Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Sunday, July 13, 2008

and now for a post without the f-word in the title

There is a presidential election coming up, duh, that we’ve all been unfortunately fixated on for days and days. The candidates, all of them, have been busy phishing, trying us out, testing the water, licking their fingers and turning to the wind, lying, telling the truth, whining, dining, and so on. This time we’re down to two, as usual, neither of whom is that distinguishable from the other. They are liars, flip-floppers, demographic whores, cosmeticized empty suits being jiggled around by the various insidious forces hidden behind the curtain jiggling the strings, all of whom know what’s best for you before you do.
There is lots of blame handed around. Many of us pick up on lies, puff, falsities and run with it. The other guys do, why can’t it hurt our side? While it is understandable, there is so much puff out there it’s almost unavoidable, but there is a sense in which we can do better. Hunter Thompson advocated ‘gonzo journalism’, a form of journalism where the reporter refuses an attempt to purge the article of his presence. This form of journalism is now prevalent, but unfortunately so many of us prefer all of our preformed, theoretical truths that we latch onto whichever form of it agrees with our sensibilities and advocate the underlying bias as fact, pointing to the distortions on the other side, and neglecting the gonzo aspects of our own sited sources, news articles, slander, and whathaveyou. From all sides there is a call for civil discourse. It is only a masked way of ruling out and stigmatizing those views which differ from our own. This is true of both parties, the MSM, the blogs, and everyone else commenting on the situation. We are all gonzo, but we’ve missed the 2nd order reflection need to appreciate it.
And what about being asked to step outside of our preformed theory? What of being asked to be responsive to empirical evidence? Again, there is no clarification we can garner, without work we are mostly unwilling to do, things we are unwilling to read. We come to the plate with a filter we were knitted as younguns, only able to consume foods that are square and fit through the square hole.
We are explained the seriousness, told our opinions are valued, and lied to… all the time, from all sides of the political fray. The people in the city hate the people in the country, and conduct themselves with little care or thought, the people in the country hate the people in the city, and so on. Believe it or not, in sparsely populated areas, people can conduct government for themselves. This truism is neglected. It is dangerous. Look around to your state governments and ask how many give the people on the ground real control over their own situation? Hardly any. Those that do are busy wrenching the power from the localities. And we see the Fed doing the same. This is a bipartisan issue. It is of grave importance and strikes right to the heart of what this whole wonderful experiment of a country is about.
The cities are different. The people feel powerless to affect their own situation, let alone those of others. Daily life is intermeshed with so many other parties that the reciprocal dichotomy is undeniable. Yet, in these large crowds, one’s power is diminished. Voting in a town of 10,000 and a city of 14,000,000 are inherently different. And so these differences need to be appreciated and acted on. If city folk which to wipe the arse of every last person as they feel powerless and ambivalent in the situation, let them. But let the localities do what they want. Period. Don’t bar them from doing things that don’t agree with your baggage, just advocate to be in more control of your own situation. That has nothing to do with Federal advocacy. Nothing at all.
And this election is dark, no matter who you are, when it comes to being able to self determine. The infrastructure is crumbling we are told. Unfortunately, by the time the infrastructure is rebuilt, unless it’s done locally, the Fed will have even more decisive blackmailing power. They come to states, make sweet offers, and eventually the state has the Fed’s extremity up its arse and the Fed is telling it when to breathe and when to buckle its seatbelt. Literally. They steal our money, mismanage it, and steal more. They do ‘projects’ for us, then steal more and more. Federal ‘projects’ are bad, they create a physical inroad.
Vote ‘none of the above’ in November. That’s all I can recommend. Don’t pay attention to the candidates. We deserve better and both of these candidates have laid bare the fact that they are willing to do a lot to get into office, anything really, and we know that neither one of them wants to empower the localities, to empower the people… in a bona fide manner. They sure do love to trick us into thinking things! Don’t let emotional or moral issues cloud your judgment. Structural issues come first, and they protect all of our abilities to self determine. That’s the check and balance we cannot loose. When we watch the talking heads, the nationally syndicated ‘private’ news that sits at the Feds toilet, licking and licking the stains… we do a grave disservice to ourselves. I extend that to any national news service. Investigative reporting is expensive. Businesses like it cheap.

Go sit on the carpet and wait for scraps in Washington; I’m not paying you to figure anything out, just to repeat in step.

Evil shit.

Comments

More narcissistic, nonsensical navel-gazing from the usual source of such drivel.


Leftie political philosophy, from a DU commenter:

It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. RUMOR IS TRUTH. The modern laws of media hype and political warfare have a useful tenet: Repeat ANYTHING or raise false concern over ANYTHING and it is likely to be planted in the conscious/subconscious of many voters.

robert108 on July 13, 2008 at 05:35 pm

Sparkie,

Next time I’m up north, I’d like to stop by and sample whatever it is you’ve been smoking.  Should make for one helluva weekend!


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on July 14, 2008 at 07:56 am

sparkless-arse-fuckin-buckle,

Physician, heal thyself.


Out Here
Rodney G. Graves

Ceterum censeo Parthia esse delendam
Latin: “Furthermore, Parthia (Persia aka modern day Iran) should be destroyed.”

Rodney Graves on July 14, 2008 at 08:07 am

Sparkie,
Too much here to respond to comprehensively, but you have some good points here. As you may have noticed, some dont have the slightest idea what your talking about, others deny so their small little viewpoints and narrow ideas are not threatened. The big point seems to be that both sides are more interested in power and building voting blocks and manipulation of the masses than actually solving problems and being honest, and most people who take the time to be informed end up being willing partners in a game of manipulation and power consolidation at the cost of independent thought and common sense. This is true, has always been true, and will continue to be true.

And what about being asked to step outside of our preformed theory? What of being asked to be responsive to empirical evidence

This is the normal state of most people. Some are smart, some are not so smart, but everybody suffers from this malady, you, me even idiot dimwit robert108, although he may truly be the king of this particular condition. Robert108 is a nutbag, so his opinions are generally disregarded as the ravings of an obsessed buffoon. Anyway, I digress....

Hunter Thompson advocated ‘gonzo journalism’, a form of journalism where the reporter refuses an attempt to purge the article of his presence.

HEY MAN, DONT GO BLAMIMG HST for this shitstorm of incompetence in the media..lol..Is Led Zepplin to blame for Night Ranger or Lover Boy? Are The Beatles to blame for Culture Club?  I think not my friend...the ones who come after a revolution usually are just not that talented, but they dont know it.

We are explained the seriousness, told our opinions are valued, and lied to… all the time, from all sides of the political fray. The people in the city hate the people in the country, and conduct themselves with little care or thought, the people in the country hate the people in the city, and so on. Believe it or not, in sparsely populated areas, people can conduct government for themselves. This truism is neglected. It is dangerous. Look around to your state governments and ask how many give the people on the ground real control over their own situation? Hardly any. Those that do are busy wrenching the power from the localities. And we see the Fed doing the same. This is a bipartisan issue. It is of grave importance and strikes right to the heart of what this whole wonderful experiment of a country is about

I would have put this differently, but it is true, any group that can be pitted against any other group are fare game to be manipulated for others purposes without the knowledge that they are being manipulated. In fact, this is the basis for all politics.

Vote ‘none of the above’ in November. That’s all I can recommend. Don’t pay attention to the candidates

Tough to argue with from an emotional point of view. The truth is, even though I am convinced that the voting system has purposefully built in flaws, even though there are many out there who would make it as hard to vote as possible, even though it is possible to rig elections, even national elections, even though the candidates we are asked to choose from are usually far from the cream of the crop, if we do not choose one or the other, we are doing exactly what they want us to do. To vote none of the above is to admit that you have given up on the system. It says “I will lie down and take whatever you give me”. This is what “they” want.
The better choice(not a good choice, but then again, most choices we make are the lesser of 2 evils) is to vote for the person you dislike the least and then accept that this country, this world, is what it is: corrupt to the bone. Given that fact, try to understand that change happens over generations, not election cycles, and in the long term maybe this will be balanced by fact that each generation has a different idea of whats right and whats wrong.
Good concept Sparkie, but dont expect to many to understand it.

“People believe what they want to believe”

dragon poker on July 14, 2008 at 04:06 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.