Dave: What are they, then? Cocker spaniels? Of course they are human; they are human fetuses. You play word games while babies die. Shame on you!
robert108 - 07:09pm on 09/23/2006
I see. So unborn children in their mother’s wombs aren’t worthy of protection from murder, but pigs in pokes gets you all riled up.
Sometimes I forget what an idiot you are.
Rob - 07:09pm on 09/23/2006
So unborn children in their mother’s wombs aren’t worthy of protection from murder, but pigs in pokes gets you all riled up.
Neither group is worthy of protection from murder. Both actions (preventing the fetus from being born, slaughtering billions of animals each year) are immoral.
Sometimes I forget how dishonest you are when it comes to presenting my viewpoints.
Dave - 07:09pm on 09/23/2006
Dave: Come on; even you can’t pretend not to know that killing animals isn’t murder. They are our food. You fail with the analogy thing once again.
robert108 - 07:09pm on 09/23/2006
Both actions (preventing the fetus from being born, slaughtering billions of animals each year) are immoral.
Oh wait, now killing unborn children is immoral? This from a guy who has said that parents smothering their problem children isn’t immoral?
Perhaps it would be easier for me to present your viewpoints “honestly” if you were a little more consistent in advancing them.
Rob - 07:09pm on 09/23/2006
Because we all know everybody always has the same opinions. I’m sure you took that out of context.
I think some second charge should be pressed simply because (I assume) the mother intended to give birth and raise the child to be a productive member of society.
Absolutely. She should only be charged for one murder, not two.
Right. Because unborn babies aren’t people.
Must be wonderful to be able to wear those kind of moral blinders.
If the medical examiner determines that the baby took even one small breath on its own, the second murder charge is warranted.
Of course not. I’m glad we agree.
Rrright.... I’m the one wearing moral blinders.Dave: What are they, then? Cocker spaniels? Of course they are human; they are human fetuses. You play word games while babies die. Shame on you!
I see. So unborn children in their mother’s wombs aren’t worthy of protection from murder, but pigs in pokes gets you all riled up.
Sometimes I forget what an idiot you are.
Neither group is worthy of protection from murder. Both actions (preventing the fetus from being born, slaughtering billions of animals each year) are immoral.
Sometimes I forget how dishonest you are when it comes to presenting my viewpoints.
Dave: Come on; even you can’t pretend not to know that killing animals isn’t murder. They are our food. You fail with the analogy thing once again.
Oh wait, now killing unborn children is immoral? This from a guy who has said that parents smothering their problem children isn’t immoral?
Perhaps it would be easier for me to present your viewpoints “honestly” if you were a little more consistent in advancing them.
Because we all know everybody always has the same opinions. I’m sure you took that out of context.
I think some second charge should be pressed simply because (I assume) the mother intended to give birth and raise the child to be a productive member of society.