Home (Post) Mobile Authors Say Anything Register Login

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

A Rather Good Op-Ed in Today’s Washington Post:

In Praise of Evangelicals

Comments

Whether or not that’s true, these evangelicals—Bible-believing and socially conservative—are redefining social justice.

Yes they are… is it any wonder the extreme left hates true Christianity?  Evangelical Christians in this country have always stood between liberals and their society of moral irrelevance. Sadly though, I wonder for how much longer!

Diogenes - The Cynic of Sinope on November 8, 2006 at 09:55 pm
Avatar for Chad

It’s sad that in this day and age there are people still left who ingore science in favor of a two thousand year old Jewish fable.

Chad on November 9, 2006 at 09:12 am

It’s sad that there are those who persecute religious people precisely because of their morality, and use “science” as an excuse for their brutality and immorality.  Shame on them!


Save America; boycott the MSM.

robert108 on November 9, 2006 at 09:16 am
Avatar for Bat One

What’s “sad” is that so many of those who call themselves “democrats” are anything but democratic.  They are instead closet autocrats, as quick to dismiss and disparage the beliefs and liberties of others as they are to insist sanctimoniously on their own privileges.  Their primary principle, indeed, their only principle, is expediency. And we may all be sure that when a Democrat makes an accusation, it is only to cover the fact of his own, self-same transgression.

Liberals and their forced sacrifices for the so-called “common good” are the real neanderthals of human societal evolution, and the sooner their odious hypocritical ideology dies out the better.

Bat One on November 9, 2006 at 09:26 am
Avatar for Chad

I hardly think that a book which promotes slavery and murder is in any position to claim moral superiority.

Chad on November 9, 2006 at 09:30 am
Avatar for Bat One

Chad,

You are free to believe what you choose, however wrong-headed that may be.  Just so long as you don’t impede that same freedom of choice for others.

Its the “others” part that always seems so difficult for those on the left to swallow.

Bat One on November 9, 2006 at 09:37 am
Avatar for Chad

Really? Because I thought it was the “others” part that Republicans had a hard time with? Isn’t “survival of the fittest” and “individualism” what you’ve been preaching all this time?

Democrats and Liberals want to include everyone equally, and sometimes, in cases where that would be unreasonable, that means including no one. It just doesn’t make sense to have references to every single magical diety in the sky listed in the Pledge of Allegiance, so maybe it’s a good idea to put it back the way it was.

Chad on November 9, 2006 at 09:46 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses. Confirm your email address here.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.