This is a peek into the mind of people who want to take away your guns. They mean well. They are just misguided. The first is a letter from Saturday’s Chicago Tribune letter’s to the editor. The second was right below it. If you read them both you see what this debate looks like in Chicago. So you don’t think this is isolated, what happens here creeps out to the rest of the country slowly. I think our second amendment rights are on the endangered species list.
FIRST LETTER
Tobacco is legal. But it is also harmful. After compelling evidence showed the growing number of unintentional deaths and disease caused to nonsmokers by cigarette smoke, strict health laws were enacted in Chicago, which now severely restricts public use of tobacco.
So why aren’t more restrictive gun laws seen in the same way?
Unconstitutional?
Surely the Constitution guarantees a citizen’s right to light up a legal substance.
But the Constitution also guarantees life and liberty—or the right not to have cancer blown into your lungs by others.
When called upon to protect citizens from the harmful effects of modern innovations, our laws are meant to be equally innovative for the greater protection of all.
I applaud Mayor Richard M. Daley’s fist-pounding and frustration over the continued lack of understanding of this basic concept. Excessive cigarette smoke in our community kills people who do not smoke. Guns in our community kill people who do not own guns.
It’s time for owners’ rights to take a more measured, reasonable importance. Theirs is not a right that should supersede all others, particularly life.
//////////////////////////////////
SECOND LETTER
Then what?
Many people (and not just criminals and crazies) will never turn in their weapons.
How do we find all those guns?
We can’t just wait until a gun is used and then confiscate it.
Then it’s too late.
It’s easy to say we should get rid of guns.
But can we really do it?
Say we forbid all private ownership of guns.
And we don’t know who has guns or where they are kept.
Where does that leave us?
I’m afraid that the police must have the power to do the following:
* Set up roadblocks at random and search every car and its occupants.
* Board buses and trains at random and frisk everybody.
* Search houses and businesses at random.
* Cordon off public areas such as malls and frisk everybody.
In short, the police must be allowed to search any person and any property at any time, with no probable cause needed.
Are we ready to give the police such sweeping power?
And will anything less do the job?
If, like me, you don’t want to live under a government with such power, then face it:
We won’t ever rid of the guns.
Instead we will have to analyze our society to find out why we are so ready to kill each other and then figure out how to change ourselves. And that will be a difficult job.
It’s so much easier to just spout off about getting rid of guns.