Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Abraham Lilncoln - Amerricas First And Only Dictator?

I’m amused by those that say that president Bush has abused our rights comparing him with Hitler while cast adulation on Lincoln who affectively threw The Rule of Law and the Constitution under the bus as he establish martial law over the entire country.  Some of Lincolns many dictatorial transgressions from the book ‘When in the Course of Human Events by Charles Adams

. Called up the militia without Congressional appoval. The Feds had no standing army at that time. The border states separating the south from the north refuse to send troops.

. Initiated a blockade of southern seaports again without congressional approval.

. Suspended Habeus Corpus which affectively established military rule

. Shut down dissenting newspapers and imprisoned their editors.  Actually all persons who criticized the war were subject to military arrest and imprisonment without trial or trial in military courts.  During the course of the war, an estimated 20,000 were imprisoned. 

. Arrested many of the Maryland state representatives and then rigged the replacement election to ensure that the state stayed in the union. 

. Issued an order to arrest Chief Justice Taney for his decision opposing the suspension of habeus corpus.  Fortunately the order was never carried out.

How was one man able to do all this making the nation as a whole bow down to his rule?  The obvious answer is that he as commander in chief was in control of the military.  If this could be done at a time when the Federal government was relatively weak as compared with today’s Federal government, how much easier it would seem to be today for the president to establish total control.  On that question it would seem prudent that we carefully consider who will be our next president.

Comments

There may even be a parallel here with Lincoln’s time, if you think we are teetering on the brink of a civil war.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on June 8, 2008 at 09:14 am

robert, considering how the country is split on ideological grounds, anything is possible.  However the threat of a civil war did not justify Lincolns acts but in fact pushed the nation into a war that was not desired by large faction on both sides.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on June 8, 2008 at 09:24 am

dd: I find it difficult to make such a judgment about times that were very different from the one in which I live.  My perspective on the CW is that it was the first test of the Tenth Amendment and federalism, and we failed that test.  I consider FDR’s imperial Presidency far more harmful to our founding principles, but then that’s my perspective.  I think Lincoln could have(and should have) used economic sanctions to make slavery unprofitable, but who knows?  What happened happened, and I find it hard to find any lasting damage from Lincoln’s specific acts, unlike FDR’s, which are very much with us today.


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on June 8, 2008 at 09:37 am

Not the only dictator.  See the section on Woody Woo (Woodrow Wilson) in Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism.  FDR’s subsequent excesses largely pale in comparison…


Out Here
Rodney G. Graves

Ceterum censeo Parthia esse delendam
Latin: “Furthermore, Parthia (Persia aka modern day Iran) should be destroyed.”

Rodney Graves on June 8, 2008 at 10:12 am

robert, rg, you do have good points.  In imprisoning Japanese Americans, FDR did something similarly to Lincoln except FDR had the approval of the Supreme court.  I think that Wilson did the same to protestors of our involvement in WWI.  However I think their tyranny was not at Lincolns level since they never did a blanket suspension of habeus corpus or declared martial law as Lincoln had; nor have they been deified like Lincoln.

As an aside, the civil war was not initiated over the slavery question but was based on the unfair taxes (tariffs) placed on the south.  The south resented the tariffs and the north did not want to give them up.  As time went saving the union became prominent.  The abolishment of slavery was more a political ploy than a humanitaritian action.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on June 8, 2008 at 11:53 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.