Home (Post) ND News Mobile Say Anything Forum Contact Register Login

Kenny

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Victime MUST Matter Most!

The desire to push the leftist agenda means that victims feelings must matter more than anyone elses. This logic pushed Cindy Sheehan upon us. As a poor victimized mother, she must matter more than all the rest of us.

Well, now that Barack Obama is Pres…other victims are speaking.

Families of 9/11 victims want to keep Guantanamo open

GUANTANAMO BAY US NAVAL BASE, Cuba, (AFP) – Parents of five 9/11 victims called for the US military prison at Guantanamo Bay to remain open and for the military commissions to try the five men accused of perpetrating the attacks.
“We demand that this camp stay open and that the process continue,” said Joe Holland, whose son was killed during the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, and the Pentagon in Washington.
“Right here, right now, this is a good process, they are getting a fair trial,” Holland told reporters, referring to the military commissions established by the administration of President George W. Bush to try “war on terror” detainees held at the controversial facility.

Not that we care about these people. They’re just…well….not people we like.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

An End to a Fight That Shouldn’t Have Happened

In New York, a battle over patients rights was about to go to court:

NEW YORK (AP) — A 12-year-old New York City boy whose family battled a Washington hospital over his care has died in the hospital, the family’s lawyer said Sunday.
Motl Brody was pronounced dead Nov. 4 by Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, but a machine continued to inflate and deflate his lungs.
His remaining bodily functions ceased Saturday, the lawyer, Jeffrey Zuckerman, said.
...
Motl had been diagnosed with severe brain cancer and was at the hospital for six months.
His parents, who are Orthodox Jews, had clashed with the hospital over the hospital’s desire to disconnect the ventilator. Although Motl had been pronounced dead, his heart was still beating with the help of a cocktail of intravenous drugs and adrenaline.
That heartbeat prompted Motl’s parents to refuse the hospital’s request to remove all artificial life support.
...
The family had asked the hospital to leave the breathing machine on and keep administering drugs until the boy’s heart and lungs no longer respond.
Disagreements between families and medical providers over when to end care for terminally ill patients are common, experts say, but this case wound up in court with unusual speed.
On Nov. 2, the family asked a federal judge to block the hospital from doing any further tests for brain activity.
The hospital responded by asking a District of Columbia Superior Court judge for permission to discontinue treatment.

Let us make this clear. There should have been no disagreement. And that a hospital took legal action to discontinue treatment of a patient is absolutely outrageous.

The role of the doctor is to provide expert medical advice. One that has been given, it is the right of the patient or caregivers of the patient to refuse or accept that advice. Even if it is hopeless, it is the right of either the patient or the family to continue to continue to fight, and receive care up until the moment of death.

The medical profession, having long ago given up, do no harm, has gone further and further away from the goal of treating patients without the tradition, and clearly understood doctor patient relationships…in favor of abritrarily deciding who gets to live and who gets to die.

It is not the job of doctors to discard people who are too costly, too old, too sick, or have too little of a chance of survival, but rather to treat patients and follow the wishes of the sick and injured without bias. That fights between doctors and terminal patients (or their families) about how much care they deserve is a frightening development in medicine. One we should all be leary of. That the courts can be used by doctors to get rid of inconvenient patients is terrifying.

Crossposted

Friday, November 14, 2008

Tolerance on Display

Sad that a 14 year old gets it when so many adults don’t:

As the media keeps gushing on about how America has finally adopted tolerance as the great virtue, and that we’re all united now, let’s consider the Brave Catherine Vogt Experiment.
Catherine Vogt, 14, is an Illinois 8th grader, the daughter of a liberal mom and a conservative dad. She wanted to conduct an experiment in political tolerance and diversity of opinion at her school in the liberal suburb of Oak Park.
So just before the election, Catherine consulted with her history teacher, then bravely wore a unique T-shirt to school and recorded the comments of teachers and students in her journal. The T-shirt bore the simple yet quite subversive words drawn with a red marker:
“McCain Girl.”
“I was just really curious how they’d react to something that different, because a lot of people at my school wore Obama shirts and they are big Obama supporters,” Catherine told us. “I just really wanted to see what their reaction would be.”
“People were upset. But they started saying things, calling me very stupid, telling me my shirt was stupid and I shouldn’t be wearing it,” Catherine said.
“One person told me to go die. It was a lot of dying. A lot of comments about how I should be killed,” Catherine said, of the tolerance in Oak Park.
One student suggested that she be put up on a cross for her political beliefs.
Other entries in her notebook involved suggestions by classmates that she be “burned with her shirt on” for “being a filthy-rich Republican.”
Some said that because she supported McCain, by extension she supported a plan by deranged skinheads to kill Obama before the election.

The Politics of Tolerance has been illusory at best. And all of us who have not supported the messiah have been slandered like this.

Since Barack is a “new” politician, any criticism of him has been labelled “divisive”, “mean”, or downright “raaaaaaacist”. His supporters have been fanatics in exporting his “change”, by force if neccessary!

Behind each one of these violent little Obama “change thugs”, is a big violent Obama supporting “change thug” no doubt. Political stupidity in children comes from political stupidity in parents.

We have 4 years of this crap to look forward to.

Crossposted

So What About that bin Ladin Guy?

Apparently, he’s been pretty effectively marginilized:

WASHINGTON (AFP) – Osama bin Laden remains deeply isolated and has been forced to devote much of his energy to his own security, while his Al-Qaeda terror network remains resilient, CIA Director Michael Hayden said in a speech on Thursday.
“He is putting a lot of energy into his own survival, a lot of energy into his own security. In fact, he appears to be largely isolated from the day-to-day operations of the organization he nominally heads,” said Hayden, referring to the Al-Qaeda network.
He suggested that bin Laden was hiding somewhere in the remote Afghanistan-Pakistan border region, where he said Al-Qaeda has regrouped and bolstered its organization.
Hayden described “the sheer challenge of surveying every square mile of that inhospitable and dangerous region,” and said “part of the explanation for his survival lies in the fact that he has worked to avoid detection.”

The article is a mix of good and bad news, but the important thing to note, which I’ve said for years, is that taking out Bin Ladin will do virtually nothing in the fight against terrorism. He’s been hiding for years, devoting all of his resources to running from the reaper….constantly looking behind to make sure we haven’t caught up with him. He has little, if any, real role in the operations, or even the propeganda, of the organization. Yet, they are doing fine without him. Even rebuilding.

Bin Ladin is mostly a figurehead. Yet we’ve gotten it into our heads that this guy is the be all, end all of terrorism. Finding and killing him would be a huge moral victory for us. But it would also do little to stop terrorism. We were all a twitter when we killed Zarquawi, about how this would be a huge blow to al Quida. And it was…for a day or two. Then they sent in the Egyptian al Masri, and redoubled their efforts. The reality of our fight is complex…but people want simple answers. So we’ve told everybody that Osama Bin Ladin IS al Quida. It’s not even remotely true.

We’d do better getting rid of Zawahiri, al Masri, or al Iraqi. But that’s complex, and messy…and people don’t have the time or patience for all that.

Crossposted

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

The Death of the Politics of Change

Not that any of us expected Barack Obama to be an agent of real reform, but the speed at which he’s distanced himself from his supposed platform of “hope and change” is amazing.

Within a day of winning the election, Obama picked ultra-partisan Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. In 2006, his message to the Republicans said it all, “Since my kids are gone, I can say it. They can go fuck themselves.”  Reportedly after Clinton was being investigated, Emanuel stood at a table listing Clinton “betrayers”, and jamming the knife into the table after each name, screaming “Dead”. Even in the dirty world that is Washington politics, Rahm stands out for his nastiness, for sending rotting fish to his political enemies to make a statement.  Both as a Clintonista, and then again as a member of the House, he has been a ruthless, cutthroat advocate for the Democrat party, trying to bury Democrat scandals while overhyping Republican misdeeds. It was under his leadership that the Democrat party rallied around “Cold Cash” Jefferson.

(more...)

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Why Republicans and Democrats Are Different

The Republican Take on Ted Stevens:

The GOP King of Pork has been found guilty on seven felony counts for making false statements in relation to his corruption probe.

Goodbye and good riddance.

Surely she’s alone…

Yea! Corrupt Sen. Stevens Guilty on All Counts

Well, at least I know that Rob guy is opposed:

I agree, though I think conservatives should have been a bit more adamant about this starting more than a few years ago.

Well, conservatives seem to want to root scum out of their party. Where’s the Democrat support for their party? Nonexistant? What a shame.

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Running thoughts as I watched the debate

Unedited:

Barack Obama was fear mongering from the word go. And of course, everything is Bush’s fault. The man can’t go three seconds without lying. So is the bailout package a bad idea cause it came from Bush?

McCain, the spending of Washington is to blame! What? We need to buy bad mortgages? GAH!

Warren Buffet for Treasury Sec? Christ McCain. Are you retarded?

95% of working families would include the rich. What a douche.

My God, they’re both loser populists. What the hell is the difference?

Finally, McCain hits on Freddie and Fannie. 2nd highest in history? Hmmmm.

He says that bad loans should never have been made...but we need to help the people anyways.

If companies are borrowing money to make payroll...they need to die. He lies about de-regulation. Lies about his record. LIES. God, I want this dishonest twat to go away.

We have to coordinate with other countries on our problems? WTF? Oh yea, and Obama has no “special interests”. Or McCain for that matter.

Theresa hits the nail on the head. Obama “Well, you’re just cynical.” Great. Lies about Bush and surplusses. And of course, Dems had nothing to do with deficits and debt. Lies about spending cuts.

McCain touts McCain-Feingold and McCain-Lieberman. What a moron. Lies about Obama never going against party lines. OK, McCain is BETTER than Obama, but he’s not good.

Obama said high gas is bad. But he said before he was ok with it. If one believes that wind or solar will replace oil, they're stupid.

How is leaving money in the system (tax cuts) taking money out of the system? God this dude is an imbecile.

McCain's first good answer. On "sacrifices". Nvm, no, they just grow "more slowly than we like."

Obama. "Some of you may remember 9/11"...um all of us. The lie about Bush telling people to shop. It's all his fault we're divided! Imbecile. Jesus cries when he talks. That was one of the few things Bush did right.

Obama "It's not people's fault they took bad loans. The bank shouldn't have given them!" Fool. Earmarks are well over 18 billion every year. Class warfare crap. Higher taxes masked in neat rhetoric. What a schmuck.

McCain hits him with Jello line. Great. Good call on Herbert Hoover and raising taxes. His tax cuts sound nice. Would indeed help.

Good for Brokaw for shooting Obama down on breaking the rules.

Obama "We can't fix SS without understanding taxes". Less than 95% of Americans make under 250k. Long way of not answering the question.

McCain: "Social Security is easy to fix....did you hear Obama is a jerk."

Awesome. The solution is so simple it doesn't even need to be discussed. I shake my head.

Damnit, McCain on global warming. GAH. The only part that sounds ok is nuclear technology.Obama's 5 million jobs line is utter bullshit. It won't happen.

Uh oh, Obama and McCain agree...I'm gonna get screwed. Obama lies about the 23 times against alternative fuels. Factcheck shot him down there.

Obama sounds so stupid saying we can't drill our way out of the fuel problem. Oil is the only solution. And who the hell cares about China.

Brokaw's question about nukes is leading. The government shouldn't fund it either way.

And I'm tired of McCain saying "my friends" every six seconds. I'm also tired of the "You're Bush the 3rd" "No I'm not". It makes them both sound like children.

And Brokaw sounds pathetic begging them to stop.

Government mandate NEVER helps reduce costs. It just adds beaurocracy, which is expensive. Demanding same money coverage for those with

pre-existing conditions will riase the cost for all. Oh please, health insurers spend a shitload of money on Dems. God, neither of them are winning the debate...but I'm losing.

The line about Obama fining people for not having insurance is a lie. Sigh. The man sucks enough without lying about his record. He's attributing Hillary's plan to Obama.

Why can't we have interstate insurance. Because Arizona sucks. Great. Thank you Obama. Get hit with a clue please.

We do need to help the world...but we are not the world's keeper. We did wrong in Kosovo, and McCain is wrong to stand by it. If you're going to hammer Obama about being wrong in Iraq, admit you were wrong in Kosovo.

Oh who the hell cares about 9/11 when talking about Iraq? Iraq wasn't about 9/11. We WERE greated as liberators in Iraq. Hell, no matter how silly McCain sounds to back Kosovo (most people don't know hes wrong), Obama is stupid to CONTINUE to oppose Iraq. And what else cost 700 billion? Oh right, that horrible bailout. How did Obama vote on that....oh right.

How has our respect hurt our ability to respond? And Obama won't change our respect, This dude is a child.

We had the ability to stop Rwanda. We just didn't. I do believe that was a Democrat.....That's the first smart thing he ever said. "We can't be everywhere all the time. Some attrocities will happen." And he follows up with stupid. "It would be little cost." Iraq was still expensive before the invasion. He sounds naive.

Damnit, Somalia was a joint screwup. Bush Sr. sent troops where they didn't belong. Clinton escalated. And then Republican pressure made Clinton remove troops when they were attacked. It DIRECTLY led to 9/11.

Katie's question was the best one all night.

And Obama flubs. We lost Osama BEFORE we invaded Iraq. And Afghanistan is not the central front. Does he get his intel from a children's book? Reading an 8 ball? On the toilet reading the funnies?

Obama had a Rick James moment. "We need to invade Pakistan" "No One called for the Invasion of Pakistan." You see...cocaine is a hell of a drug.

The reason they don't like us in Pakistan is because they have a LOT of radical Muslims.

We ARE demanding Iraq take responsibility. We are sending troops to Afghanistan as we pull them out of Iraq. If it was 2005, this would be a good point. But it's almost 2009. He's out of touch.

McCain gets it right. Safety procedes progress. If the people are not safe they will not make political and social progress. And he shows he was right about Putin.

Yea, the dude who wants to spend out money to rebuild all the former Soviet Union countries is gonna have spending cuts. What a joke.

We didn't rush into Iraq. We spent a decade getting into it.

Good for McCain for saying that he'd support Israel against Iran.

Again with diplomacy with Iran. That's not the solution. The time for diplomacy has passed. We DO talk to our enemies. He's such a tool.

If Obama learns everything from his radical wife...I am terrified.

The commentators got it right. Unless you've follow politics, it was hard to see the differences on them.

If you're on the government dole you shouldn't get to vote. You'll just vote yourself more money. Stupid college students should be denied.

And everybody agrees that McCain won, but didn't do enough to overcome Obama's lead.

Friday, October 03, 2008

A Few Musings on the Debate

Biden clearly lost for one reason tonight…he couldn’t be Biden. Like him or not, Biden has taken multiple positions that are now at odds with his running mate. During the primaries he said Obama wasn’t ready to lead, and mocked him for believing violence would go down if we simply left. He can’t do that anymore. And since Barack is always bringing it up, it’s not like Biden can duck the issue. So he’s got to do this weird sort of contortion act, where he completely stops being Joe Biden to be an Obama sycophant. It doesn’t work. He seems uncomfortable in the role, and it seems impossible to pull off for Biden, who does seem (to me) to be a man of principles. So he’s now trying to sell these beliefs that he doesn’t share and doesn’t buy himself. It creates a lot of openings to hammer him, and Palin did just that…all night. Biden got caught in lie after lie after lie, and Palin just laid into him.

(more...)

Thursday, September 04, 2008

But Don’t Question Their Patriotism

Even if they refuse to give a soldier a room

A hotel that refused an injured soldier a room, forcing him to spend the night in his car, was backed into issuing a grovelling apology yesterday after receiving a barrage of abusive phone calls.
The Metro Hotel, in Woking, Surrey, called the police as its phone lines were flooded with angry and threatening calls from the public.
The attack on the switchboards came after it emerged that Corporal Tomos Stringer, 24, had been told that it was company policy not to accept members of the Armed forces.
A soldier since the age of 16 and veteran of multiple tours in Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan, Corporal Stringer had travelled to Surrey to help with funeral preparations for a friend killed in action.
The corporal, who was not in uniform, presented his warrant card when asked by the hotel for proof of identity. After being refused a room, he had to bed down in his car, with his wrist, broken during a convoy ambush, encased in plaster.

That it’s the hotel’s policy to shun veterans is shameful. Good for everyone who called in to shame the hotel into an apology.

Crossposted

The Worst Attack on Palin So Far

Not Surprisingly from Planned Parenthood

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com)—As news of the pregnancy of vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s daughter Bristol makes the headlines, she is coming under attack from backers of pro-abortion candidate Barack Obama. But few have gone as far as former Planned Parenthood president Gloria Feldt, who suggested Palin is making her daughter keep the baby.
“She probably feels powerless right now,” Feldt said on Tuesday responding to the news about Bristol Palin.
Feldt said Governor Palin’s pro-life views may have made it so she and her husband Todd prevented Bristol from getting an abortion.
“Because of her family’s attitude she probably doesn’t feel that she has a choice in terms of what will happen to her,” Feldt said.

Not only is Palin not a woman, she’s forcing her child into slavery! /sarcasm

What a twisted worldview. Assuming that the girl looks at her child as a burden and her family is forcing her to have it is a sign of sickness. As the article nicely sums up:

“In Gloria Feldt’s bizarre world, families that cherish children are toxic. If the goal is to reduce the number of abortions, surely the first step is to allow families to love and embrace their children, not reject the weak and inconvenient,” Wright said.

But the goal of Planned Parenthood has never been to reduce abortions. If abortions stop Planned Parenthood goes out of business. These are twisted people who see babies as a curse. As Obama said “I don’t want my daughters ‘punished’ with a baby.

The Question I’m Sick of Hearing

Why Not Mitt Romney?

As McCain ran up to his announcement for VP, one of the most absurd demands made on him was that he draft Romney as his vice. Even before the pick was announced, this was a weird rallying cry for conservatives “Romney or bust”, but now AFTER the pick, it’s utter insanity.

Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not some huge Palin fan, but Romney? Please.

In order to shore up support with the conservative base that hates him, McCain was going to pick the one man who was to his left on almost every issue? That’d inspire hope in conservatives. And would’ve ushered in the first ever Democrat 49-1 state sweep ever.

While Romney is charismatic and likable in debates, he’s got a record to rival Hillary Clinton in the liberal department. Matched up to Palin, the man looks like a conservative lightweight.

Romney ignored his faith to become the only pro-choice Mormon in history. His support of gay marriage is pretty well documented. He was in favor of McCain’s amnesty plan and has never been serious about illegal immigration. His record on taxes is mixed at best, with him STILL refusing to endorce the Bush tax cuts.

And most importantly, while all of his supporters love to credit his private industry successes…as a public official, he almost bankrupted his state with the ridiculoud “Romneycare” proposal, that put Hillary care to shame.

Romney wasn’t the worst candidate in the bunch, but any honest supporter has to realize that Romney and McCain was a losing ticket to at least 4 years of Obama.

Crossposted

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Why Pakistan Should Matter to Us

Ill Take: “They have massive ammounts of WMDs and are going to elect a psychopath for 500 Alex?”

If there’s a case to be made against democracy, few countries make it better than Pakistan.
On Saturday, Pakistani legislators will elect a new president to replace Pervez Musharraf, the general-turned-strongman who resigned the office last month.
In one corner there is Mushahid Hussain Sayed, a former journalist and one-time political prisoner of Mr. Musharraf who is nonetheless running as the candidate of the general’s old party. Mr. Mushahid, probably the best of the bunch, stands next to no chance of winning.
In another corner there is Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, candidate of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s party. Mr. Sharif—whose record includes bankrupting his country, presiding over a disastrous military campaign against India, and attempting to implement Sharia law while awarding himself near-dictatorial powers—has made it clear he intends to gut the powers of the presidency should he return to office.
And then there is Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of slain former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and leader of the Pakistan People’s Party. Mr. Zardari, who has compared himself to Jesus (an innocent accused of crimes he did not commit), is easily one of the most notorious figures in the long parade of horribles that make up the country’s political history. He is, of course, expected to win Saturday’s ballot handily.
Just how bad is Mr. Zardari? It would be a relief if it were true that he was merely suffering from dementia, a diagnosis offered by two New York psychiatrists last year. But that diagnosis seems to have been produced mainly with a view toward defending himself against corruption charges in a British court.

Read the whole thing.

Thank God Musharraf resigned, right? Right? Ah crap.

Crossposted

Monday, September 01, 2008

Another Shocker!

Men want women. Women want men.

WHAT A TWIST!

Who knew?

It was the feminist dream of the 1960s – a world in which men and women share the load equally.
But it seems the fairer sex has all but abandoned the struggle. According to research published today, most men want a traditional wife – and women are often only too happy to oblige.
In turn, it claims that the husband women most desire is a ‘retrosexual’ – meaning they are more hunter gatherer than a ‘metrosexual’ stay-at-home father.
...
Tanya Jackson, corporate affairs manager at the building society, said: ‘A lot of women used to think they wanted a metrosexual man.
‘But then they realised they were fed up with a man who spent longer in the bathroom than they did.
‘Many women now feel they actually want a hunter-gatherer and they will look after their man in return.’

Despite a constant drumbeat about how women and men should be interchangable, they aren’t. We are born with different natures and seek out the other to complete ourselves. While lots of people bought into the feminist claptrap, it didn’t take long to see that the Feminist Empress had no clothes and, even worse, no grasp of reality.
While women tried the guru’s nonsense for years, the basic nature of women told them they wanted a real man. Because gender roles aren’t “societally defined”, they are genetically instilled. While every girl wanted the sensative guy who was into girly movies, once she had it…she was disappointed. The feminist noise ruined a lot of families and left a lot of broken people. But basic human nature is correcting new age silliness. Even the feminists are abandoning their fancy ideas. Little Miss “like fish need a bicycle” has even gotten married. Stupid ideas can only hold out so long against people’s basic nature. It’s about time the cycle is correcting itself.

Crossposted

Another Step Towards Victory

Iraqis take control of once-bloody Anbar province

BAGHDAD - American forces on Monday handed over security responsibility to the Iraqis in a province that the U.S. once feared was lost — a sign of the stunning reversal of fortunes since local Sunnis turned against al-Qaida in Iraq.
But a Sunni Arab leader criticized the Shiite-led government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki for failing to embrace its newfound allies, underlining the threat that sectarian tensions still pose to a lasting peace.
Nevertheless, the transfer of Anbar province, the cradle of the Sunni insurgency and the birthplace of al-Qaida in Iraq, marked a dramatic milestone in America’s plan to eventually hand over all 18 provinces to Iraqi control so U.S. troops can go home.
The 25,000 American troops remaining in Anbar will focus on training Iraq’s military and police forces and standing by to help if the Iraqis are unable to cope with any surge in violence.

If Obama had had his way, we’d have been turning over Anbar to al Quida, not to the Iraq government. Remember that everytime says that Obama was right on Iraq. Al Quida would’ve been just like putting Saddam back in power.

That’s not change. That’s more of the same.

Crossposted at Insane Reindeer

Oh Mr. Biden

Even though it’s been days since it happened, Joe Biden’s speech to the Democratic Nation Convention, to accept his vice Presidental part of the ticket has stuck with me. Much has been made of other pronouncements the man has made, and his record examined, but to see the measure of the man, I don’t think we have to look beyond this one speech.
That’s the America that George Bush has left us, and that’s the future John McCain will give us. These are not isolated discussions among families down on their luck. These are common stories among middle-class people who worked hard and played by the rules on the promise that their tomorrows would be better than their yesterdays.

That promise is the bedrock of America. It defines who we are as a people. And now it’s in jeopardy. I know it. You know it. But John McCain doesn’t get it.

...

John McCain is my friend. We’ve known each other for three decades. We’ve traveled the world together. It’s a friendship that goes beyond politics. And the personal courage and heroism John demonstrated still amaze me.

But I profoundly disagree with the direction that John wants to take the country. For example,

John thinks that during the Bush years “we’ve made great progress economically.” I think it’s been abysmal.

And in the Senate, John sided with President Bush 95 percent of the time. Give me a break. When John McCain proposes $200 billion in new tax breaks for corporate America, $1 billion alone for just eight of the largest companies, but no relief for 100 million American families, that’s not change; that’s more of the same.

Even today, as oil companies post the biggest profits in history--a half trillion dollars in the last five years--he wants to give them another $4 billion in tax breaks. But he voted time and again against incentives for renewable energy: solar, wind, biofuels. That’s not change; that’s more of the same.

Millions of jobs have left our shores, yet John continues to support tax breaks for corporations that send them there. That’s not change; that’s more of the same.

He voted 19 times against raising the minimum wage. For people who are struggling just to get to the next day, that’s not change; that’s more of the same.

And when he says he will continue to spend $10 billion a month in Iraq when Iraq is sitting on a surplus of nearly $80 billion, that’s not change; that’s more of the same.

...

As we gather here tonight, our country is less secure and more isolated than at any time in recent history. The Bush-McCain foreign policy has dug us into a very deep hole with very few friends to help us climb out. For the last seven years, this administration has failed to face the biggest forces shaping this century: the emergence of Russia, China and India as great powers; the spread of lethal weapons; the shortage of secure supplies of energy, food and water; the challenge of climate change; and the resurgence of fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the real central front against terrorism.

...

Again and again, on the most important national security issues of our time, John McCain was wrong, and Barack Obama was proven right.

Folks, remember when the world used to trust us? When they looked to us for leadership? With Barack Obama as our president, they’ll look to us again, they’ll trust us again, and we’ll be able to lead again.


The John McCain painted by Joe Biden is not a great person. He doesn’t care about the poor. He refuses to help those who struggle, while going out of his way to make the rich richer, at the expense of the poor. He refuses to give cheap affordable energy to everyone, and instead wants us to continue to fund terrorism. He has emboldened our enemies and is making Americans less safe. Quite frankly, his foreign policy will end up killing scores of Americans, both soldier and civilian, and will lead to piles of dead bodies. Because of McCain, Israel may be annihilated, Georgia razed by Russia, Tibet run over with Chinese tanks. All because McCain won’t just sit down and talk with these people and tell them the error of their ways. This John McCain is pretty damned evil, or, at the very least, cruelly indifferent. This John McCain has killed the American dream!

So why the hell is this man Joe Biden’s friend? Why the hell would Joe Biden have a 30 year friendship with such a man, who is responsible for so much suffering? As Biden himself would say:
You know, I believe the measure of a man isn’t just the road he’s traveled; it’s the choices he’s made along the way.


So, for 30 years, Joe Biden has willingly associated with McCain. Either McCain is the monster he is, and Biden overlooked it, working on legislation with him out of political expediancy, or Biden is lying about his long time friend, and villifying him to advance his political career. Either way that’s the bedrock of Washington politics. And, as Joe Biden now likes to say:
“That’s not change; that’s more of the same.”


Crossposted at Looking at the Left From the Left

 1 2 3 >  Last »
Page 1 of 4 pages