Rob did a great job dissecting the Forum’s pathetic coverup of Kent Conrad wide.  One thing that I think deserves pointing out is this:

In the past several days, he’s fired off stern letters to The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and The Bismarck Tribune, blasting them for “breathtaking … disregard for the facts” and “serious inaccuracies” in their editorials criticizing him for something he has said he never sought or knew he had.

So let’s see two of the most respected newspapers and the only serious non-Forum newspaper property in the state are in trouble for covering the story.  The Fargo Forum and it’s sister properties are good because they’ve been covering up.  I find it funny because the Washington Post has never been accused of being tough on liberals. 

Thanks for the admission that your the Senator’s lapdog Forum.

By the way Rob’s put in a dig on the reporter probably drawing pay from the Conrad camp for being a PR flack.  I don’t think it’s her fault.  This full cover for Conrad/Dorganoff policy is made way above her pay grade. 

Meanwhile Forum Communication readers still don’t know that Kent Conrad waived the budget rules in order to benefit Countrywide.  Why is that?