Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Monday, December 11, 2006

American Taliban

A few weeks ago I saw a sad video of a little girl from Gaza who was rehearsing for her parents her hatred of Jews and Americans. She rehearsed how they (The Jews) were pigs and apes.

It was horribly sad. I thought, it’s going to take a great deal of reprogramming to get that child to even be partially accepting and adapted into the world at large. Or she will be marginalized and maybe die a homicide bomber.

Then I saw this video. An 8 year old child. Indoctrinated by the hate speech of the left.

I only have one question. True or False. The Taliban is alive and well in America. Destroying young minds with hatred and evil. If you think this is OK for this child to spew this kind of hate the liberal left routinely spews, you are a sick person.

Comments

Avatar for Rob B.

That little girl is wrong. The reduction of telomeres during Dna duplication is a larger cause of death through out history. I say the liberals need to focus thier ire on genetics. Down with the genes! Down with 5 to 3 directional lagging!

Rob B. on December 11, 2006 at 11:58 am
Avatar for goprairie

Do you ever check your facts before you go off on one of these rants?  It is a film made to promote an alt. rock band.  You know, one of the evil far left segments of the evil far left entertainment industry.  It is not what you are trying to make it out to be.  It is unfortunate for you that it mentions some truths about the evil that has been done for the sake of religion throughout history.  But it is not what you are trying to make it out to be.  Chill.

goprairie on December 11, 2006 at 12:22 pm

An 8 year old child. Indoctrinated by the hate speech of the left.

This is exactly, precisely what that sick video is.

Promotional film or not, it is child abuse.

Ken McCracken on December 11, 2006 at 12:24 pm

Ken: With the lefties, it’s all about excuses and justification.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 11, 2006 at 12:38 pm

When parents take their children to work, isn’t that a form of indoctrination as well? Even if this were a legitimate video, where two liberal parents have forced their liberalism on their child--it doesn’t look like it is--how is it significantly different when two Catholic parents force their Catholocism on their young child?

Our court systems will be inundated with these “child abuse” claims, Ken.

Dave_Comet on December 13, 2006 at 08:38 am

...how is it significantly different when two Catholic parents force their Catholocism on their young child?

More mind-numbing leftie false equivalency.  Now, passing on your family values to your children gets demonized.  If anyone doubts that the lefties are out to destroy the American family, here is the proof.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 09:12 am

Now, passing on your family values to your children gets demonized.

Yes. Didn’t you read the subject of this thread? Why, Carrick said it was child abuse! Gene compared it to the actions of the Taliban!

I’m not the only who demonizes parents who pass their family values on to their children. Maybe you should redirect your faux outrage.

Dave_Comet on December 13, 2006 at 09:36 am

As usual, Dave, you can’t seem to think straight.  You make a laughable equivalence between brainwashing children to be murdering terrorists and parents who pass on their religious values to their children, as if there is any similarity between the two.  If you did read the subject of this thread, you didn’t do it with comprehension, but then I’m used to this from you.
Happy trolling.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 09:46 am

Ah, you didn’t watch the video. I suspected as much.

The girl criticized the Republican Party, religion, and Bill O’Reilly. She--very surprisingly--did not advocate performing any acts of terrorism.

Dave_Comet on December 13, 2006 at 09:53 am

Well, Dave, you lefties tell us that the terrorists are entitled to practice their murderous ways for those very reasons that she recites, but you deny that she is being set up to be a terrorist.  Strange disconnect.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 10:02 am

Dave: Of course, you dodge the entire issue of making an equivalence between the hate speech this little girl has been taught and the passing on of family values in a Catholic family between the parents and their children.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 10:05 am

Of course, you dodge the entire issue of making an equivalence between the hate speech this little girl has been taught…

Now, I thought her parents were “brainwashing (her) to be (a) murdering terrorist”. What happened? Now it’s just “hate speech”? What happened to the “murdering terrorism”???

I didn’t dodge it at all. If you have a problem with parents forcing their children to recite propaganda, it’d make a helluva lot more sense to start your search at a Sunday School then on YouTube.com. More “victims” at a church.

Dave_Comet on December 13, 2006 at 10:21 am

Now, I thought her parents were “brainwashing (her) to be (a) murdering terrorist”. What happened? Now it’s just “hate speech”? What happened to the “murdering terrorism”???

I clearly explained this, so you still need to read with comprehension, I see.

Well, Dave, you lefties tell us that the terrorists are entitled to practice their murderous ways for those very reasons that she recites, but you deny that she is being set up to be a terrorist.  Strange disconnect.
robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 02:02 pm

Once again, you try to equate terrorist hate speech with the teachings of the Catholic Church done by families.  Or are you changing the subject again?
In any case, you are wrong, as usual.  You are a deeply ignorant antiChristian bigot.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 10:26 am

You are a deeply ignorant antiChristian bigot.


You’re a deeply ignorant antiSecular-Humanist bigot. It’s wrong for parents to force liberal/atheist ideas on kids, but it’s right as rain to force conservative/Christian ideas on them? 

I realize you are large and contain multitudes, but seriuosly man. At least try to maintain a small level of consistency.

Dave_Comet on December 13, 2006 at 10:32 am

It’s wrong for parents to force liberal/atheist ideas on kids, but it’s right as rain to force conservative/Christian ideas on them?

In the first place, Dave, despite your pollyanna attitude, all religious teachings are not equal, and so your equivalence stance is wrong.  Teaching hate is not equivalent to teaching love.  In the second place, the whole concept of “forcing” is yours and yours alone.  I never said this little girl was forced to do anything.  She absorbed those teachings of hate in much the same way that children of Christian parents absorb the teaching of love, which is the basis of Christianity.  It’s not the method; it’s the message that counts.  What part of that don’t you understand?
BTW, Dave, a foolish consistency is the sign of a weak mind.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 12:39 pm

I never said this little girl was forced to do anything.

You said she was “brainwashed.” Pissing contest.

Now explain how two Christian parents teaching a child to hate homosexuals is different from two secular parents teaching a child to hate priests.

Dave_Comet on December 13, 2006 at 01:11 pm

You said she was “brainwashed.” Brainwashing is limiting the available information to that which agrees with the objective of the brainwashing.  Forcing involves force.  Duh. Pissing contest. Don’t project your life on me, Dave.

Now explain how two Christian parents teaching a child to hate homosexuals Christian parents don’t generally teach their children to hate homosexuals; in fact, if they’re doing it right, they don’t mention homosexuality at all. is different from two secular parents teaching a child to hate priests. That little girl was taught to hate a lot more people than just priests.  You fail to think clearly, once again.  I’m really sorry I have to explain such elementary stuff to you.


Hope and change, in a free world, are the private possessions of motivated individuals.

robert108 on December 13, 2006 at 02:04 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.