SayAnything Blog
Why “Tax Cuts For The Rich” Is A Bunch Of Nonsense
Article | Full Version | Back
Rob - 12:02pm on 02/28/2007
Comments:  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

The tenth man (the richest), owns
the restaurant.

WOOF - 01:02pm on 02/28/2007

So?

Rob - 01:02pm on 02/28/2007

The tenth man (the richest), owns
the restaurant.

He’s still paying more the the rest combined besides proving the environment to have the meal in the first place.

The Whistler - 02:02pm on 02/28/2007

When you include subsidies for the poor like EIC, the bottom 20% actually get back about 5% of the income they’ve earned.  So they’d get about $5 back for showing up…

Carrick - 02:02pm on 02/28/2007

The tenth man (the richest), owns the restaurant.

Typical leftie distraction to obscure an obvious truth.  The example clearly does not support this invention.

robert108 - 02:02pm on 02/28/2007

Rob, excellent analogy.

Carrick is right.  The bottom 4 should get paid to eat dinner for free. It’s only “fair”.

R108, without obfuscation, what would Woof have to offer?

HG - 02:02pm on 02/28/2007

The bottom four don’t eat in the restaurant , they get leftovers at the kitchen door in the alley.

The bottom four get paid so they won’t
eat the tenth man.

When the restaurant is threatened the bottom four get uniforms and a rifle.

Without bread, there’s no law, freedom, justice

Danton?

WOOF - 02:02pm on 02/28/2007

Woof,

Without work, there is no bread.
Something 1-4 may never learn and always demand if the agreement isn’t changed.

HG - 02:02pm on 02/28/2007

More class warfare from Woof.  The bottom four are starving, even though they actually get money back from the rest of us.  And we make the poor fight our wars too!  Despite, of course, statistical data to the contrary which Woofie ignores.

Rob - 03:02pm on 02/28/2007

Arbeit macht Frei

WOOF - 03:02pm on 02/28/2007
Comments:  1 2 3 4 >  Last »
Post a New Comment