Say Anything Blog

The 9th?!  What do you expect from California?  No adjective describes them.

Communism is evil

Appointment for life.

The 9th?!  What do you expect from California?  No adjective describes them.

Damn Raygun appointed judges...well, what did you expect?

Excuse me, you were saying?

Appointment for life.

They can be removed for crimes, although this is unlikely to be one.

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

rbb:  Touche’ Now, go away.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

If adult porn was a crime than San Fernando Valley would need the largest jail in the world.  I

I know...they are all around my shop...everywhere!

Excuse me, you were saying?

The 9th?!  What do you expect from California?  No adjective describes them.

How about Americans...how about the American state which has given more American soldiers lives to bushs’ war.

Why do you hate Americans RZ?

Excuse me, you were saying?

Kozinski is a Reagan appointee and considered one of the court’s more conservative members.

So, Reagan appointed one of the court’s more conservative members and the Democratic governors gave us the really left wing moonbats? Thanks for the clarification, boob!

Barack Obama: All hat and no cattle since 1997!

how about the American state which has given more American soldiers lives to bushs’ war.

Typical of the lefties.  When a lib gets into trouble, just blaim Bush.  It’s his fault for one reason or another!

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

When are you going to enlist, tough guy?

Excuse me, you were saying?

What does that have to do with anything moron?  You are the one who can’t come to grips with liberal judges who are running porn sites!

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

Dougee:  In fairness, Kazinski was a Reagan appointee.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

Poor disillusion preppy elite gop wannabe.

Do you know who appointed the porn judge?

You would have if you read this post from the begining...or at the very least gooled his name...like I did...to find out just who he is.

Excuse me, you were saying?

opps...I forgot diminutive

Excuse me, you were saying?

What does the person that appoints a judge have to do with that judge’s morality?

RBB is a fucking idiot.

What does that have to do with anything moron?  You are the one who can’t come to grips with liberal judges who are running porn sites!

He wasn’t liberal.  He wasn’t a liberal.  He worked for Reagan’s election and in the White House counsels office before being appointed to the Federal Bench by Reagan.  He is a conservative jurist.

and diminuitive would have been the final, ultimate insult.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

I honestly don’t care who appointed him.  I think he should be out of office that our federal judges should have a level of character above this crap.  I think he is responsible for his actions, not Reagan.  You know personal responsibility and all that.

Poor disillusion preppy elite gop wannabe.

good one rbb.  That one really hurt, lol.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

I honestly don’t care who appointed him.  I think he should be out of office that our federal judges should have a level of character above this crap.  I think he is responsible for his actions, not Reagan.  You know personal responsibility and all that.

Poor disillusion preppy elite gop wannabe.

good one rbb.  That one really hurt, lol.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

I honestly don’t care who appointed him.  I think he should be out of office that our federal judges should have a level of character above this crap.  I think he is responsible for his actions, not Reagan.  You know personal responsibility and all that.

Poor disillusion preppy elite gop wannabe.

good one rbb.  That one really hurt, lol.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

Actually, Lestat, I think the guy is a libertarian, based on his writings.

I happen think this whole meme of whose party somebody is from is just dishonest crap.  The Republicans are totally screwed in 2008, but it has nothing to do with them being intrinsically more immoral than you Democrats.

If any of you guys were intellectually honest, you’d admit that.  But RBB is just feeding the swamp.  Change we can believe in I guess.

What does the person that appoints a judge have to do with that judge’s morality?

So you will have no questions about the morality of the judicial appointments of the next Dem President...good to know.

And of course you had no questions about the judicial appointment of the last Dem President I’m sure…

Excuse me, you were saying?

but it has nothing to do with them being intrinsically more immoral than you Democrats.

I completely agree Carrick.  That is why I don’t want to be an elite GOP like little rbb thinks.  The republicans have been handed a perfect chance to take this election and they are throwing it away.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

The republicans have been handed a perfect chance to take this election and they are throwing it away.

That is so precious!

Excuse me, you were saying?

Actually, Lestat, I think the guy is a libertarian, based on his writings.

And a conservative based on his judicial decisions. 

I personally don’t think he political affiliation has anything to do with his website, but why are you only pointing this out to me and not pparets or Dougie?  They were trying to smear liberals by associating him with us.

If he was a conservative then my bad, see I can accept that a conservative does something bad and am man enough to admit my mistakes.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

Dougee: 

The republicans have been handed a perfect chance to win this election and they are throwing it away.

Don’t judge the situation by what you hear on SAB, Dougee.  There are some here who would be happy to see the republicans and McCain lose.

But in the real world, there are many, many prominent conservatives, republicans and independents who know that Barack Obama must be defeated and that McCain is the man to do it.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

I completely agree ppartes and McCain will get my vote.  I just wish McCain wouldn’t be against drilling in ANWAR and off the coast of Florida.  This could be a homerun for him and would really help McCain against Obama in November.

As a conservative, I just don’t like corruption whether it’s a democrat, republican, conservative, or liberal.  I am a republican and pray that Obama loses in November.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

I completely agree ppartes and McCain will get my vote.  I just wish McCain wouldn’t be against drilling in ANWAR and off the coast of Florida.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

Excuse me, you were saying?

Dougee:  I agree, but I also think McCain will eventually satisfy our concerns on the issue of ANWR.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

I know rbb.  I wish I had a candidate that I could support enthusiastically.  However, the two men I liked (Romney and Thompson) are out so to me a vote for McCain is a vote against Obama.  There are some republicans in ND that I will be happy to vote for: Brian Kalk for PSC, Adam Hamm for Tax Comissioner.

I never said I was McCain’s number one fan.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency

Except this time...right Dougee?

Excuse me, you were saying?

Dougee:  Pay no attention to RBB.  He hates kids.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

Why waste your vote on someone you really don’t support.

Write in Fred.

It is truly the only way you can stay true to your core beliefs. If that is really what you want...to stay true to your core beliefs.

Excuse me, you were saying?

I figured that much.  Some people are like that.  I have told him several times that I didn’t want McCain to get the nomination and that I was dissappointed with the fact.  But some people’s skulls are just too thick.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

I figured that much.  Some people are like that.  I have told him several times that I didn’t want McCain to get the nomination and that I was dissappointed with the fact.  But some people’s skulls are just too thick.

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

...I didn’t want McCain to get the nomination and that I was disappointed with the fact.

It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

Dougee, you really only have one choice. That is if you really believe half the stuff you write.

You can not in good faith vote for John McCain unless you compromise your values.

Lately gops are doing a good job at that...so it would surprise me if you were just a follower...but if you really want to send a message...write in the name of the person you really want to be our president…

Excuse me, you were saying?

I completely agree ppartes and McCain will get my vote.  I just wish McCain wouldn’t be against drilling in ANWAR and off the coast of Florida.  This could be a homerun for him and would really help McCain against Obama in November.

Don’t count on it kid.  McCain didn’t win by running on the conservative platform.  Either way, any POTUS next year is a win for Dems.

McCain is the most moderate Dem running this year.

sounds like this hippy knows how to make a buck off the bible belters hankerin’ for some horse-on-girl action.

amazing to hear what the ‘free trade’ crowd thinks about it!

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

pparets walked right into that rake. parroting social justice against a reagan appointed judge? must be a blue stater in our midst! hee hee hee.

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie: Might help a little if you bothered to read the whole thread…

Me, some way back:

Dougee: In fairness, Kozinski was a Reagan appointee.

But then you were never one to let fairness or the facts get in the way of your juvenile rants.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

pp
you distract the fact that you are proceeding from premises that are anti-capitalist and pro-’social justice’. the fact that its a reagan appointee is minor.

explain yourself. or are you blue?

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

You’re an idiot.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

pparets.

again, you dodge the question.

do you think that the free market and individual freedoms are more important, or would you like to see your brand (of which there are many) of ‘social justice’ enforced on a federal level so as to ‘clip the wings’ of free marketism and individual liberties? isn’t personal responsibility big for you guys? so why do you offer us a post with such p-parenting overtones? trying to remove the public’s ability to learn for themselves so they will be beholden to Obama, the giver and the taker-away?

you need to speak on this instead of offering snide slander. this is a political blog, but i am thinking perhaps you should stick with hockey-team-analogy posts.

and you described me as the team member who will soon be traded? i am not pandering to the ‘social justice’ crowd like you are.

in my mind, the answer to the above question makes the difference between being a ‘conservative’ and, say, Barack Obama or Hilldog.

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie:  I have no idea what you ranting about. 

This post and the thread are about a 9th Circuit Chief Justice hearing a case on porn while having a porn site of his own.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

This post and the thread are about a 9th Circuit Chief Justice hearing a case on porn while having a porn site of his own.

Oh. Conflict of interests, eh? That’s it? What about this

really creepy porn website, depicting people with ‘sexually aroused’ animals among other explicit items

isn’t all porn explicit? you seem to express anti-porn sentiments there. is that just an ‘ornament’ for your ‘conflict of interests’ post?
when combined with your comment about the leftist appeal of the 9th circuit court, it almost amounts to a ‘lefties are morally depraved’ or ‘this sort of business should be regulated’. i hope you can see why i am interested in a clarification. or is it an animal rights thing? has PETA got to you?

if the post is merely about conflicts of interest concerning a Reagan appointed judge, why all the ranting about porn, depravity, the left, and so on? it seems to me that you are crying out for your own brand of ‘social justice’ and decrying the free activities of adult individuals that don’t agree with your personal convictions. that would be a stereotypical description of a leftist tart. do you appreciate what I am saying? making sense to you yet, ‘p-parenting’?

(i love how the double p can be used for a stutter effect!)

Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”