If she didn’t want the kid she didn’t want the kid. It wasn’t out of her yet so it’s still her body. *shrug*
TW - 06:08pm on 08/23/2006
If she didn’t want the baby, why didn’t she demand a c-section and put the baby up for adoption?!? Either way required surgery of the abdomen. And the c-section would have reduced the risk to her life. There are many good people waiting to adopt that would have given that child a happy home.
BamaMomof5 - 06:08pm on 08/26/2006
Yeah lets look at the law shall we?
The law defines death in 2 ways NO brain waves and NO heartbeat a “unborn fetus” as we are calling a baby these days has BOTH by 6 weeks of preganancy
Shannon - 06:05am on 05/30/2007
I know this is a divisive issue and I know that most of you guys (and gals) oppose abortion, but what’s the alternative. There will always be women who don’t want to have kids (at least at one point in their lives) and making it illegal for them to kill their unborn baby would just bring back loads more back-room abortions. These often result in infertility and even death (but maybe she deserves it [- for being so promiscuous]) for the mother.
In this case, the woman was clearly a nutter and in need of extensive psychiatric treatment. Nuff said.
ManofFireandLight - 06:05am on 05/30/2007
IT’S HEARTBREAKING TO HAVE WOMEN HURTIN THEMSELVES JUST TO GET RID OF AN UNWANTED BABY. HOWEVER I BELIVE THAT JUST HOW IT IS HER FAULT FOR NOT USING PROTECTED SEX ITS ALSO OUR FAULT FOR MAKING ABORTIONS TO EXPENSIVE. SOMETIMES IN LIFE, JUST AS HARD AS THE DECISSION MIGHT BE, ABORTIONS ARE THE ONLY SOLUTION, HOWEVER IF THEY’RE HARD TO PAY FOR, PEOPLE HAVE TO BE LOOKING FOR OTHER LESS EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS.
I JUST WISH THERE WOULD’VE BEEN EASIER WAYS TO ABORT THESE BABIES
If she didn’t want the kid she didn’t want the kid. It wasn’t out of her yet so it’s still her body. *shrug*
If she didn’t want the baby, why didn’t she demand a c-section and put the baby up for adoption?!? Either way required surgery of the abdomen. And the c-section would have reduced the risk to her life. There are many good people waiting to adopt that would have given that child a happy home.
Yeah lets look at the law shall we?
The law defines death in 2 ways NO brain waves and NO heartbeat a “unborn fetus” as we are calling a baby these days has BOTH by 6 weeks of preganancy
I know this is a divisive issue and I know that most of you guys (and gals) oppose abortion, but what’s the alternative. There will always be women who don’t want to have kids (at least at one point in their lives) and making it illegal for them to kill their unborn baby would just bring back loads more back-room abortions. These often result in infertility and even death (but maybe she deserves it [- for being so promiscuous]) for the mother.
In this case, the woman was clearly a nutter and in need of extensive psychiatric treatment. Nuff said.
IT’S HEARTBREAKING TO HAVE WOMEN HURTIN THEMSELVES JUST TO GET RID OF AN UNWANTED BABY. HOWEVER I BELIVE THAT JUST HOW IT IS HER FAULT FOR NOT USING PROTECTED SEX ITS ALSO OUR FAULT FOR MAKING ABORTIONS TO EXPENSIVE. SOMETIMES IN LIFE, JUST AS HARD AS THE DECISSION MIGHT BE, ABORTIONS ARE THE ONLY SOLUTION, HOWEVER IF THEY’RE HARD TO PAY FOR, PEOPLE HAVE TO BE LOOKING FOR OTHER LESS EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS.
I JUST WISH THERE WOULD’VE BEEN EASIER WAYS TO ABORT THESE BABIES