Say Anything Blog

Tony Blair is set to become EU President within weeks if Ireland votes ‘Yes’ in its referendum on the Lisbon Treaty tomorrow.

The former prime minister’s candidacy for the new post will be rushed through as quickly as possible, according to government sources.

Mr Blair is among the favourites to become the first President of the European Union, a role that is chosen by the EU’s 27 leaders and not by voters.

Such an appointment would restore him to the world stage as well as boost his long-term income.

Mr Blair has refused to rule himself in or out of the running, but did say that ‘it is good to have fans’ for a possible candidacy.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has given his full support to a Blair bid. When French foreign minister Bernard Kouchner was asked yesterday if Mr Blair was the only real candidate, he said: ‘For the moment, indeed.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217394/Blair-named-EU-President-weeks-Irish-ratify-Lisbon-Treaty.html#ixzz0SjIIfZOp

This is interesting, Blair was turned out as a failure, a liberal leader rejected by his people (A nearly mortal head wound?). Yet, now he has, pardon the phrase, been resurrected and instead of just running Britain, he will now rule Britain and all of Europe, almost the same was as Lord Obama runs the U.S.. It will, I believe, make him the most powerful man in the Western World.

Blair became Catholic, which will appease a mostly Catholic Europe, among those of any religious faith there. He is close to Muslims, anti-Semitic, shares Obama’s socialist beliefs and will have great power over NATO. I will be fascinated to watch this if Ireland does vote yes on Friday!

I am always amused by how scientists are so eager, so blindly passionate to find life on other planets or to prove man evolved from lower order of animals. It is not science, it is religion and I believe human evolution will always be missing that species-to-species, fully developed transitional form, but here comes the latest candidate (We should up to our butts in such fossils, if it were true).

She lived at the dawn of a new era, when chimps and people began walking (or climbing) along their own evolutionary trails (Just guessing).

This is Ardi - the oldest member of the human family tree we’ve found so far.

Short, hairy and with long arms, she roamed the forests of Africa 4.4million years ago.

Her discovery, reported in detail for the first time today, sheds light on a crucial period when we were just leaving the trees.

Experts believe Ardi is very, very close to the ‘missing link’ common ancestor of humans and chimps, thought to have lived five to seven million years ago.

’This is not that common ancestor, but it’s the closest we have ever been able to come,’ said Dr Tim White, director of the Human Evolution Research Centre at the University of California, Berkeley, who reports the discovery today in Science. The first fossilised and crushed bones of Ardi were found in 1992 in Ethiopia’s Afar Rift.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1217400/Ardi-skeleton-Ethiopia-closest-thing-missing-link-humans-apes.html#ixzz0SjFGiQRX

A few evolutionists here are probably turned on by this hot, hairy babe, which picture is wholly the figment of the imagination of some artist; and yet to their dismay this is NOT a missing link.

If humans evolved from apes or ape-like creatures, when did this happen? With more than 5000 fossils or fossil fragments of apes, chimps, and humans allegedly showing stages of human evolution, which ape-like animal had enough human characteristics for us to say “this one has just crossed the boundary from ape to human”?

The short answer is “it never happened,” and the fossils show this. Here’s what we mean.

First, there is disagreement among evolutionists about where to place many of the fossils, because they don’t all fit into a fully accepted sequence. Many fossils are set aside because they can’t be placed neatly in the ape-to-man scenario, or because they appear in the wrong time-frame.

This is why evolutionists have largely abandoned the idea that human evolution was linear, even though the alternative doesn’t help them either because it leaves them with a whole lot of unconnected fossils.

Second, here is an amazing fact: None of the ape fossils shows enough specific human features for evolutionists to say without doubt that this is the point where an ape turned human, and none of the human fossils shows enough specific ape characteristics to indicate that they have actually evolved from apes.

Well, I don’t want to spoil the fun for evolutionists, but “This is not that common ancestor.”

Farmer’s daughter disarms terrorist and shoots him dead with AK47

An Indian farmer’s daughter disarmed a terrorist leader who broke into her home, attacked him with an axe and shot him dead with his own gun.

Rukhsana Kausar, 21, was with her parents and brother in Jammu and Kashmir when three gunmen, believed to be Pakistani militants, forced their way in and demanded food and beds for the night.

When they forced their way into Miss Kausar’s home, her father Noor Mohammad refused their demands and was attacked.

His daughter was hiding under a bed when she heard him crying as the gunmen thrashed him with sticks. According to police, she ran towards her father’s attacker and struck him with an axe. As he collapsed, she snatched his AK47 and shot him dead.

She also shot and wounded another militant as he made his escape.

My kind of daughter, mess with my dad and “I’ll kill you!”  If more people made a stand and said to hell with terrorists making their lives hell and stated killing them, maybe the terrorists would get the idea its not smart and go elsewhere.

I love this story!

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — John Evander Couey, a convicted sex offender awaiting execution for kidnapping, raping and burying 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford alive, died of natural causes Wednesday.

Couey, 51, had been ill for some time and died at a Jacksonville hospital where he had been since Aug. 12, said Department of Corrections spokeswoman Gretl Plessinger.

“He murdered my granddaughter. He didn’t show any mercy to my granddaughter,” she said. “God took control of it. He took him out of this world. ... I’m not crying, honey. If my legs and feet would hold up, I’d go out and shout all over Citrus County.”

Citrus County Sheriff Jeffrey Dawsey, who oversaw the investigation, said his first reaction to Couey’s death was one of disappointment.

“I really wanted the state of Florida to put John Couey to death,” Dawsey said. “I wanted to be there to look into his eyes when they administered the serum.

“I guess this is nature taking its course,” he said. “And I’m satisfied with that.”

Couey died just over a month before the Florida Supreme Court was scheduled to hear his automatic appeal. He had an IQ of 78, slightly above the level generally considered mentally disabled, but the judge rejected an argument by his lawyer that he could not be legally executed.

Couey confessed to the crime, but his confession was thrown out because he did not have a lawyer present. Jail guards and investigators testified he repeatedly admitted details of the slaying but said he hadn’t meant to kill the girl.

Couey previously had been convicted of exposing himself to a 5-year-old girl in 1991. His criminal record also included 24 burglary arrests and carrying a concealed weapon.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_FLORIDA_GIRL_SLAIN?SITE=NMALJ&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Why does this story interest me? I wonder if this heartless murder could have been prevented had we not many decades ago stopped even considering the idea of institutionalizing mental defectives (His I/Q was at idiot level), rather than worry about how they might feel about being locked up? 

I wonder what would have happened if after his first sexual crime, we would have forced him to be chemically sterilized? He might have led a better life and Jessica would probably still be alive. I wonder how much responsibility his relatives that hid him and excused his behavior should be held against them by society.

Anyway, he now faces Divine Justice while Jessica has known peace and joy since her untimely death. I do believe others should share his guilt!

A lesbian political activist who donated thousands to Democrats and homosexual causes is suspected of embezzling nearly $6 million from one of the world’s largest insurance firms.

Despite her $40,000 a year salary as an insurance
compensation specialist, Phyllis Stevens purchased two homes valued at more than $550,000 and gave thousands of dollars in donations to Democratic Party political candidates and homosexual groups.

The 58-year-old chairs the Midwest Chapter of Marriage Equality USA, a homosexual “marriage” advocacy group. She is accused of embezzling the money from health insurer Aviva over a period of five years. A civil complaint filed in federal court accuses Stevens of manipulating a computer system intended to give commission to insurance agents. She allegedly made payments to non-existent agents and deposited the commission into a bank account she shared with her lesbian partner, Marla, policy director for LGBT Fairness PAC.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=111512

Actually to me this is no big deal, she is just a freaking low life crook, but since rbb loves to expose only Republicans or Christians that commit crimes or are involved in moral failures, I thought this would help bring him back to reality.

GOP Seeks to Punish Democratic Lawmaker for ‘Die Quickly’ Comment

Republicans are seeking their own pound of flesh from a Democratic congressman who said Tuesday that the GOP wants Americans to “die quickly” if they get sick.

Rep. Alan Grayson,a first-term Democrat known for being provocative, made his comments on the House floor Tuesday night while criticizing Republican health care proposals.

Grayson represents a Republican-leaning central Florida district around Orlando and was already among the GOP’s top targets for the 2010 elections. Late Tuesday night, he defiantly gave Republicans more ammunition.

He highlighted his comments with a sign that that read: “The Republican Health Care Plan: Die Quickly.”

“Now Democrats have a different plan,” he said. “Democrats say if you have health insurance, we’re going to make it better. If you don’t have health insurance, we’re going to provide it to you. If you can’t afford health insurance, then we’ll help you to afford it.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/30/democratic-lawmaker-republicans-want-americans-die-quickly/

Of course this will be another lesson in two sets of rules for American legislators, one for Republicans and one for Democrats; as Prime Minister Pelosi and the Democrats will not condemn or take any action against such outrageous lies and attacks on the House floor.

This is attack politics by the Left! They have lost the National Health Care Debate, the American public are saying no. So, the Democrats as I showed in another post are saying the opposition are wanting to assassinate Democrats and here that the GOP wants patients to die. There is nothing so low and vile they will not do just to win!

Harriet Harman tells Arnold Schwarzenegger to shut down US website which tells punters to rate prostitutes

A ‘sinister’ website which allows British men to compare and rate prostitutes should be shut down, Harriet Harman said yesterday.

The Equalities Minister urged actor-turned-politician Arnold Schwarzenegger to ‘terminate’ the PunterNet website.

The site is modeled on the completely above-board tripadvisor, which allows tourists and business travelers to rate holidays and hotels.

PunterNet, which is based in California where the former actor is governor, allows customers to ‘review’ call girls and the services they offer.

Ms Harman told delegates at the Labour conference that it was a ‘sinister development which we are determined to stop’.

She said: ‘There is now a website ... where pimps put women on sale for sex and then men who’ve had sex with them put their comments on line.

‘It is PunterNet and fuels the demand for prostitutes.

‘It is the ultimate commodification of women and puts women at risk. It is truly degrading.

‘PunterNet has pages and pages of women for sale in London. I’ve raised it with the U.S. Ambassador to London and I’ve called on California’s governor Arnie Schwarzenegger to close it down.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217222/Website-allows-punters-rate-prostitutes-performance-closed-says-Harriet-Harman.html#ixzz0SbnmzITa

I am not sure Arnie has the power to shut it down or even if it is in the best interest of Free Speech or internet privacy to do so. It is clearly offensive, it furthers the impression that women are mostly sexual objects and not worthy of respect by men, it is wholly indecent; but is it in our age something that is a crime or since it must be accessed voluntarily, is their any public interest in shutting it down?

It is just another sign of the times!

PROVIDENCE — U.S. Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy fears that supercharged passions fueling the national health-care debate may lead to violence.

Drawing on his family’s violent past, the Democratic congressman told roughly 75 people gathered at a private health-care forum [he refuses any town hall meetings where people in opposition to ObamaCare might show up and actually want to express their feelings] Saturday morning that opponents of Democrat-backed health-care legislation had gone too far. He cited, as an example, 10,000 signs distributed at a recent Washington protest that read, “Bury ObamaCare with Kennedy.”

“My family’s seen it up close too much with assassinations and violence in political life. It’s a terrible thing when people think that in order to get their point across they have to go to the edge of violent rhetoric and attack people personally,” Kennedy told the nurses, union officials and AARP members finishing their breakfasts at the invitation-only event in the Providence Marriott hotel. “It’s fine for people to debate the issue and attack the issue, but when they go and stoop to the level of the vitriolic rhetoric that we’ve seen this debate turn up, it’s very, I think, dangerous to the fabric of our country.”

In a subsequent interview, Kennedy went further in warning that angry opposition could create physical danger for elected leaders.

“It’s very, very dangerous,” Kennedy said in the interview. “We put a lot of people in jail around the world for threatening our country’s security. But this atmosphere of attack that doesn’t attack the issue, but attacks the people, is very disruptive to the institution of democracy, which relies on a respect for the opposition.”

http://www.projo.com/news/content/KENNEDY_ON_HEALTH_CARE_DEBATE_09-27-09_K7FRTR_v20.3617923.html

Well charges of racism and of Tea Party Protesters and those at Town Hall meetings being called Nazi’s hasn’t calmed down the people, so now Kennedy tries using the assassinations of his brothers as a reason why objections to ObamaCare are undemocratic and violent.

This is part of the Democrat Party’s attempts to silence all debate on Health Care Reform, to make loyal, passionate opposition in the public square into a crime, because they absolutely hate the democratic process, that damnable idea that the peasants would dare question the wisdom of the ruling Democrat Party elite. The one thing the Democrat Party cannot stand is the antiquated concept of free political speech, they know the people now oppose ObamaCare and they do not want to hear from the people, because doggone it, the Democrats know what is best for the people and even if they have to force them to submit and take away their liberties in the process, well after all, it is for the children.

Finally, an actor-entertainer with brains!

Andy Williams, the veteran pop singer, has accused Barack Obama of “following Marxist theory” and “wanting the country to fail”.

Williams, a lifelong Republican whose hits include Moon River and Music To Watch Girls By, told the Radio Times he thought Mr Obama wanted to turn the US into a “socialist country”.

The 81-year-old was a friend of the Kennedy family during the 1960s and was present at the Los Angeles rally where Robert F Kennedy was assassinated in 1968.

“I was very close to Bobby and he asked me to be a delegate for him when he ran for president,” he said.

“He knew about me being a Republican, but just laughed and said, ‘Sign yourself in as a Democrat and then change back afterwards’. Sadly, I never got to do that.

“I was very close to Teddy Kennedy, too, and his death recently brought it all back. What a tragedy. Had he lived, I think Bobby would have been a great president.”

But Williams had a less favourable opinion of the current president.

”Don’t like him at all,” he said, “I think he wants to create a socialist country. The people he associates with are very Left-wing. One is registered as a Communist.

”Obama is following Marxist theory. He’s taken over the banks and the car industry. He wants the country to fail.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/6241196/Andy-Williams-accuses-Barack-Obama-of-following-Marxist-theory.html

The U.S. Secret Service is investigating a “poll” posted on Facebook that asked users the most unsocial, unspeakable question: Should President Obama be assassinated?

Edwin Donovan, a spokesman for the Secret Service, said the agency will take “appropriate investigative steps” in connection to the survey, which was posted on Saturday and was quickly removed when Facebook employees were alerted to its existence.

“We are continuing our investigation,” Donovan told FOXNews.com, declining further comment.
The poll asked respondents: “Should Obama be killed?”

The possible answers were “no,” “maybe,” “yes,” and “yes if he cuts my health care.”

Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt said a “third-party application” enabled an individual user to create what he said was an “offensive poll.”

“The application was immediately suspended while the inappropriate content could be removed by the developer and until such time as the developer institutes better procedures to monitor their user-generated content,” Schnitt said in a statement to FOXNews.com.

Facebook is now cooperating with the Secret Service, Schnitt said.

Bob Beckel, a Democratic Party strategist and FOX News contributor, said the individual responsible for the poll should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

“This is the kind of garbage that’s generated from the extreme right against Obama, and it’s going way over the line,” Beckel told FOXNews.com. “It’s got to be stopped. Find him, prosecute him and put him in jail.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/28/secret-service-probes-facebook-poll-asked-obama-assassination/

It is wholly inappropriate, wrong and grossly immoral to even ask such a question, I am totally, unqualified against this sort of rank stupidity. But, a question occurs to me in reading the story that someone here might answer, “Is it illegal, unconstitutional or in the nature of a criminal threat to simply ask this idiotic question in a poll?” Remember I am against the poll and question and any such act, I am just curious about whether the question alone constitutes a crime?

It is also a matter of concern to me that Beckel, absent any evidence of the source of this poll, quickly blamed it on someone on the political right. Isn’t that to incite anger and possible violence against people on the Right?

Quite frankly, I am more than a little concerned that some nut case out there, not a conservative or liberal - an insane fool, might try to kill Obama and not only am I morally against such a vile act, I think it would almost destroy this country with subsequent riots all over America, directed at whites generally and I hope and pray it will never happen.

Kevin Jennings, the radical homosexual activist who founded one of the biggest organizations in the nation to promote “gay” activities in public schools, needs to “come clean,” according to the Washington Times.

”A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an ‘older man.’ At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama’s ‘safe school czar.’ ... Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down,” the Times editorial board said.

“In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the [man-boy] relationship.”

The editorial cited Jennings’ statement that in the case of the 15-year-old there wasn’t any evidence he knew the student was involved in sex with the older man. But the Fox report uncovered an audiotape contradicting that assertion. It indicates Jennings told the student to make sure “to use a condom” in his activities.

“Jennings … has not admitted that he made mistakes … and he now refuses to answer any questions about the scandal. … Encouraging and covering up man-boy sexual activity are serious offenses,” the editorial said.

Another incident was the “fistgate” scandal in which he led discussions at a seminar where “young teens were guided on how to perform dangerous homosexual perversions including ‘fisting,’” the website said.

Yet another was Jennings’ address in a New York City church on March 20, 2000. He said:

“Twenty percent of people are hard-core fair-minded [pro-homosexual] people. Twenty percent are hard-core [anti-homosexual] bigots. We need to ignore the hard-core bigots, get more of the hard-core fair-minded people to speak up, and we’ll pull that 60 percent [of people in the middle] over to our side. That’s really what I think our strategy has to be. We have to quit being afraid of the religious right. We also have to quit — I’m trying to find a way to say this. I’m trying not to say, ’[F—] ‘em!’ which is what I want to say, because I don’t care what they think! [audience laughter] Drop dead!”

Jennings also said: “If the radical right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose. Their language ‘promoting homosexuality’ is one example – is laced with subtle and not-so-subtle innuendo that we are ‘after their kids,’” he told the conference.

He continued, “In Massachusetts the effective reframing of this issue was the key to the success of the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth. We immediately seized upon the opponent’s calling card – safety – and explained how homophobia represents a threat to students’ safety by creating a climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common. Titling our report ‘Making Schools Safe for Gay and Lesbian Youth,’ we automatically threw our opponents onto the defensive and stole their best line of attack. This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedaling from day one.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=111347

So, a principle adviser on education for Lord Obama supports man-boy sex (statutory rape). He teaches how-to classes to teenagers on such perversity as “fisting,” he has deliberately perverted language to make his promotion of homosexuality in our public schools about protecting children to hide his real child recruiting intent and he is rabidly, hateful of Christians.

This is why these Czars are not a good idea, they are not subjected to the vetting process of Congress and thereby Lord Obama steps around Congress and is ruling America by Czars.

The commonly referenced “God gap” between Republicans and Democrats is disappearing.

Polls released before the 2008 election demonstrated America’s Christian voters are no longer synonymous with the political right: a George Barna survey showed born-again Christians evenly split between John McCain and Barack Obama, and a Public Religion Research study
found that even among white Evangelicals, touchstone issues like abortion and same-sex marriage weren’t in their top five voting considerations.

If Christian voters share common morals and values, how is it that their voting patterns and priorities aren’t more unified?

According to a new study, the answer is that Christians don’t share a common worldview, their morals and values sprayed across the spectrum by differing views in a handful of key areas.

Practically speaking, the differences between the two groups plays out in the causes and the priorities considered important to each.

For example, when asked about the most important issues among a set of eight choices, conservative activists pegged as priorities abortion (83 percent) and same-sex marriage (65 percent). Fewer than 10 percent of their progressive counterparts, however, identified those issues as “most important,” choosing instead to focus on poverty (74 percent), health care (67 percent) and the environment
(56 percent).

The activists not only differed on their priorities, but also on the positions they took, despite their professed common religious beliefs.

For example, 95 percent of the conservative religious activists responded that abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, while 80 percent of the progressives answered that abortion should be legal in most or all cases.

Similarly, only 13 percent of conservative activists supported additional environmental protection at the cost of raised prices or lost jobs, while 87 percent of progressive activists would rather suffer the price in exchange for increased environmental protections.

The disparity between the two groups was also reflected on the issues of same-sex marriage (82 percent of conservatives opposed, 59 percent of progressives in favor), government health care, the Iraq war, the use of extreme interrogation techniques and so on.

And despite being divided in their voting patterns (93 percent of progressives voted for Obama in 2008, while 90 percent of conservatives report voting for McCain), the majority of both groups affirmed that faith was “an important factor” in their voting decision.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=111154

The truth is the title and premise of this study is faulty. This study is only partially a reflection of Christian values and world view.

Since most so-called Progressive Christians identified herein do not even believe the Bible is God’s Word and as to faith and morals inerrant, I must seriously question their being Christians at all. They may feel like they believe in God and even feel they have some faith in Christ, but how can they have an intimate relationship with Christ, to know Him personally and deny His Word on any point? Remember, He is the Word, He not only inspired every word of Holy Writ, He is the personification of the Word of God, to deny the all-sufficiency of the Word is to deny Christ.

This study does not in my opinion reflect the values of the true Church, it is a poll mostly of ‘religious” minded people, for the most part not people walking in a close relationship with Jesus, not people born of his Spirit. The true Church cannot be divided in these matters, for if that were true Christ would have to be divided, He would have to have left the Church to twist in the wind, without its Shepherd and be guilty of child neglect which means He cannot be God at all. Lastly, remember the Church, the children of God are NOT citizens of this nation or world, they are citizens of Heaven NOW in spirit! They are not here to change or redeem the world, but to change themselves into disciples of Christ and to be used of the Spirit to win souls to Christ.  This world has already been judged, it is set for destruction in the end, while Christians are to have our hearts set upon Christ and eternity and His last words were that we were to moment by moment look up for Him to return as He Left.

It is sad so many people are deceived, thinking if they believe Jesus was a good philosopher and are ‘spiritual” they are Christian, when they do not know Him at all. This is a bad study, poorly designed and offers us no real insight into the thinking of Christians.

Dozens of pastors around the nation are challenging an Internal Revenue Service rule that anti-Christian activists often invoke when they want to silence the message of churches, according to the Alliance Defense Fund.

The organization has announced that more than 80 preachers are taking part in its second annual Pulpit Freedom Sunday this weekend.

The pastors will preach Sunday sermons related to biblical perspectives on the positions of electoral candidates or current government officials, exercising their constitutional right to free religious expression, the ADF said.

They will do so despite a “problematic” IRS rule that activists use when they want to silence the message of Christians, the ADF said.

”Pastors have a right to speak about biblical truths from the pulpit without fear of punishment. No one should be able to use the government to intimidate pastors into giving up their constitutional rights,” ADF senior legal counsel Erik Stanley explained.

The censorship for church pastors has been in place since the Johnson Amendment was added to the Federal Tax Code in 1954. However, enforcement has been spotty and the results have been vague, even though critics of Christian churches contend it limits what they can say from the pulpit.

”Churches were completely free to preach about candidates from the day that the Constitution was ratified in 1788 until 1954,” explained Stanley. “The real effect of the Johnson Amendment is that pastors are muzzled for fear of investigation by the IRS. Rather than risk confrontation, many pastors have self-censored their speech, afraid to be critical of blatant immorality in government and foregoing opportunities to praise moral government leaders. The participants in Pulpit Freedom Sunday refuse to be intimidated into sacrificing their First Amendment rights.”

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=111038

First for you Christian haters, I am actually not in favor of tax exempt status for Christian churches and only Christian churches. I do not care about such tax exempt status for Muslims or even witchcraft. Such entanglements by the Christian with the evil world system only and always pollutes and contaminates the pure Gospel. The Gospel needs to be preached boldly, without fear and in defiance of the State.

Next for you Christian haters, it is a violation of the Bill of Rights to use the tax code or any involvement by any organization, even schools, with the government as a reason to deny them free political speech or freedom of worship. The Bill of Rights prohibited Congress from passing ANY laws that in any manner infringe upon these basic human rights.

Next for you Christian hating liberals, while it is unconstitutional, if such laws are to be enforced, it must be enforced against black churches equally as well, which daily use their pulpits to endorse liberal political candidates and make their pulpits available for politicians to use to promote liberal social programs.

I have said it until most of you are sick of it, but the Bill of Rights, and I know how much most of your passionately hate the idea, applies to Christians as well as non-Christians.

Mothers are banned from looking after each other’s children

Two working mothers have been banned from looking after each other’s toddlers because they are not registered childminders.

The close friends’ private arrangement had let them both return to part-time jobs at the same company.

However, a whistleblower reported them to the education watchdog Ofsted and it found their informal deal broke the law.

This was because little-known rules say friends cannot gain a ‘reward’ by looking after a child for more than two hours outside the child’s home without agreeing to a number of checks including one from the Criminal Records Bureau.

Although the mothers never paid each other, their job-sharing deal was judged to be a ‘reward’. Campaigners fear thousands of working families could be innocently breaking the rules by relying on close friends for informal childcare.

‘There is no conceivable rationale behind it. It’s like making the assumption that all parents are pedophiles and they have to prove that they aren’t. As soon as we create a society like that then family life ceases. Parents have to have the confidence to make their own choices about their own children. This is absolutely extraordinary.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216220/Mothers-banned-looking-children.html#ixzz0SEQq8sR7

I just thought this was interesting, this new law in Britain to protect children demands that anyone looking after children for more than two hours a day must undergo a criminal background check and other steps to be certified as being safe. How about saying, “mom I need you to look after your grandchildren would you step over here so I can take your fingerprints please?”

Poland’s government has approved a law that will make chemical castration mandatory for pedophiles.

The new law will see those convicted of raping children under the age of 15 years undergo chemical therapy, in which they are made to take drugs to reduce their sex drive, following their release from prison.

The move has sparked criticism from human rights groups, but in a statement, the government defended its decision.

The purpose of this action is to improve the mental health of the convict, to lower his libido and thereby to reduce the risk of another crime being committed by the same person,’ it read.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has been calling for obligatory castration for pedophiles since late last year. Branding them ‘degenerates’, he said that he did not believe ‘one can use the term ‘human’ for such individuals, such creatures’. ‘Therefore I don’t think protection of human rights should refer to these kind of events,’ he said.

Mr Tusk’s comments at the time prompted criticism from human rights groups. Today, the Helsinki Foundation of Human Rights said: ‘Introducing any mandatory treatment raises doubts as such a requirement is never reasonable.

’If somebody is of sound mind, we punish him. If he is sick, we try to cure him - that’s how it works in Polish law.

‘This bill introduces both approaches. As far as I know, this makes our law the strictest in Europe on this issue,’ said spokesman Piotr Kladoczny. The bill, which also increases prison sentences for rape and incest.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1216301/Chemical-castration-compulsory-paedophiles-new-Polish-law.html#ixzz0SEM5byRV

This sounds like the humane way to reduce the recidivism of pedophiles, which is often beyond their sick control, protect children and not bloat our prisons and public costs for these people. These people will not choose to voluntarily submit to such chemical castration so it seems reasonable to make it mandatory.

I am concerned about the state controlling people with chemicals, as in another thread I made the case that one small open door to the state in undermining liberty soon becomes a flood gate. Why not use chemicals to deal with those damnable Christians and their religious nonsense? Why not chemically treat conservatism or better yet, chemically treat everyone blogging. I am also concerned that it could be misused for cases of statutory rape that were consensual and approved by the family and other cases where it really wasn’t pedophilia.

Yet, because this protects innocent children from rape, incest and sexual molestation, a serious crime that has negative effects for a lifetime, I would like to see us consider this procedure and sentence in America.