Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Saturday, April 14, 2007

America was founded by Sodomites?

Elizabeth Marquardt at FamilyScholarsBlog reports:

[emphasis my own]

Letter to the New Yorker from famous AIDS activist Larry Kramer (Apr 16, 2007 edition, ltr not online).

“Jill Lepore, in her piece regarding Jamestown as it approaches its four-hundredth anniversary, writes, ‘It is a story of some lessons painfully learned, and others not learned at all.’ (”Our Town,” April 2nd). To that statement I would add, ‘and the most important lesson of all hardly recognized to this day.’ In his book, “Sexual Revolution in Early America,” Richard Godbeer, a professor at the University of Miami, writes, ‘Jamestown was initially an all-male settlement…Male colonists outnumbered women by roughly six to one in the 1620s and by four to one in later decades…It is difficult to believe that a group of young and notoriously unbridled men remained celibate for an extended period of time. It seems likely that some male settlers deprived of female companionship would have turned to each other instead…[and] reasonable to assume that much of the sex…was sodomitical.’ My research for my own work-in-progress, “The American People: A History,” has revealed not only that male-only partnerships were quite in evidence but that services were often conducted to join the partners ‘under God’ and, of equal interest, that they adopted Indian children to raise as their own. I hope it will not be long before scholars will acknowledge that Jamestown was in fact not only America’s first colony but also its first homosexual community.

Larry Kramer

New York City

Further proof that these people will say anything to get laid…

Comments

Historical revisionism is an earmark of the Left, as Orwell pointed out in his novel 1984, where his protagonist Winston works in the Ministry of Truth, altering the past by stuffing inconvenient articles from the past down the Memory Hole.

Heck, the TV series Quantum Leap, where the protagonist constantly was sent back in time to right wrongs (which incidently always seemed to skew decidedly Left) was a Leftist wet dream.

This latest effort follows the trend.

By way of illustration, I give you a major effort at historical revisionism that kicked off a couple years back.

Michael Bellesiles of Emory University was the author of the book Arming America, which contended that private gun ownership was far less common in early America than often supposed, thus casting doubt on the interpretation of the Second Amendment championed by the National Rifle Association and others as a protection of individual private gun ownership. He was widely and predictably praised, winning acclaim as a skillful debunker of right-wing mythology from groups like the Brady Center for the Prevention of Handgun Violence and receiving the prestigious Bancroft Award.

The only problem was, his book was wall to wall lies, and the lies were exposed under the withering fire of peer review.

While the Left had repeatedly been exposed as liars in the fields of environmental protection and domestic violence, this affair was notable because its thrust was to go back in time and lie.

Taking another tack, homosexuals have repeatedly tried to mainstream themselves by finding homosexuality in every-day characters. 

At one point, in response to a commercial which showed Pop-Eye and Bluto as best friends, sodomist groups hailed it as Pop-Eyes’ coming out—until the creators disavowed the meaning the sodomists were trying to attribute to them.

Not even SpongeBob was safe.  Agains homosexuals hailed him as a not-so-closeted character vis-a-vis his buddy starfish Patrick.  Again, the original creator had to come out and say, no, not at all, Sponge Bob, if anything else, is child-like in his innocence and completely asexual.

Even their oft-cited allegation that the population is 10 percent homosexual is vastly overinflated. It is more like 1.5 to 3 percent (as if that isn’t bad enough)

I strongly suspect that this is yet another lie.  More Leftist wishful thinking, couched as a theory.


...for great justice

egpzpj.jpg

Move_Zig on April 14, 2007 at 11:13 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

Apparently the fact that a great part of the early Jamestown experience included “starving”, and that hence many settlers were not exactly going to be in top shape for sex, evades this, um, “eminent” historian.  He also seems to neglect the fact that many Englishmen married Indian women.

Robert Perry on April 16, 2007 at 01:12 pm

Most of the early colonists were either single or left their wives behind because life as a colonist was difficult.

It is like saying that sodomy occasionally occurred on sailing ships or in prisons.  Good for them.  Good for the citizens of Jamestown.  If I was dying of starvation and there were no women around and it was cold enough at night and…

nah, I still wouldn’t go back door on some dude.

Justin B. on April 16, 2007 at 05:11 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.