Wall Street Journal does some more reporting on Honduras
From the Wall Street Journal
As military “coups” go, the one this weekend in Honduras was strangely, well, democratic. The military didn’t oust President Manuel Zelaya on its own but instead followed an order of the Supreme Court. It also quickly turned power over to the president of the Honduran Congress, a man from the same party as Mr. Zelaya. The legislature and legal authorities all remain intact.
And from the Webster online dictionary:
Main Entry:
coup d’état:
or coup d’etat \ˌkü-(ˌ)dā-ˈtä, ˈkü-(ˌ)dā-ˌ, -də-\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural coups d’état or coups d’etat-ˈtä(z), -ˌtä(z)\
Etymology:
French, literally, stroke of state
Date:
1646: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics ; especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group
This fits the dictionary definition of coup, as in “a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics.” The people denouncing it however, are using the term with the “especially: the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group.”
The only thing that changed about the government was who the president was. It wasn’t violent either.
Again from the WSJ:
We mention these not so small details because they are being overlooked as the world, including the U.S. President, denounces tiny Honduras in a way that it never has, say, Iran. President Obama is joining the U.N., Fidel Castro, Hugo Chávez and other model democrats in demanding that Mr. Zelaya be allowed to return from exile and restored to power. Maybe it’s time to sort the real from the phony Latin American democrats.
Oh yes, it is time. We must work to end dictatorships around the world and replace them with republics and democracies. We must especially pounce on dictators who practice Stalin’s quote, “It matters not who votes, but who counts the votes.” However, our president and his cabinet are not likely to do that.
The Wages of Chavismo (Wall Street Journal)

