Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Monday, March 12, 2007

AP Mourns: There Goes The Gay Neighborhood

Tim Graham

Tolerance? Diversity?  Not so much…

Liberal media outlets aren’t usually sympathetic to the story of people growing upset at the changing shape of their neighborhoods, often at the arrival of new Hispanic or Asian immigrants. But AP reporter Lisa Leff reports sensitively from San Francisco that the distraught natives who dislike the invaders are gay men are upset at the arrival of—gasp—people with baby strollers:

SAN FRANCISCO—Even on a weekday in winter, the Castro district vibrates with energy, most of it male. Men holding hands, walking dogs and lounging at cafes have long been the main attraction in a neighborhood known as a gay mecca the world over.

Yet where visitors see a living monument to gay pride, longtime community leader Brian Basinger sees a cultural enclave at risk of becoming a faded museum piece - or worse, a place where men who love men may one day feel like they don’t belong.

“When I see a stroller now, I see it as someone who evicted a person with AIDS, right or wrong,” said Basinger, president of the Harvey Milk Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transexual Democratic Club.

This is an interesting sound for people who used terms like “born-again bigots” to describe those who disagree with their “sexual orientation.” But the problem, apparently, is growing acceptance: “as gays and lesbians win legal rights and greater social acceptance, community activists worry these so-called ‘gayborhoods’ are losing their relevance.”

Lisa Leff (Lisa Left?) simply relays their anxiety that the neighborhood is becoming “Disneyfied”—that it’s losing its bohemian, sex-drenched flavor. Notice the threatening language embraced by the reporter that the “wild abandon” and sexual liberation is not the dominant culture:

Don Reuter, a New York writer who is researching a book on the rise and fall of a dozen gay neighborhoods in the U.S., has observed the same trend in cities as far-flung as New Orleans, Philadelphia and Seattle. He found “Disneyfied” places boasting chain stores, restaurants catering to a diverse clientele and “cleared of any reference to sex.”

“What makes these neighborhoods gay? Not much,” concluded Reuter, who predicts that outside New York, San Francisco and a handful of other cities, neighborhoods with a significant gay presence will not survive.

[...]

This is an interesting trend, and certainly a news story. But if the roles were reversed and gay activists were “colonizing” a formerly straight neighborhood, the AP’s tone probably wouldn’t sound like the reporters and editors were blowing their nose into a hanky with the natives.

Read the whole thing.

This story not only tears the lid off yet another area of leftie hypocrisy, but reveals the true feelings of the “gay community” toward marriage and traditional family structure in this country.
They don’t want to join us, they want to exploit us.

Comments

Gay people have often raised marginal neighborhoods real estate values.
Makes the areas safe for yuppies.

Things change.

WOOF on March 12, 2007 at 11:53 am

“yuppies"?

I guess you mean normal, traditional family people.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on March 12, 2007 at 12:37 pm
Avatar for Wolfgang

Robert108 wrote: “They don’t want to join us, they want to exploit us.”

We don’t want to exploit you, we just get tired of people trying to shove the heterosexual lifestyle down our throats.

Wolfgang on March 13, 2007 at 08:22 am

wolfgang

We don’t want to exploit you, we just get tired of people trying to shove the heterosexual lifestyle down our throats.

Unfortunately Wolfgang, this country is predominantly hetero. That means we aren’t shoving anything down your throat. We are just bahaving normally. The perception that you are having something shoved down your throat is bullshit. When someone walks a baby down the sidewalk they aren’t shoving anything down your throat. It would be ‘shoving down the throat’ if we heteros had a large parade every year, with big flags and the lot, flaunting our sexuality. We don’t do that though. Now, who does...?


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 13, 2007 at 12:37 pm

“yuppies”?

I guess you mean normal, traditional family people.

Yea right. Have you seen They Live with Rowdy Roddy Piper?


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 13, 2007 at 12:50 pm

Yeah, having babies is shoving heterosexuality down your throats.  What about Gays that push their kids around in strollers?  They shoving anything down your throat?

Justin B. on March 13, 2007 at 01:17 pm
Avatar for Dave

It would be ‘shoving down the throat’ if we heteros had a large parade every year, with big flags and the lot, flaunting our sexuality.

That sounds pretty fun. We could call it… Mardi Gras! rolleyes
Dave on March 14, 2007 at 12:45 pm

Dave
Are you nuts? You know how many fegs are involved in Mardi Gras? Don’t roll your eyes at me, pooch.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 14, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Avatar for Wolfgang

Sparkie wrote: “It would be ‘shoving down the throat’ if we heteros had a large parade every year, with big flags and the lot, flaunting our sexuality.”

You hets have been doing that quite a bit with your anti gay marriage rallies. And I recall a lot of complaining when “Brokeback Mountain” was in theaters about how “Hollywood is turning gay,” never mind the fact that at least 98% of films are hetersexually themed. I’ll be nice and not lump you in with that church in Kansas that demon-strates at milltary funerals, holding signs that say “God Hates F--s.”

Wolfgang on March 14, 2007 at 01:25 pm

God does not hate you, Wolf, It is at best ambivalent to your existance.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on March 14, 2007 at 01:42 pm

Wolfgang

You hets have been doing that quite a bit with your anti gay marriage rallies. And I recall a lot of complaining when “Brokeback Mountain” was in theaters about how “Hollywood is turning gay,” never mind the fact that at least 98% of films are hetersexually themed. I’ll be nice and not lump you in with that church in Kansas that demon-strates at milltary funerals, holding signs that say “God Hates F--s.”

I don’t give a shit what others do generally. I just am not going to stand here with my hands in my pockets while you accuse us hets, me included, of shoving our sexuality down your throat. Its a bunch of crap. I’ll be nice too and not lump you in with the provocative guys wearing assless chaps and making out and spanking each other at those parades I mentioned. Still, your accusation is crap. I am perfectly comfortable in my sexuality… i.e. I feel no psychological need to assert it in public. Whether or not others think I am hetero has no relation to whether or not I actually am. Gays, it strikes me, are so goddamn insecure that they need to wear assless chaps in public, spank each other, and make out so that the public at large and themselves are convinced they are gay. Same thing with the guys talking like girls. OK, you like to fuck guys. Big deal… why talk like a girl? None of the homosexual men I know talk with a lisp or in a high pitched tone of voice at all. They don’t participate in gay pride parades either. They see it as demeaning to homosexuals and counterproductive to the cause of becoming generally accepted in society. Bottom line is that people who are comfortable of their sexuality don’t have a need to show it off like that. They have no need to shove anything down anyone’s throat. Those who are uncomfortable, be they hets or homos, make big signs, talk shit about fags, talk with a high pitched tone of voice, et cetera. I think the best thing for the gay community to do is to become more secure in their sexuality. When they no longer feel the need to make overt efforts to buttress their sexuality in public due to personal doubts or whatever… we’ll all be better off. Homos and hets alike.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on March 14, 2007 at 02:09 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.