Who Is In Charge Of Foreign Policy, The President Or The New York Times?
New York Times, Duh.
freerepublicans.com - 08:11pm on 11/29/2006
don’t be too easy on the White House. This could have been an intentional leak by the White House. If it isn’t, then it leakege would suggest a significant level of incompentence within the White House. ..I think the former is more likely .....
aNONOMISLY - 09:11pm on 11/29/2006
There’s that word incompetence again. I suppose the White House forgot to turn on their mind control device, because that’s the only way I know to control what people say to the press....
I seriously doubt the administration would leak a document to their worst enemy the New York Times of all news papers. See how the NYT handled it? Predictably casting the story in the worst possible light.
Sometimes I wonder about your mental competency.
Carrick - 09:11pm on 11/29/2006
Would someone please explain to me just what was gained by the NYT publishing this classfied memo? In the past when they’ve published classified material they claimed “public interest” issues. The NSA wiretap issue is just one example.
Where is the “public interest” in publishing this internal memo? I can’t see what good it could have possibly done anyone other than al-qaeda and al-sadr.
Just another transparent attempt to discredit the prsident. Disgusting is too mild a word for it.
Pilgrim - 11:11pm on 11/29/2006
Why can’t the press just fellate the Bush admin like Fox news does? Goodammit.
Sparkie Arbuckle - 04:11am on 11/30/2006
[quotedon’t be too easy on the White House. This could have been an intentional leak by the White House. If it isn’t, then it leakege would suggest a significant level of incompentence within the White House. ..I think the former is more likely ..... ]
Thats debateable but I doubt it. The LEft tried blaming Rove on a leak one time and it never panned out. It doesn’t make sense to leak this stuff. I think eventually Bush is going to have to call out the NY times. I am surprised we have haven’t target it yet. But they are losing money that is the good side of things.
The NY times is nothing more than a mouth piece for the left wing loons and old europe.
goon - 05:11am on 11/30/2006
The NY times is nothing more than a mouth piece for the left wing loons and old europe.
And the islamic terrorists.
The Whistler - 05:11am on 11/30/2006
If the NYTimes is a left wing mouthpiece,
why did it support the invasion of Iraq?
Now, d’ja hear ‘bout Judy Miller?
She disappeared, babe
After drawin’ out all her hard-earned cash
And now MacHeath spends just like a sailor
Could it be our boy’s done somethin’ rash?
WOOF - 05:11am on 11/30/2006
This was an intentional “leak” from the White House. They wanted to let Maliki know to get his ducks in a row or we’re outta there but didn’t want the prez’s fingerprints on it.
New York Times, Duh.
don’t be too easy on the White House. This could have been an intentional leak by the White House. If it isn’t, then it leakege would suggest a significant level of incompentence within the White House. ..I think the former is more likely .....
There’s that word incompetence again. I suppose the White House forgot to turn on their mind control device, because that’s the only way I know to control what people say to the press....
I seriously doubt the administration would leak a document to their worst enemy the New York Times of all news papers. See how the NYT handled it? Predictably casting the story in the worst possible light.
Sometimes I wonder about your mental competency.
Would someone please explain to me just what was gained by the NYT publishing this classfied memo? In the past when they’ve published classified material they claimed “public interest” issues. The NSA wiretap issue is just one example.
Where is the “public interest” in publishing this internal memo? I can’t see what good it could have possibly done anyone other than al-qaeda and al-sadr.
Just another transparent attempt to discredit the prsident. Disgusting is too mild a word for it.
Why can’t the press just fellate the Bush admin like Fox news does? Goodammit.
[quotedon’t be too easy on the White House. This could have been an intentional leak by the White House. If it isn’t, then it leakege would suggest a significant level of incompentence within the White House. ..I think the former is more likely ..... ]
Thats debateable but I doubt it. The LEft tried blaming Rove on a leak one time and it never panned out. It doesn’t make sense to leak this stuff. I think eventually Bush is going to have to call out the NY times. I am surprised we have haven’t target it yet. But they are losing money that is the good side of things.
The NY times is nothing more than a mouth piece for the left wing loons and old europe.
And the islamic terrorists.
If the NYTimes is a left wing mouthpiece,
why did it support the invasion of Iraq?
This was an intentional “leak” from the White House. They wanted to let Maliki know to get his ducks in a row or we’re outta there but didn’t want the prez’s fingerprints on it.
I hate free press!!!