The part where they whine about Obama being asked legitimate questions.
That is total non-sense Rob.
1) They are complaining about presidential debates. Until we show another presidential debate that nit-picks two Republicans, we have no data to conclude bias of any sort, as it relates to Dem v. Rep.
2) What you suggest is a Dem bias, not Obama. For they are also including Hillary in their complaint.
You are way, way, way off here and you know it.
Hannitized - 04:04am on 04/20/2008
“Large majorities of our fellow Americans tell pollsters they’re deeply worried about the country’s direction…
... about the prospect of a Marxist for president!
Mickey - 06:04am on 04/20/2008
Not to dwell with “excessive emphasis on tangential ‘character’ issues ....”: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” - B. Hussein Obama - The Audacity of Hope (title taken from one of Rev Wright’s sermons). In over 1400 years, the “Religion of Peace” has killed over 200 million infidels and more to come. Heaven forbid anyone question St. Barack’s “character” or lack thereof.
patriotic - 06:04am on 04/20/2008
I stand corrected! sanni has exceeded 3000 rpms.
2Hotel9 - 07:04am on 04/20/2008
Barack Obama received more questions about flag lapels than he did about global warming. He received more questions about his former pastor than he did about health care.
How is it “liberal bias” to point this out?
todd - 09:04am on 04/20/2008
Barack Obama received more questions about flag lapels than he did about global warming. He received more questions about his former pastor than he did about health care.
Maybe people care more about the character and trustworthiness of a candidate for President than any facile promises he might make?
Proof - 09:04am on 04/20/2008
Until we show another presidential debate that nit-picks two Republicans
You’re kidding right? How about the republican youtube debate with the guy holding the Bible asking every candidate if they believed every word in it? That was a clear example of “nit-picking” Romney’s religion.
What about the debates where cnn and msnbc asked Guiliani about his girlfriend and where or not his children even liked him. Were those nit-picking questions or honest policy questions?
we have no data to conclude bias of any sort, as it relates to Dem v. Rep.
That is naive at best hannitized.
dougee - 09:04am on 04/20/2008
leftodd, no one cares what ignorance laden stupidity falls out of his mouth concerning the environazi jihad against agriculture and industry.
2Hotel9 - 09:04am on 04/20/2008
Dougee,
Your question was a bit non-sensical. Why do they have to complain about Republican debates if they care about what Democrats think? If they are concerned about what Democrats are doing for them, why should they care? Shouldn’t Repubicans care about Republican debates, and in turn, complain about those? Or does that make them pro-Romney????
See below.
Michelle Malkin has been the blogger most closely advancing the research on exactly who asked the questions at the debate, and at present count, nearly 30% of all questions asked were from planted questioners. That is to say, the various Democratic Presidential campaigns put out questions to the Republican candidates, and instead of picking questions from the constituency of the Republican base, CNN decided to wave through folks into the debate who would never vote for any of the candidates in an effort to shape their image in what they hoped would be an embarrassing way.
The first one discovered was actually addressed by Anderson Cooper on air: Retired Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr asked candidates “why you think that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians.” It was later found out that Kerr was named a co-chairman of the group this month, according to a campaign press release, and was also active in John F. Kerry’s 2004 campaign for president.
Sparking suspicion amongst the conservative blogosphere, Malkin and many others began investigating the other questioners (with really clever techniques, like clicking on their YouTube profile links). Redstate blog had this to say about the initial discover:
So once again. Rob has confused his audience.
There is no “Obama bias” if the post was about why issues weren’t discussed. And its a false argument for Republicans to care why a Democratic debate should appeal to Republican voters.
Or are you guys hypocrites who want double standards?
Hannitized - 11:04am on 04/20/2008
So why will Obamoid not release a detailed proposal for his Administration? Got a snappy answer for that, racebaitingpovertypimp?
That is total non-sense Rob.
1) They are complaining about presidential debates. Until we show another presidential debate that nit-picks two Republicans, we have no data to conclude bias of any sort, as it relates to Dem v. Rep.
2) What you suggest is a Dem bias, not Obama. For they are also including Hillary in their complaint.
You are way, way, way off here and you know it.
... about the prospect of a Marxist for president!
Not to dwell with “excessive emphasis on tangential ‘character’ issues ....”: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” - B. Hussein Obama - The Audacity of Hope (title taken from one of Rev Wright’s sermons). In over 1400 years, the “Religion of Peace” has killed over 200 million infidels and more to come. Heaven forbid anyone question St. Barack’s “character” or lack thereof.
I stand corrected! sanni has exceeded 3000 rpms.
Barack Obama received more questions about flag lapels than he did about global warming. He received more questions about his former pastor than he did about health care.
How is it “liberal bias” to point this out?
Maybe people care more about the character and trustworthiness of a candidate for President than any facile promises he might make?
You’re kidding right? How about the republican youtube debate with the guy holding the Bible asking every candidate if they believed every word in it? That was a clear example of “nit-picking” Romney’s religion.
What about the debates where cnn and msnbc asked Guiliani about his girlfriend and where or not his children even liked him. Were those nit-picking questions or honest policy questions?
That is naive at best hannitized.
leftodd, no one cares what ignorance laden stupidity falls out of his mouth concerning the environazi jihad against agriculture and industry.
Dougee,
Your question was a bit non-sensical. Why do they have to complain about Republican debates if they care about what Democrats think? If they are concerned about what Democrats are doing for them, why should they care? Shouldn’t Repubicans care about Republican debates, and in turn, complain about those? Or does that make them pro-Romney????
See below.
So once again. Rob has confused his audience.
There is no “Obama bias” if the post was about why issues weren’t discussed. And its a false argument for Republicans to care why a Democratic debate should appeal to Republican voters.
Or are you guys hypocrites who want double standards?
So why will Obamoid not release a detailed proposal for his Administration? Got a snappy answer for that, racebaitingpovertypimp?