had broken campaign finance rules in most of the instances cited from 2000 to 2003. It did, however, admit to a violation involving a $150,000 donation to the Republican Governors Association that was used for last-minute get-out-the-vote efforts in 2002. The association refunded the money to Freddie Mac eight months later, after Mr. Delk asserted, according to agency records, that he had learned it was not used for general party-building purposes, as the law required.


Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

“You have absolutely no reason, none, to trust our word or our actions at this point.”

Titular gop Head Mr. Steele


realitybasedbob's signature
realitybasedbob on September 21, 2008 at 03:20 pm

It’s always fun to get sparkle and boob in the mix of any post.


‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.’ (Edmund Burke)

JazzyKat on September 21, 2008 at 03:30 pm

Pparets

And, he just loses it when he sees undeniable, irrefutable statements in print that don’t include his world-view.

Touché

Joel on September 21, 2008 at 03:31 pm

Analysts point not to greed, but to social activist politics

There may have been social activist politics, but it was greed that put $100,000,000 in Franklin Reines bank account.

MMA Grappler on September 21, 2008 at 04:36 pm

The real greed that started it all was the greed for votes that led to the social engineers mandating bad loans be made, in the first place.  No bad loans, no money for Raines and his cronies.


If govt control of the economy were the way to go, the Soviet Union would be the richest, most powerful nation in the history of the world.

Thanks to Obama, America remains the only country where it is illegal to drill our own oil!

robert108 on September 21, 2008 at 04:59 pm
Avatar for Dan

Hi,

Exactly right or should I say “left”...lol

Good old Bill started this huge snowball rolling downhill in 1003 & 1996…amd it is finally hitting the bottom of the mountain.

Truth….its a funny thing…most people do not want to hear it or beleive it.

Go figure….

Peace!
Dan

___
Obama As YOUR “Commander And Chief” OF The USA
http://iraqsinconvenienttruth.com/2008/09/21/barack-hussein-obama-as-your-commander-and-chief-video/

Dan on September 28, 2008 at 09:01 am
Avatar for rhonda

didn’t Bill Clinton sign a bill in his first term of office that would allow wall street to buy and sell mortgages and savings, after this practice was stopped with government regulations to protect the mortgages and savings after the great depression and fall of the stock markets the first time around? But Bill Clinton reversed the regulations that were protecting mortgages from this practice. And THAT is when the housing boom started. because lenders were less afraid give “ninja” loans because if they failed, they would repackage them to look like good loans and sell them on wall street, this is what really caused this problem we are facing, thanks Billary!

rhonda on October 1, 2008 at 12:14 pm
Avatar for Bob Roberts

Rhonda you are right it was the lifting of regulations separating commercial and investment banks that led to the crisis not minorities trying to get a first home mortgage. But while Clinton did sign the bill it was actually Phil Graham, the McCain campaign’s economic advisor who also said our economy is fundamentally sound and called American workers a bunch of whiners, who pushed it through and championed the banking deregulation that led to the current financial melt down.  Clinton did support it along with other Republican initiatives like NAFTA, WTO and welfare reform.  All these policies have failed us and helped to lead us into the economic crisis that we are now faced with.  Things were not great under Clinton, but have gotten exceedingly worse under Bush.  Both parties bare responsibility for the crisis, but to try and pin it on minorities getting mortgages is unfucking real to me.  This piece is a pathetic attempt to reach back and misquote an article from 1999 to construct a flawed theory that Clinton, poor blacks and minorities are responsible for the current crisis so you can justify voting for the same failed economic policies that have ruined American workers.

Bob Roberts on October 23, 2008 at 10:22 am
Avatar for dannyboy

Brickley Paiste ‘08!!!!

Free Bugs Raplin!!!!

dannyboy on October 23, 2008 at 10:33 am

Bob Roberts,

I don’t think that either you or Rhonda has any idea what you’re talking about.  But I am certainly willing to be proven wrong, if you can do so.

Please explain how, specifically, the removal of the Glass-Stegal wall of separation between retail and investment banking caused “the current financial meltdown.”

Please note that if you believe that mortgage loan were not bundled, securitized, and sold off before the legislation you’ve alluded to, you are quite simply wrong!  Both conventional (Fannie/Freddie) mortgages, and sub-prime mortgages were funded via the securitization process long before Bill Clinton took office.  Still, I’d be very much interested to hear your explanation to the contrary.


“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

Bat One on October 23, 2008 at 10:48 am
Avatar for Bob Roberts

The Commodity Futures Modernization Act allowed for the merger of commercial and investment banks but did far damage than just remove the “fire wall” between investment banks and commercial banks.  It allowed for unregulated “credit default swaps” which lead to the seizing up of the money markets and exacerbated the housing market crash, it allowed for the deregulation of energy markets which lead to the Enron collapse, and spawned a rash of mergers of commercial and investment banks.  Banks were allowed to pass on the risk with out having to report the value or potential loss of the “swaps” to investors. Particularly problematic are the “credit default swaps” that were sold to hedge against risky investments in bundled mortgages. A “swap” is different from “insurance” only in that they are totally unregulated and banks are not required to report their financial exposure or to have enough cash on hand to cover the risk that they are insuring. They used complex computer models, know as Artificial Intelligence, that the traders didn’t understand.  The creator of AI warned that the models he created were being abused and not understood by the people using them.  This is part of the problem we’re faced with today trying to figure out what all these bundled mortgages are worth.  This created a ripple effect and the result of the “swaps” was that the banks who sold them didn’t have the capital to cover the losses, and when the mortgage bundles started to drop in value the investment banks had to come up with the cash to cover the bad swaps they had sold.  This is what happens when you create an unregulated $62 trillion industry.

Bob Roberts on October 23, 2008 at 04:31 pm
Avatar for Perok

what a bunch of right wing crap…
Bill Clinton never encouraged lenders to
- offer no documentation
- 100% financing for a 620 score
- 1% neg.am mortgages
- 2 yr ARM’s
- no appraisal mortgages
etc, etc,
and for every homeowner who foreclosed, there is an investor with 5 units in foreclosure

Perok on June 3, 2009 at 03:58 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.