Say Anything Blog

Here is the key, I can only hope more people understand this simple idea: “what is considered acceptable by civilians must not be blindly imposed on a military institution that the great majority of society chooses not to join.”

If those non-gays supporting the end of DADT cannot accept the opinions of the veterans that fought our wars, then I believe their support for ending DADT is made with a bias that cares less about the combat readiness of our forces and the defense of liberty than they do political correctness and social experimentation.

These two groups said they will keep an open mind to the results of the most recent investigation into the wisdom of ending DADT, but no matter what, with two ongoing wars this is not the time.

The nation’s two most prominent veterans groups have come out in opposition to President Obama’s plan to end the military’s long-standing ban on open homosexuals in the ranks.

The opposition from the American Legion, the largest American veterans group, and the Veterans of Foreign Wars, comes as the White House has begun a push in Congress to repeal the law this year.

Pro-gay groups received a significant boost Tuesday when the U.S.‘s highest-ranking military officials, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the Joint Chiefs chairman, told the Senate Armed Services Committee they support ending the gay ban, known as “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

Stiff opposition is expected, and spokesmen for the VFW and the Legion told The Washington Times on Wednesday their groups do not want to see military readiness disrupted while the armed forces are fighting two wars. The two groups have more than 4 million members combined.

“We support ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ and the position is, now, since we are still fighting two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, now is not the time to extend ourselves with a new social-engineering project,” Legion spokesman Joe March said. “We expect the Pentagon will very carefully examine the implications before changing any policies to maintain that highest state of readiness.”

“The VFW is fully aware that societal norms regarding homosexuality have changed since the 1993 passage of [the ban], but what is considered acceptable by civilians must not be blindly imposed on a military institution that the great majority of society chooses not to join,” spokesman Joe Davis said.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/04/veterans-groups-rap-push-to-end-military-gay-ban/

I think the idea is to build an international Middle East Peace movement to force Israel to give up all pre-1967 territories to the Palestinians, thereby creating a false Peace in the Holy Land. At the right moment they pull in and credit Mahdi Obama and he gets the credit for world peace, thus saving Mahdi Obama’s global messiah image and his presidency.

It also appear Jeremiah “G-d damn America” Wright is also involved with trying to build this Middle East peace movement and credit Mahdi Obama.

I do have one question in the story below, what is a financial campaign bundler (Jodie Evans)?

Former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers, a close associate for years to President Obama, is seeking to create a “peace movement.”

Ayers previously has alluded to creating a “peace” movement to “save” Obama’s presidency.

“With any luck, the peace movement, the justice movement can save his (Obama’s) presidency. So to me the injunction is to get busy and build a movement,” Ayers stated in an April 2009 interview with The Commentary Factory.com.

Ayers lately has been involved with pro-Palestinian activism.

Last month, WND reported Ayers and his wife, Weather Underground co-founder Bernardine Dohrn, were involved in provoking chaos on the streets of Egypt in an attempt to enter the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip to join in solidarity with the territory’s population and leadership.

The protests were led in large part by Jodie Evans, co-founder of Code Pink, a far-left activist organization formed in 2002 to protest America’s war in Iraq. The group previously met with Hamas and with leaders of the Taliban. Evans was a fundraiser and financial bundler for Obama’s presidential campaign.

Also protesting in Egypt was Ali Abunimah, co-founder of the anti-Israel Electronic Intifada website. WND previously reported Obama spoke at pro-Palestinian events in the 1990s alongside Abunimah. In one such event, a 1999 fundraiser for Palestinian “refugees,” Abunimah recalls introducing Obama on stage.

In May, Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., who also sparked controversy for Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign, spoke at a Chicago church to a gathering called by the Oak Park-based Committee for a Just Peace in Israel and Palestine. The talk at the church reportedly preceded a 1-mile walk of solidarity through downtown Oak Park.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124174

This is a parody, it is humor, I hope it will entertain you; but, sometimes humor can also be a way to tell a grand truth! Enjoy!

The President tried to connect God’s approval to his agenda regarding global warming, immigration and homosexual marriage. It was unconscionable, IMO, to use the God that I even question he believes in at all, to be behind his socialist and anti-Christ agenda.

Who says the pastors behind amnesty for illegal aliens are conservatives. Even if they are, they can be and IMO are wrong on this issue. To treat these criminals humanely in the Name of Christ is one thing, it is quite another to suggest Christ would look over their crimes and want them granted citizenship.

No one should be for global warming, IMO, everyone should want a cleaner planet to support our diverse ecology. Even Christians should support reasonable efforts to keep the environment clean, but since the Bible tells us God will destroy the earth and create a new one, like Eden, it is hardly a major mission of the Church to align themselves with secular environmental movements.

President Obama today lobbied for his “gay” and “green” agendas both during the traditional appearance by a president before the National Prayer Breakfast.

But the president whose party when it held a majority in the U.S. House and a so-called supermajority of 60 votes in the U.S. Senate pushed for its agenda items without, at times, even consulting the minority GOP, said, “At times, it seems like we’re unable to listen to one another; to have at once a serious and civil debate.”

He said such “erosion of civility in the public square”  produces “division and distrust among our citizens.”

He then suggested the nation needs “to find our way back to civility” and said that means “stepping out of our comfort zones…”

”We see that in many conservative pastors who are helping lead the way to fix our broken immigration system. It’s not what would be expected from them, and yet they recognize, in those immigrant families, the face of God,” he said.

Lobbying for his efforts to forward “green” programs such as new taxes on energy consumption, he said, “We see that in the evangelical leaders who are rallying their congregations to protect our planet.”

Raising the issue of his longstanding support for homosexual causes, he said, “We may disagree about gay marriage, but surely we can agree that it is unconscionable to target gays and lesbians for who they are…”

Obama pushed hard for and signed into a law that gives homosexuals special protections against “hate,” a law that, according to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, is a “menace” to civil liberties.

Obama also chose to honor as a “civil rights pioneer” a homosexual who said the God of the Bible is a “sinful, homophobic bigot” who needs to “seek forgiveness for the pain and suffering which his sinful homophobia has needlessly inflicted upon gay people for the past 4,000 years.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124116

We have discussed homosexual marriage herein ad nauseam, and so I’ll leave it at this for now: It is not up to the federal government IMO to regulate marriage, it is up to each state, “the people,” not legislatures or the courts, to define what are the minimum requirements for marriage and Obama and Congress should stay out of the issue!

The mission of the Church is to promote the Gospel and while I believe it is the duty of every Christians to select and support only Christian candidates for office and to encourage our lawmakers to pass legislation that is consistent with Judeo-Christian principles, the Church needs to be less invested in the State and concentrate more on saving souls.

If Obama’s words and actions seem to be contrary to his expressed Christian faith and even seem pro-Islam, why is it somehow unAmerican for many Christians to ask serious questions about the reality, the sincerity of his Christian faith?

If a segment of society is concerned about whether or not we have a Constitutionally qualified POTUS, why are they are attacked and ridiculed as they have been here at SAB and by self-serving people like Bill O’Reilly? Is it somehow unAmerican to stand in the political square and demand answers?

What is wrong about asking these and other questions? 

President Obama today at the National Prayer Breakfast raised the issue of his own eligibility for office – saying that people shouldn’t be questioning his “citizenship.”

Talking about the issue of “civility,” he said, “Now, I am the first to confess I am not always right. Michelle will testify to that. But surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith, or, for that matter, my citizenship.”

Obama continues, “Challenging each other’s ideas can renew our democracy. But when we challenge each other’s motives, it becomes harder to see what we hold in common. We forget that we share at some deep level the same dreams – even when we don’t share the same plans on how to fulfill them.”

The questions, however, over Obama’s “citizenship,” actually go to the core of the American republic. Multiple lawsuits have challenged that he is not qualified for the Oval Office under the Constitution’s requirement that U.S. presidents be a “natural born citizen.”

“Personally I am no birther … but I am curious as to why Obama continues to beat on this issue .. is it a political ploy by his handlers to continue to use this as a divisive issue? To try and embarrass a certain segment of the population? And if not, why doesn’t he just provide the certificate and end all the speculation for the conspirators once and for all? Obama has certainly been a little less than forthcoming on his grades, his Harvard review publications and many other accomplishments…”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124115

I am no birther and I do not demand a President that claims the Christian faith to follow it as I might or to make an issue of it daily. But, if a President says that he is this thing or that thing, or he is not this or that, I believe we should demand more than his word, surely it is reasonable to ask for proof.

Like so many liberals, Obama is crying out for civility, for civil discourse and for both parties to work together. I believe that is code for shut up GOP and go along, do what I say, not what I do. Quite frankly, the genius of our Founding Father’s was to give us a system designed to foster vigorous opposition and in this way the government will be able to do the least harm to the people. I do not want less confrontation and more civility in Congress, I want passionate opposition by both parties, if they cannot agree on things very often, we’ll have less laws and more liberty.

While it should not be understood that the New Education Secretary will not support gay tolerance programs in schools by her actions, she did bravely oppose the airing of a pro-Lesbian Cartoon on PBS, using tax payer dollars to expose small children to controversial sexual material on PBS.

She lost the battle, as PBS is decidedly pro-gay and some stations will air this pro-lesbian cartoon to show, as they would put it, their desire to promote tolerance. But, I am encouraged that an Obama appointee would have the courage and wisdom to oppose the use of tax payer dollars for a program solely designed to challenge those parents that oppose the gay lifestyle choice and would not want their children exposed to such pro-gay indoctrination in the form of a cartoon that would appeal to their children.

Despite a rebuke from the new education secretary and an official cancellation by PBS, several large affiliates of the public TV network say they will air today a controversial episode of “Postcards from Buster,” a cartoon series for pre-schoolers, that portrays homosexuality.

Shortly after taking office last week, Secretary Margaret Spellings denounced PBS for using public dollars to promote the homosexual lifestyle.

In a letter to the president of PBS, Spellings said: “Many parents would not want their young children exposed to the lifestyles portrayed in this episode. Congress’ and the Department’s purpose in funding this kind of programming certainly was not to introduce this kind of subject matter to children, particularly through the powerful and intimate medium of television.”

PBS subsequently canceled the episode, entitled “Sugartime!” In the episode, Buster the rabbit visits a Vermont home headed by two lesbians.

According to a report in New York Newsday, WGBH, the powerful Boston public television station
that makes the series, said it will air the program today and has offered it to other PBS stations. The paper says 18 stations plan to air it, including New York’s WNET and KQED in San Francisco.

”Secretary Spellings has been ridiculed in the liberal media and bombarded by the homosexual community because of her bold stand for our children,” Don Wildmon, AFA chairman, said in a statement. “We need to let her know that mainstream America appreciates her recognition that the government should not push a homosexual agenda on children that goes against many parents’ convictions.

“Children’s videos should not be used to promote the homosexual lifestyle, and we want Margaret Spellings to know we appreciate her commitment to our children and respect for their parents.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=28739

Notice that the pro-gay thugs immediately attacked Secretary Selling for not kowtowing to their agenda!

Apparently playing a 9 year old rape victim was the launch pad for Fanning to be the deviant sexual role model for the next generation of American youth. Now she chose the role of a foul mouthed, drug addicted, promiscuous little whore that engages in Lesbianism for fun.

Then as this generation grows up and we fall even further into the moral sewer, Americans will not be shocked, they apparently wanted this moral decay in our nation or they would not allow their children of any age to go to such movies or go themselves. Hollywood makes money off this teen aged soft pornography and they don’t care what happens to our children as long as they make money, they are creating a child sex monster that they cannot nor even want to control.

Fifteen-year-old child star Dakota Fanning is starring in yet another provocative movie role – snorting cocaine in bathrooms and participating in a steamy lesbian kiss and heavily implied sex scene with her female co-star.

Her latest movie, “The Runaways,” is rated “R” and will release March 19. It premiered at this year’s Sundance film festival.

Fanning plays the role of Cherie Currie, lead vocalist of The Runaways, an all-girl hard-rock band popular in the 1970s. Former “The Twilight Saga” star Kristen Stewart, 19, plays openly lesbian rocker Joan Jett, the band’s guitarist.

According to an early version of the script, the opening scene includes a splotch of menstrual blood hitting the sidewalk. Fanning’s character is seen with blood dripping down her leg
as she begins her first menstrual cycle.

Jett is a rebellious teenager who curses, shoplifts leather pants, urinates on electric guitars, smokes, pops pills, takes part in several sexually charged scenes and smashes objects. Jett teaches another band member, Sandy, how to masturbate to Farrah Fawcett.

Fanning’s character cusses often, acts out, appears scantily clad in bed with “twenty-something surfer dudes,” drinks, uses cocaine and pops prescription pills. At age 15 she is abandoned by her mother, who moves to Indonesia with her boyfriend, and her father is an alcoholic.

“That behavior includes a lesbian affair, sexually explicit song lyrics, risqué clothing and a pathetic character in a drugged-out existence,” Miller told WND. “In her interviews at Sundance, nowhere have I seen her denounce any of that behavior as destructive or immoral. In fact, she romanticizes her Cherie Currie character. Fanning indicates the lesbian sex scene is just a natural progression of the relationship.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123895

There are many, even here at SAB and even some so-called conservatives that do not give a damn about the morality of future generations, they do not care if our children are being sexualized, becoming sex victims, they even speak proudly of sex abstinence programs that refrain from mentioning anything about morality or decency or family.

Well here is a great on-line program for their children to play! It will help them become good capitalists by selling their bodies and buying sex aids. Hooray!

We are surely, as a nation, in the sewers of sexual depravity and engaged a war against Christianity and morality.

Aspiring fashion queens choose lingerie, contraceptives, ‘clients’

Young girls aspiring to be fashion queens may find more than they bargain for in a new, free, online game called “My-Minx,” which permits players to role play … as prostitutes.

At My-Minx.com, touted by its own header as the “online fashion game for girls and dress-up game for style icons” and the place where “Barbie meets Chanel,” players create an avatar – or online representative – that flirts, shops, develops her career, builds a wardrobe, competes in style shows, and picks up lovers and “clients” at an online cocktail bar.

In addition, girls as young as five or younger – should they have the computer know-how – can immediately trade in online points to “purchase” for their avatar lingerie, nipple tassels, condoms and “antibaby” pills among other choice items on their way to the top of their own fashion empire.

“Having them getting virtual condoms or morning after pills will not make them any less promiscuous. As regards child adoption, this game encourages them to think that they don’t need to worry about morals or ethics,” spokesman Andy Hibberd of Parentkind told London’s Daily Mail. “It is sending out all the wrong messages, and the only reason its creators have made it is to make money. They are exploiting children for profit. Children’s innocence is very precious.”

A quick trip to the clothing store finally relieved the avatar’s nudity, but a jaunt to the cocktail bar to find “a lover” produced a startling message: “You managed to find a new client – well done. Kachiing!”

Apparently, however, being a prostitute isn’t very profitable in the game’s Style City. The new “client” only paid the avatar character 50 points, or “pink pounds” (the game designer is British), per day – not a lot of “Kachiing,” when purchasing a pair of ballerina shoes for the avatar costs 150.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123897

IMO,the illegal alien problem has never been about the costs of deporting these criminals that enter our country illegally, it has never been about how the illegal immigrants contribute to our economy or about fairness or any other issue; no, giving amnesty to illegal aliens is about importing a large number of Democrat Party voters to insure Democrat Party rule for many, many generations and insuring the socialist agenda succeeds.

Who wants it most? The Unions! Which will insure they rule the Democrat Party and the nation - creating a workers paradise, a communist state.

Granting citizenship to millions of illegal immigrants would expand the “progressive” electorate and help ensure a “progressive” governing coalition for the long term, declared a recent adviser to President Obama whose union group is among the most frequent visitors to the White House.

”We reform the immigration laws, it puts 12 million people on the path to citizenship and eventually voters,” stated Eliseo Medina, international executive vice-president of Service Employees International Union, or SEIU.

The SEIU is closely linked to the controversial Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN. SEIU President Andrew Stern was the most frequently logged White House visitor, according to an official list released in October.

Despite the explanations and the spin and the possible firing of the principle, it is too bad parents don’t ask themselves these same questions about their poor performing children and of course about their own involvement in their children’s homework.

I am not saying the letter should have gone out, I would hated to have received such a letter, but there is some truth there to ponder nonetheless.

An Arizona school principal who penned a sarcastic letter that chided parents for children who were either “too lazy or too stupid” to complete their assignments in class was suspended after the missive was mistakenly sent home.

”The math we do is really easy,” said the letter from Litchfield Elementary School principal Ron Sterr. “If your child is either too lazy or too stupid to finish it in class, I’m sending it home so that you can work with them and judge for yourself whether it is laziness or idiocy that inhibits your child’s progress.”

Sterr said Tuesday that he wrote the joke letter in response to caustic comments made by “an individual” and a teacher accidentally sent it home. In an interview with The Associated Press, Sterr said nothing in the letter represents his views toward children and that he openly opposes those views.

“The purpose of the letter was to mock those views and point out how ludicrous they are,” Sterr said. “I have always loved the kids, and I believe they know it. For anyone to assume that I have those kinds of views is uninformed.”

Sterr said he will not be returning to Litchfield Elementary as principal. He faces a demotion and possible termination.

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-odd/20100202/US.ODD.Principal.Suspended/

In the spirit of honest disclosure I am not a Catholic nor have I ever been supportive of the Roman Catholic Church. However, in this case the Pope is right, under any concept of freedom of religion, religious people and organizations should not be forced to accept laws that are contrary to their faith.

A Christian adoption agency should not be forced to consider gay couples as potential adoptive parents. No Christian based organization or business should be forced to hire people that their faith considers to be engaged in sinful lifestyles or in the case of people renting homes or apartments be forced against their faith to rent or sell to people they consider, by their faith, to be living wicked lifestyles.

If there are other organizations or businesses that are in a reasonable driving range that provide the same services, then a Christian organization denying some people their services should be exempt. Or, freedom of religion is meaningless.

Campaigners to launch protest over Pope’s UK visit after he condemns Harman equality drive as ‘violation of natural law’

Campaigners are to launch an online petition protesting against the Pope’s planned visit to the UK in the wake of his extraordinary attack on our equality laws, it emerged today.

The Pope yesterday hit out at Britain’s equality legislation, claiming Harriet Harman’s attempts to bring in new laws enforced sinful behavior.

The National Secular Society (NSS) today said it would mount a protest campaign against the visit made up of gay groups, victims of clerical abuse, feminists, family planning organisations and pro-abortion groups among others.

His remarks have been interpreted as an attack on the Sexual Orientation Regulations which forced Catholic adoption agencies to consider gay couples as potential adoptive parents.

Despite praising Britain’s ‘firm commitment to equality of opportunity for all members of society’, the world’s most powerful religious leader turned his guns on Miss Harman’s equality agenda, which many in the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church say could force them to hire homosexuals or transsexuals.

The Pope declared that some recent equality legislation has acted ‘to impose unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs’.

He added: ‘In some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1247706/Campaigners-launch-protest-Popes-UK-visit-condemns-Harman-equality-drive-violation-natural-law.html#ixzz0eOqwGHgN

I thought this PJTV Video: “Truckin’ 2010: Has Obama Set Democrats Up For a Long, Strange Trip?” was interesting and hope you do too.

http://www.pjtv.com/v/2995

Planned Parenthood has a huge financial interest in performing lots of abortions every year and they are backing legislation in the State of Washington to essentially place gags upon any clinic that engages in pregnancy counseling as they fear a loss of innocent children to murder in their abortuaries.

Next, even though these pregnancy crisis centers offer information based on published scientific data, mixed with personal and spiritual counseling to help pregnant mothers make informed decisions about carrying their child to term; PP demands they provide abortion referrals and only be allowed to present medical data that PP deems acceptable.

About 250 people packed the chambers of the state’s Senate Health and Long-Term Care Committee earlier this week for a hearing on Senate Bill 6452, a proposed law that requires crisis pregnancy center counselors to communicate only “medically and scientifically accurate” reproductive health information – even though what is “accurate” has been hotly contested, even in the committee’s chambers.

The bill’s sponsor, State Sen. Rodney Tom, D-Medina, for example, backed by a doctor from the University of Washington, claimed that in some cases, center volunteers have misled women to believe that abortion increases their risk of developing ovarian cancer.

Yet later in the hearing, former nurse Sen. Cheryl Pflug, R-Maple Valley, told the committee a 2009 study by the Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center found that an abortion does indeed increase the risk of cancer by 40 percent.

The bill is supported by Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice Washington, which explains on its website: “Women go to these centers for medical care and unbiased pregnancy options counseling. Instead, they get false or misleading information about reproductive health care, their medical records are withheld and they are denied needed referrals for reproductive health care[abortions].”

Abortion opponents, however, decry the bill as an attempt to impose Planned Parenthood’s version of what is “accurate” and to clamp down on what counselors can and can’t say.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123582

PP is aligned with liberals in the ultra liberal state of confusion known as Washington State and this bill will pass to help make sure enough innocent children are murdered annually and PP keeps making those big bucks.

If Montana loses this battle for gun rights in their state, then there are no longer any states rights left at all. It means under the commerce clause the federal government has a right to regulate all intra-state activities of any kind.

It also means the Second Amendment is amended outside the Amendment process and is abrogated.

The federal government is claiming in court documents demanding the dismissal of a gun-law challenge in Montana the authority to regulate in-state commerce under the Constitution’s Commerce clause.

But the plaintiff in the case says the court needs to review that provision in its amended form – since the 10th Amendment, adopted after the Commerce Clause, can be viewed as modifying the Constitution’s provisions regarding the regulation of commerce, specifically granting additional authority to states.

He argues that the federal government was created by the states to serve the states and the people, and it is time for the states to begin drawing boundaries for the federal government and its agencies.

The government’s latest filing in the case demands its dismissal, citing a lacking of “standing” for the plaintiffs and the court’s lack of “jurisdiction,” as well as the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. The government filing argues, “The Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit have repeatedly held that even purely intrastate activities, such as those the MFFA purports to exempt from federal law, do affect interstate commerce and thus are within Congress’ power to regulate. As a result, even if plaintiffs had standing and jurisdiction existed, plaintiffs’ amended complaint fails to state a claim and must be dismissed.

“The FFA concept has created a firestorm of interest nationwide. Lots of people and other states are watching carefully to see how Montana fares in this challenge to overbearing federal authority and to Washington’s attempt to control every detail of commerce in the nation, especially including activity wholly confined within an individual state. That level of micro management certainly was not the intent of our founders when they gave Congress limited power in the Constitution to regulate commerce ‘among the states’,” he said.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123419

Not much anyone can say, but drunk or sober breaking into a closed bank with a gun has to qualify as the act of a complete moron!

Award-winning actor Rip Torn has been arrested after police found him intoxicated and armed inside a Connecticut bank at the weekend.

Torn, 78, was being held on $100,000 bond after officers responded to an alarm at the Litchfield Bank in Salisbury, the Connecticut town where the actor lives.

He was discovered inside the closed bank ‘with a loaded revolver’ and ‘highly intoxicated,’ according to a police report.

Torn was charged with burglary, criminal trespass and criminal mischief and weapons charges.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1247440/Actor-Rip-Torn-78-arrested-broke-U-S-bank-drunk-loaded-revolver.html#ixzz0eDUEDh8i