Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Monday, February 12, 2007

An Open letter To The National Organization Of Women (NOW)

In my latest post to the Louisiana Conservative I ask NOW a few pertinent questions about their lack of interest in the bestial way women are treated in Islam:


Dear NOW,

I was wondering if you could answer some questions for me. I was just perusing your web site and I saw that you take a stance on many issues, from teen contraception to endorsing Hillary Clinton for president. I see that you’re calling for an end to the war in Iraq. I see that you endorse minimum wage and Roe vs. Wade. It looks to me that you champion women’s rights related to a variety of issues. That being said I have some questions:

I was just wondering why I don’t see you saying anything at all about the women of Islam. I guess that the only assumption would be that you don’t know they can’t vote. And, did you know that in many places they can’t own property? Did you know they can’t drive? Did you know that they themselves are little more than property in many cases?

Did you know that under the much touted Sharia law the woman has virtually no rights, not even to leave the house without being covered from head to toe and looking through a slit in a hood, a little like a cross between Cousin It and the Black Knight from Monty Python?


Did you know that punitive or revenge gang rapes are common, or that in Palestine right now if a man isn’t with the Hamas program his wife is stripped naked and forced to walk through the public streets to humiliate him. Not her. Him.

I give several more examples of the single minded misogynistic brutality women face every day in the Islamic world such as beatings and stoning, and the general degradation they're faced with, then I end up with this:

I haven’t heard one single peep from you on this stuff. What ever happened to “I am woman, hear me roar!” I’m not even hearing you squeak on this subject, much less roar.

Can it be that you save all your roaring for safer targets, like the white male majority of this country? They aren’t likely to call you racists or bigots if you speak out on behalf of their women, are they? They’re safe. Terrorists like to call targets that can’t or won’t fight back “soft targets.” Is the American male a soft target for you?  Is Islam and its misogynistic, brutal treatment of its women too big and scary of a target?

Just asking.


Think anyone will answer me?

Read the whole thing at http://louisianaconservative.com/

By the way, Jeff Blanco just put up this site and he’s still working on it. It’s new, with not as many bells and whistles yet as some of the more developed sites. It’s gonna get better.

Comments

Pil: IMO, the purpose of the American feminist movement was not to add to the state of women, but to divide the American population along gender lines.  If that is true, it would certainly explain their silence on the abuses of women under Islam.  They just don’t care, like the “enviros” don’t care about the Arabian desert as a “fragile ecosystem” that needs their protection.  They just want to drive a wedge between one group of Americans and another group of Americans.  What do you think?


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on February 12, 2007 at 10:01 pm

Absolutely,

Feminsim is the Bolscheviks’s Women’s Auxilary.  Look at the roots of Feminism and you will find Marx.  You are spot-on as to its purpose.  And it has been wonderfully effective: half of US marriages end in divorce; Europe is not replacing itself and is being supplanted by Third World immigration; Japan is suffering the same fate.  Ironically enough, the source of all this is suffering Blowback—the former Soviet countries are having a tough time making marriage work, as well as normal population replacement.

Basically, they told women to take the pants and channel changer from the men—and the men aren’t buyin’ it.  Result, the old rivalry between men and women has broken out into a full-blown War between the Sexes. 

We’ll all lose on this one, because we need each other.


...for great justice

Move_Zig on February 12, 2007 at 10:55 pm

r108,

I think you’ve hit on part of it. I just have to wonder, if their real agenda is the protection and equality of women, how they can conveniently ignore what’s happening in the Middle East.

This is another fine example of liberal blindness. What do they think will happen to them if Islam becomes a world force? Liberals - and especially women - will pay a very heavy price.


The future ain’t what it used to be.....

Pilgrim on February 13, 2007 at 05:28 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.