P’foot says “No, we did not mis-underestimate him, that is to say, we under-estimated him ! Very generous of you, Puzz!
Proof - 12:06pm on 06/22/2008
Yeah, you would think that but but but it is a neologism. Bush is #1 in neologisms.
Puzzlefeet - 12:06pm on 06/22/2008
Harding was not president during the Great Depression. And his presidency was not really a disaster. Just lackluster. And then he died of a heart attack two years into his first term.
Will Franklin - 12:06pm on 06/22/2008
Yeah, you would think that but but but it is a neologism.
but but but? You do motorboat impressions? Nice!
Proof - 12:06pm on 06/22/2008
Just wanted to make sure with a little bit of anticipation.
puzz’s opinions are always on the wrong side so one can be confident that the opposite of what she says will be true.
As far as Bushs low popularity, that was shaped by 7 years of negative media propaganda, lefty anti-war loonies and Dem partisonship. It will take a long time with future unbiased historians to undo the slanderous attack on Bushs character and policies.
docdave - 01:06pm on 06/22/2008
In the context of his time, with all the spineless RINOs, and the Dems who are really Communists and who think better of terrorists than of fellow Americans who have chosen a different Party, President Bush is a standout. Compared to great Republican Presidents of the past, however, he is rather lackluster.
No.
P’foot says “No, we did not mis-underestimate him, that is to say, we under-estimated him ! Very generous of you, Puzz!
Yeah, you would think that but but but it is a neologism. Bush is #1 in neologisms.
Harding was not president during the Great Depression. And his presidency was not really a disaster. Just lackluster. And then he died of a heart attack two years into his first term.
but but but? You do motorboat impressions? Nice!
Just wanted to make sure with a little bit of anticipation.
anticipation? carly simon! Also nice!
puzz’s opinions are always on the wrong side so one can be confident that the opposite of what she says will be true.
As far as Bushs low popularity, that was shaped by 7 years of negative media propaganda, lefty anti-war loonies and Dem partisonship. It will take a long time with future unbiased historians to undo the slanderous attack on Bushs character and policies.
In the context of his time, with all the spineless RINOs, and the Dems who are really Communists and who think better of terrorists than of fellow Americans who have chosen a different Party, President Bush is a standout. Compared to great Republican Presidents of the past, however, he is rather lackluster.
Certainly agree with you on this one!