Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Autistic vs With Autism

Should we refer to an individual as “autistic” or “a person with autism”? Some people are very diligent about drawing a distinction between the two and making a point of saying that they will only use one. Usually they choose “person with autism”. I didn’t really care about the distinction until I started working on this post.

I’ve leaned more towards “autistic” because it is far less cumbersome to say and write. But many would argue that merely saying “autistic” de-emphasizes the personhood of the autistic individual while “person with autism” recognises that the individual is “a person first”.  I disagree with that mode of thinking.

I’ve cooked up this niffty little graphic over here to help me make my point (no wise cracks about my graphics skills please). What is it? It’s a cup. What kind of cup? It’s a red cup. Does the fact that it’s red make it any less of a cup? Not to my mind so why bother with saying something like “a cup that happens to be red” (equivalent to “a person with autism") instead of just “a red cup” (equivalent to “autistic")?

My analogy breaks down a bit because red-ness does not imply cup-ness. However, personhood is implied in the term “autistic.” It is a descriptor that is only appropriate for people while red can appropriately describe a multitude of things. “Person with autism” suggests, even though the people using the term would (I hope) deny believing such a thing, that autism can exist without personhood. That’s not something that I want to imply.

In any case, I think a more important distinction to make in how we use language in discussing autism is to recognise that people are autistic for life. Autism is not a childhood something that will fade away with time. The autistic kids that we worry about today will grow up (with that that entails) to be autistic adults each one as different from the other as snowflakes. They will still need our love, support, and compassion then. There are autistic adults today who need it now.

Sam of Uncle Sam’s Cabin.

Comments

Sam,
+
Is this really an analogy? I’ve read and reread your blog…five times now and I’m still not sure.

Personally, I prefer the most simplistic; a red that happens to be a cup.

I also prefer the most direct.


“To love is not to stare steadfast at one another...it is to look forward, in the same direction.”
Saint-Exupéry

laydownSally on April 3, 2008 at 02:36 am

It makes sense to me. The cup is still a cup whether is is red, blue, or green. A person is still a person whether they are autistic, mentally ill, or “normal.”

Samantha on April 3, 2008 at 05:59 am

Well Sam, If that was your whole point, then I agree with you.


“To love is not to stare steadfast at one another...it is to look forward, in the same direction.”
Saint-Exupéry

laydownSally on April 3, 2008 at 11:46 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.