Say Anything Blog

I hope some upstanding churchy folk were paying attention to the last case that this social worker outlined.

I guess it’s better that those LIBERAL FAGGOTS not be allowed to give a safe home to an HIV-positive baby because GOD knows all those homophobes will be breaking the door down with excitement at the prospect of welcoming an AIDS baby into their righteous family-value laden home.

Great fucking rant.  I just needed to add to it.

First, unless you are a Social Worker in our savage, morally decaying world or in Law Enforcement, you cannot understand how the filth you encounter daily, while having to walk a narrow, ever changing politically correct line is terribly frustrating and discouraging, and I hope this letter of rage helped this angry lady feel a little better.

I hope some upstanding churchy folk were paying attention to the last case that this social worker outlined.

Now you got to engage in some pro-homosexual and anti-Christian nonsense because of this letter, I hope you feel better. It was a twofer for you!

Surely a kind, supportive and stable home is much better than where these children were living, even a homosexual home. That does not mean that it is the best alternative, only the most expedient in a very untidy world, wherein genuine, loving Christianity is not being practiced as it once was, and those that are truly living that creed are increasingly being hated by society, as we are swiftly moving, at last, as state policy, to cast of the opiate (Christ) of the massses that keep them from fully partipating in our new, imcreasingly atheist, wholly secular and socialist America.

We, as a society have cast off our moralk inhibitions, especially in the sexual realm, we are becoming altogether corrupt and diseased beyond all hope of a cure; and when we at last are inheriting the wind of the evil seeds we have sown, we are quick to blame thse same Christian moral/social values and their proponents, as our scape goat for all pir social ills. Hardly fair or in service of the truth, but any other coures would result in a national repentance and that will not happen.

I am NOT implying above that atheism and socialism are always tied at the hip.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

The social worker spoke The Truth.  Finally.  Shall I add just a small sample of the disgusting things that these people with no moral compass corrupt their children with?  Why not.

The 4 year old girl who walked up to the policeman who came to answer a neighbor’s call stopped a foot in front of him and unzipped his pants.

Or the mother who held down her daughter so her boyfriend could rape her.

More disgusting things caused by Godless living.

Communism is evil

First, unless you are a Social Worker in our savage, morally decaying world or in Law Enforcement, you cannot understand how the filth you encounter daily, while having to walk a narrow, ever changing politically correct line is terribly frustrating and discouraging,

Yep.  Only two segments of the population have ever encountered the sewer of society.  is this a contest?  Okay, you win.

Now you got to engage in some pro-homosexual and anti-Christian nonsense because of this letter, I hope you feel better. It was a twofer for you!

It’s a valid pet peeve of mine and it wasn’t necessarily anti-Christian.  I said “churchy”, you wrongly assumed Christian.  As usual, it seems that Christians are quick to claim a bloody nose in debates about the rightness or wrongness of alternative lifestyles.  I guess the truth always hurts.  And what in the hell makes you think that being anti-homosexual and a Christian makes one’s opinion the one RIGHT point of view?  I don’t recall my comment beginning with “Neiman” so step the fuck off the self-righteous and offended bandwagon.

More disgusting things caused by Godless living.

I’d blame some fucked-up parenting before I dragged God into it.

Parents who have a moral compass, or follow some concrete rules of living such as the Ten Commandments seem to raise children who do not engage in the beforementioned disgusting activities.  If you would like to examine some scientific research, we can go there.

You, in my opinion have put the cart before the horse.  Those who follow God and His guidance are much less likely to engage in, or teach their children to lie, steal, prostitute themselves, or cheat.  Their children are much more likely to learn the work ethic, marry, stay married, be happy, be devoid of sexually transmitted diseases, have steady jobs, own their own homes, and help their fellow man.

I say the above after observing three generations over 29 years, having taught about 10,000 students and visited many of the homes in the community.

Communism is evil

It’s a valid pet peeve of mine and it wasn’t necessarily anti-Christian.  I said “churchy”, you wrongly assumed Christian.  As usual, it seems that Christians are quick to claim a bloody nose in debates about the rightness or wrongness of alternative lifestyles.  I guess the truth always hurts.  And what in the hell makes you think that being anti-homosexual and a Christian makes one’s opinion the one RIGHT point of view?  I don’t recall my comment beginning with “Neiman” so step the fuck off the self-righteous and offended bandwagon.

My, my, are you a little menstrual today! 

We all respond to the words used by the writer, sometimes not being able to read the true intent, as very few of us use the best possible words to convey our true meanings, and that unfortunate fact leads to many misunderstandings. I readily admit now that ‘churchy’ can have a different meaning. Nonetheless, your further comments in the quote above seems to betray a meaning much closer to the one I sensed at the begining than the one you now offer.

what in the hell makes you think that being anti-homosexual and a Christian makes one’s opinion the one RIGHT point of view?

What kind of a Christian would I be if I didn’t think that the Bible represents the RIGHT, or correct point of view of all things? I can hardly speak as though Scripture might be wrong in some matters or my belief in the strong clear words used is not correct, can I? Most Christians are Christians because they believe God’s Word is Perfect in all respects and we trust our lives to our best interpretation of those words and our desire (not whether we always succeed) to live by them.

I don’t recall my comment beginning with “Neiman” so step the fuck off the self-righteous and offended bandwagon.

So, let me get this straight, only if your comments address someone by a specific name, are we allowed to respond to them? Who made up that rule?

Next, it is a sad fact of life that if anyone speaks of their Christian beliefs in a direct, confident manner, people, as it appears you have, enjoy dragging out the “self-righteous” label, as if that ends all debate on the matter. To be self-righteous in the manner you use the word, I would have to be believe I possess, by my own efforts, a righteousness that is superior to the righteousness of others, which accusation you cannot objectively prove by anything I have said in my previous comments. For your Christian education, which you appear to sorely need on this point, ‘righteousness’ in God’s Divine economy simply means that anyone having accepted Jesus as their Savior and Lord are by that act of faith, ‘in right standing with God as regards any Divine Judgment. It does not ever imply a superior spiritual state of being more right than anyone else.

As usual, it seems that Christians are quick to claim a bloody nose in debates about the rightness or wrongness of alternative lifestyles.  I guess the truth always hurts.

When did I claim a bloody nose or any personal offense, please enlighten me?

anti-homosexual

Again, you have made a statement in gross ignorance of the facts. No true Christian is ant-homosexual, in Christ we love all human beings and desire God’s blessings on their lives. Yet, as His Word condemns homosexuality (the act), among many other sins, we too must condemn homosexual relations (the act), while never rejecting or hating the homosexual (person). I expect you to reject this, but it is ‘hate the sin and love the sinner.’

Lastly, I was not offended at all by anything you have said, you simply chose to read my words that way; but rather, like anyone else here, I simply used your comments, as I understaood them, as a springboard to make further comments on the topic of this thread.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Yep.  Only two segments of the population have ever encountered the sewer of society.  is this a contest?  Okay, you win.

These were examples of people directly involved in such cases, not the entire freaking list! As Chief RZ will tell you, teachers are also directly involved, but I did not exclude them as meaning they were not.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman.  Thanks, and also for that clarification that is sometimes or oftentimes misconstrued by non-Christians, namely the term righteous.
Today’s sermon also helped to clarify that other misused phrase, “All things are possible to him who believes.” Mark 9:23

Communism is evil

Save it, Neiman.  This was not just discussion, it was an attack:

Now you got to engage in some pro-homosexual and anti-Christian nonsense because of this letter, I hope you feel better. It was a twofer for you!

I responded in kind.

Hate the sin, love the sinner?

Why is homosexuality a sin?

Because YOU say so?

What crap.

Why is homosexuality a sin?

Because YOU say so?

No, because God says so!

That is what makes it a sin - God condemns it; but it is also perverse, harmful behavior from a non-religious, natural point of view.

Of course, if you reject Christianity and its Jewish history, you can say it is not a sin, that is your right and you are free to live that way if you choose, although you have no right to demand anyone agree with that point of view. However, it is impossible to read the relevant passages in Romans, Chapter One and come to any other conclusion but that God calls it not only a sin, but those that ‘choose’ to engage in it, He gives them over to its complete dominion (control) until and unless they see it as sin and repent.

This was not just discussion, it was an attack:

You can choose to interpret it any way you want, that does not make it so! I must have hit a nerve and I assume you are either a homosexual or a very Left Wing Liberal that believes in extreme ‘tolerance’ of any behavior, no matter how perverse or debased. These facts, if either are true, does not mean I have any ill feelings toward you whatsoever, nor do I want anything but for God to help you see the Truth, to bless and save you.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Look how much authority knee-high-man wields!

No, because God says so!

also, can we get some clarification here:

it is also perverse, harmful behavior from a non-religious, natural point of view.

i don’t think that so-called ‘naturalists’ are going to be concerned with your normative vocab, itl above. i just don’t see how you can claim all these points of view. God’s and the naturalists’… all in one paragraph. You spew stereotypes and arcane epithets. Get a pulpit there, Rev Knee-high-man Wright! You have some hate to express, no?

Sparkless:

Look how much authority knee-high-man wields!

How am I expressing or weilding any authority by simply repeating what the Bible tells us? You don’t like the idea that God calls homoexuality a sin, your argument is with Him, not me, I am just repeating what He has written.

I just don’t see how you can claim all these points of view.

Why? Homopsexuality is both a violation of God’s Creative Design and a clear perversion of natural design. You simply cannot argue against God’s declaration of His condemnation of such perverse use of the human body as He designed it, and even a complete moron can see that; for instance, the rectum and lower intestine were not designed for the repeated, forceful introduction of a penis or any other external tool, the vagina was so designed and when properly used results in procreation and continuation of the human species.

You know Sparkless, two things that appear different on the surface can both be equally true!

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman.  Well put.  I, too was a bit shocked that the gang of folly-men wanted to have sex with the man!  Then the homeowner threw out the concubine.  The raped her repeatedly and killed her.

Would an atheist deny that this event occurred?

Communism is evil

Homosexual-- So, they wanted to have sex with the man.  Were they homosexuals?  But they “settled” for the woman?!  Debased behavior indeed.
The Truth.  I had occasion to listen to a homosexual talk at a lounge once.  He said he had HIV or AIDS, I can’t remember.  He danced by himself in a provocative manner attempting to lure some men.  A few hours later, he was trying to get into a car containing four women.  They told him to go away.
These people are lost.  Their only hope is a saving relationship with Jesus Christ.

Communism is evil

I assume you are either a homosexual or a very Left Wing Liberal that believes in extreme ‘tolerance’ of any behavior, no matter how perverse or debased.

You assume incorrectly on both counts and therefore make an ass of yourself.  Twice.  Three times if you count your asinine point of view with regard to your invisible friend.

Harvey by any other name…

Abbadon:
You need to take ChiefRZ’s advice - “[Your] only hope is a saving relationship with Jesus Christ.”

You simply cannot hold the positions you claim to hold and not be either a homosexual and/or a flaming liberal. Your denial is just hot air friend.

your asinine point of view with regard to your invisible friend. Harvey by any other name…

As to my “invisible friend,” it will sad indeed when you one day, maybe sooner than you expect, face Him and He asks what you did about Jesus while in this life. There will be no excuses then, no pardon then, just the horribe knowledge that He came to you many times in your life and you rejected Him to your eternal peril.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

The experiences of a drug-addled crack whore negate Christian and other religious objections to homosexual adoption?  Say what?

Master’s degree in social work, F in logic. Whatever.

Dunno that you’ve got to be in social work to appreciate the depravity of man, either.  If you cannot catch the drift by, say, reading the paper...well, there’s another difficulty with logic, I dare say.

Bike Bubba:
Maybe you missed this line from my first comments:

Surely a kind, supportive and stable home is much better than where these children were living, even a homosexual home. That does not mean that it is the best alternative,

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Abbadon:
You need to take ChiefRZ’s advice - “[Your] only hope is a saving relationship with Jesus Christ.”

I think you need to pull your heads out of your collective Christ-addled ass-brains and realize that not everyone in the world gives a rat’s ass about Jesus.

I know it’s a harsh reality, but try to wrap your brain around the concept that not telling others how to live is a good starting point for being tolerant of others.

Neiman, I was actually responding to the original post, not necessarily your comments.