SayAnything Blog
Wikipedia Won’t Let John Edwards Entry Be Updated With News About His Affair
Article | Full Version | Back
Rob - 01:07pm on 07/28/2008

This is EXACTLY why I laugh at & refuse to seriously accept any arguement made using wiki-pedia as the source.
From it’s very inception, it’s been very biased about the info it accepts.
THere was a time when groups of bloggers could “create facts” & post them there & it was very difficult to get the wrong info removed....even with copius other sources backing the request.

RebTex - 02:07pm on 07/28/2008

despite that reporting having been confirmed by Fox News.

“Confirmed by” and “Fox News” don’t belong in a sentence together. Maybe Fox should have the Enquirer fact-check the talking points they get from the WH every day. Nah. Weekly World News is way more appropriate.

JustSayin' - 02:07pm on 07/28/2008

THank you, just sayin’ for validating my arguement

RebTex - 03:07pm on 07/28/2008

Wikipedia is not a tabloid nor is it a newspaper.  It is irresponsible to post information such as the National Enquirer without independent confirmation of the information.  I seriously doubt that people are that interested in shilling for a foppish twit like Edwards....

Just sayin’

Carrick - 08:07am on 07/29/2008

shilling for a foppish twit like Edwards....

That’s a beautiful turn of phrase man. 

I couldn’t believe the hoopla concerning Mr. We’d Make the Lame Walk.  Why would anyone care?  Then I find out he’s on the short list to be VP!?!  This is a potential choice to add experience to the ticket!?!?!?!

FlyOnTheWall - 10:07am on 07/29/2008
Post a New Comment