Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

An alternative view of the captured Iranian ‘terrorist facilitators’

A report in today’s Independent newspaper, highlights why the Iranians would want to kidnap the 15 British sailors and Marines.
The botched US raid

that led to the hostage crisis

Exclusive Report: How a bid to kidnap Iranian security officials sparked a diplomatic crisis

By Patrick Cockburn

Published: 03 April 2007

A failed American attempt to abduct two senior Iranian security officers on an official visit to northern Iraq was the starting pistol for a crisis that 10 weeks later led to Iranians seizing 15 British sailors and Marines.
Early on the morning of 11 January, helicopter-born US forces launched a surprise raid on a long-established Iranian liaison office in the city of Arbil in Iraqi Kurdistan. They captured five relatively junior Iranian officials whom the US accuses of being intelligence agents and still holds.
In reality the US attack had a far more ambitious objective, The Independent has learned. The aim of the raid, launched without informing the Kurdish authorities, was to seize two men at the very heart of the Iranian security establishment.
Better understanding of the seriousness of the US action in Arbil - and the angry Iranian response to it - should have led Downing Street and the Ministry of Defence to realise that Iran was likely to retaliate against American or British forces such as highly vulnerable Navy search parties in the Gulf. The two senior Iranian officers the US sought to capture were Mohammed Jafari, the powerful deputy head of the Iranian National Security Council, and General Minojahar Frouzanda, the chief of intelligence of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, according to Kurdish officials.



This article sheds a completely different light on the basis and motives of the US raid. Kidnapping Iranian officials is not acceptable, whether we agree with their policies or not.

The two men were in Kurdistan on an official visit during which they met the Iraqi President, Jalal Talabani, and later saw Massoud Barzani, the President of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), at his mountain headquarters overlooking Arbil.

“They were after Jafari,” Fuad Hussein, the chief of staff of Massoud Barzani, told The Independent. He confirmed that the Iranian office had been established in Arbil for a long time and was often visited by Kurds obtaining documents to visit Iran. “The Americans thought he [Jafari] was there,” said Mr Hussein.

Mr Jafari was accompanied by a second, high-ranking Iranian official. “His name was General Minojahar Frouzanda, the head of intelligence of the Pasdaran [Iranian Revolutionary Guard],” said Sadi Ahmed Pire, now head of the Diwan (office) of President Talabani in Baghdad. Mr Pire previously lived in Arbil, where he headed the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), Mr Talabani’s political party.

The attempt by the US to seize the two high-ranking Iranian security officers openly meeting with Iraqi leaders is somewhat as if Iran had tried to kidnap the heads of the CIA and MI6 while they were on an official visit to a country neighbouring Iran, such as Pakistan or Afghanistan. There is no doubt that Iran believes that Mr Jafari and Mr Frouzanda were targeted by the Americans. Mr Jafari confirmed to the official Iranian news agency, IRNA, that he was in Arbil at the time of the raid.

In a little-noticed remark, Manouchehr Mottaki, the Iranian Foreign Minister, told IRNA: “The objective of the Americans was to arrest Iranian security officials who had gone to Iraq to develop co-operation in the area of bilateral security.”

US officials in Washington subsequently claimed that the five Iranian officials they did seize, who have not been seen since, were “suspected of being closely tied to activities targeting Iraq and coalition forces”. This explanation never made much sense. No member of the US-led coalition has been killed in Arbil and there were no Sunni-Arab insurgents or Shia militiamen there.

The raid on Arbil took place within hours of President George Bush making an address to the nation on 10 January in which he claimed: “Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops.” He identified Iran and Syria as America’s main enemies in Iraq though the four-year-old guerrilla war against US-led forces is being conducted by the strongly anti-Iranian Sunni-Arab community. Mr Jafari himself later complained about US allegations. “So far has there been a single Iranian among suicide bombers in the war-battered country?” he asked. “Almost all who involved in the suicide attacks are from Arab countries.”

It seemed strange at the time that the US would so openly flout the authority of the Iraqi President and the head of the KRG simply to raid an Iranian liaison office that was being upgraded to a consulate, though this had not yet happened on 11 January. US officials, who must have been privy to the White House’s new anti-Iranian stance, may have thought that bruised Kurdish pride was a small price to pay if the US could grab such senior Iranian officials.

For more than a year the US and its allies have been trying to put pressure on Iran. Security sources in Iraqi Kurdistan have long said that the US is backing Iranian Kurdish guerrillas in Iran. The US is also reportedly backing Sunni Arab dissidents in Khuzestan in southern Iran who are opposed to the government in Tehran. On 4 February soldiers from the Iraqi army 36th Commando battalion in Baghdad, considered to be under American control, seized Jalal Sharafi, an Iranian diplomat.

The raid in Arbil was a far more serious and aggressive act. It was not carried out by proxies but by US forces directly. The abortive Arbil raid provoked a dangerous escalation in the confrontation between the US and Iran which ultimately led to the capture of the 15 British sailors and Marines - apparently considered a more vulnerable coalition target than their American comrades.

The targeted generals

* MOHAMMED JAFARI

Powerful deputy head of the Iranian National Security Council, responsible for internal security. He has accused the United States of seeking to “hold Iran responsible for insecurity in Iraq… and [US] failure in the country.”

* GENERAL MINOJAHAR FROUZANDA

Chief of intelligence of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, the military unit which maintains its own intelligence service separate from the state, as well as a parallel army, navy and air force



This was essentially a raid on an Iranian Consulate and a clear breach of international law. It can’t be justified by saying “Well, they stormed our Embassy in 1979!”

If the Iraqi Kurds are correct in their assertion that the US is supporting Kurdish separatists fighting Iran, it flies in the face of the ‘War on Terror’ as the US is still funding paramilitary organisations (as long as their goals are the same). Articles on this issue are here and here.

The Kurds, one of the US’s main allies in Iraq condemned the raid, see here and here.

Comments

Limey, MoD should come clean about the numbers of Iranian nationals its forces have captured inside Iraq, and the amounts of Iranian manufactured munitions and weapons supplied by Iranian government to terrorists inside Iraq.

The first instance reported was by the BBC in 2004, north of Basra.

Does Mr Cockburn happen to mention that in any of his reportage?

As for the Iranians capture in their “liason office” in Arbil, has it been mentioned that Arbil lies within the major smuggling corridor that Iran is using to move weapons and personel and IED components into Iraq? And that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Officers captured are listed by INTERPOL as known terrorists?

Perhaps Mr Cockburn could address these very minor points in his next pro-terrorist propaganda piece.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on April 3, 2007 at 04:09 am

2H9

Officers captured are listed by INTERPOL as known terrorists?

Hmmm. Maybe we just abducted them so Halliburton could sit down and have a business dinner with them. Since when do we give a crap about who INTERPOL has on its wanted list? In fact, I just posted on how we entrust plane loads with 200,000 AK-47s to people wanted by interpol, only to have the guns stolen.

Perhaps Mr Cockburn could address these very minor points in his next pro-terrorist propaganda piece.

Its hard to take the guy seriously with a name like that.

Personally I think if you are an intelligence person, for any country, of seniority, you had better watch your ass and know that more than a few countries are probably going to be salivating over the chance to capture you, no matter what. The idea that one country should let spies run around loose in their country or one they are controlling IS FUCKING INSANE ON THE FACE OF IT. What? Is that what this reporter is implying? Let the spies go. Let them do whatever they want anywhere in the globe. Plays nice with the suicide vest smugglers now.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on April 3, 2007 at 05:12 am

If the MoD aren’t saying how many Iranians they have captured, how do you know that any have been caught? All searches I conducted on ‘British capture Iranian nationals’ using three separate search engines didn’t turn up anything.
I can’t find any reference to the names of the captured Iranians, perhaps you could tell me and then I can check your claims.
All searches on Iranian weapons seized in Iraq indicated no clear link to the Iranian government as the source. All suggestion of Iranian government involvement was speculative.
You need to back up your accusations or they could seem hollow.

As suggested there is smuggling between Iranian and Iraqi Kurdistan, but not of weapons for the Shiite insurgency. The Kurds have been persecuted by successive Iranian (and Iraqi and Turkish) regimes and would be unlikely to encourage instability in Iraq, when they live in perhaps the most stable region of Iraq.

This was found here:

If the Iranian Revolutionary Guards are smuggling weapons into Iraq, it is more likely to be happening through the southern border crossing areas of Mehran and Basra, which connect large Revolutionary Guard infrastructure projects with majority-Shi’ite, pro-Tehran southern Iraq. Any arms smuggling happening through the Kurdish areas is more likely to be Kurdish-orchestrated and private, rather than government-led.

However, your claims are supported by this article, though it is still speculative.

For an alternative view of news on the Middle East, see here for streaming of selected news broadcasts from around the region. Worth a look, as it isn’t just Arab news (Israeli news is also shown).


Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

ManofFireandLight on April 3, 2007 at 06:06 am

Plays nice with the suicide vest smugglers now.

I have been unable to find evidence of suicide vests coming from Iran.


Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

ManofFireandLight on April 3, 2007 at 06:08 am

I have been unable to find evidence of suicide vests coming from Iran.

Ok. But besides the point. It is widely known that Iran is attempting to undermine all of our efforts in Iraq. They should have only a few bureaucrats, having been finely combed over by us, in an office in Baghdad. Besides that I feel they are operating as their own risk. Granted Iraq is a plethora of semi-autonomous regions that play musical chairs depending on where we can send troops… still I feel their presence in Iraq is an at-your-own-risk type of activity. Britain is just pissing and moaning over a few casualties of war that are still alive. They are being toyed with by an ass that we are out trying to undermine. What the situation needs is a ‘smash and grab’ of large proportions. I am generally opposed to such things, but that little ass in Iran is gaining way too much traction through this newspaper bombing.


rasberry

Sparkie Arbuckle on April 3, 2007 at 06:27 am

Limey, BBC and AsiaTimes and Khaleej Times and Daily Star have all run articles over the last 3 years that have noted the capture of Iranian Nationals by British forces within their zone of operations.

As for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Officers captured in Arbil, that is exactly what they are. Not Electrical engineers. Not Doctors. Not Elementary School teachers. They are operating in the Arbil region for the sole purpose of keeping that northeast corridor in play.

There is a large non-Kurd population that is currently being pushed out of the traditional Kurd region, Sunnis that were placed there by Saddam in several waves of settlement aimed at driving the Kurds out and dispossesing them of rich farmlands and oilfeilds. The Iranians are trying to make common cause with these Sunnis against the Kurds, something you would think quite easy in this situation.

And yet it was the Sunnis that sold these terrorists to the Kurds, who in turn called in the Coalition Forces to make the capture, thus not angering the general populace of either group, and rubbing the face of Iran in the joub into the bargain.

This is not a cricket or rugby match, where all the players wear coloured, numbered jerseys so everyone can tell on which side they are.

I am not being facestious or snarky when I tell you to take a long hard study of Britannia’s history in this region. Not just with the Ottoman Empire, this specific region and these specific groups. The names may change, yet the song and dance card remain unchanged.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on April 3, 2007 at 05:18 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.