Say Anything Blog

Perhaps during the American Revolution those still loyal to the Queen felt as true conservatives do now: Disappointed, worried, isolated, and on the brink of surrender at the prospects of a nation about to change forever.

Obama puts a stone in my stomach when he proposes legislation that allows the government “new powers to seize key companies whose failure jeopardizes the financial system, as well as creation of a watchdog agency to look out for consumers’ interests.”

But on top of this is something new.  ABC News is turning programming over to Obama and White House officials to push for government run health care on a show called “Perscription for America”.

Despite Obama’s promise for bipartisanship, the show will exclude the opposing view.
Folks, Obama is INTENT on Nationalized Healthcare.

The story is developing… I would read more @
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashaot.htm

Don’t you think that Colmes reminds us of our poor, old, weasley, and quiet Letterman?  And doesn’t Hannity remind you of the loud, impending, down-your-throat Bill O’Reilly?

Sidenote: before anyone attacks, I love Bill O’Reilly.

They are lesser versions of their more-successfull archetypes in the business.

I don’t question Colmes for leaving, but really praise a man who made that difference by crossing over and being in FNC.  Although FNC may not be “conservative”, it is to the liberals.  He, in many minds, had taken camp in the heart of enemy territory; quite noble, in my mind.  It is what separates him from Letterman, Hannity, but not so much O’Reilly.

I praise not one party over the other, but praise only an instance of what I think are good moral practices in politics. 

Colmes should be remembered for his bipartisanship, because he certainly won’t be remembered for much else, the quiet fool! (...Hahahaha).  It is the general idea that this soft-spoken man did not (or could not) do much for his party, but I think he has done something for the cause of bipartisanship.

Goodbye Colmes.

The news may be late but the issue is still pertinent.  Is Rush Limbaugh overstepping his responsibilities as a reporter in Operation Chaos: his instructions that his listeners switch over and vote for Hillary in Indiana to create for a chaotic and drawn-out battle against Obama, weakening the nominee?

The difference he substantiated by his instructions, as reported by him, enabled Hillary to win.  If so, then he has successfully tampered with the votes--an incredible power.

Is it too much power? The Democrats DO have television, and Rush has talk-radio. I want your thoughts.