Some people just don’t get it. When we were attacked on 9/11/01, we were, and are in a state of war. Social Democrats have shown their willingness to give away our freedoms for their survival. I understand that. They just will not tell The Truth about their behaviors.
Chief RZ - 02:10pm on 10/23/2006
Here’s the deal: after years of relentless “stay the course” rhetoric, suddenly Bush is trying to pretend that “stay the course” has never been his strategy. It’s bizarre.
On ABC’s This Week yesterday, Bush said,
We’ve never been ‘stay the course’.
Dan Bartlett this morning said,
It’s never been a ‘stay the course’ strategy.
Yet Rob claims Bush is NOT reversing his ‘stay the course’ rhetoric.
The lefties are saying that ... he is reversing his “stay the course” rhetoric. Which is total nonsense.
Who should we believe, Bush or Rob?
The thing is, it’s a little late for Bush to be “considering options” now. Bush and Rumsfeld should have actually planned the occupation back in 2003, rather than just letting it happen. And they should have let the military take Zarqawi out before the war rather then keeping him around as a war propaganda prop.
At this point, tremendous damage has been done which can not be reversed. There’s no way to undo the ethnic cleansing of the neighborhoods of Baghdad. There’s a lot of bad blood between the Sunnis and the Shiites, and Iraq is headed in the wrong direction.
Some people just don’t get it. When we were attacked on 9/11/01, we were, and are in a state of war. Social Democrats have shown their willingness to give away our freedoms for their survival. I understand that. They just will not tell The Truth about their behaviors.
Here’s the deal: after years of relentless “stay the course” rhetoric, suddenly Bush is trying to pretend that “stay the course” has never been his strategy. It’s bizarre.
On ABC’s This Week yesterday, Bush said,
Dan Bartlett this morning said,
Yet Rob claims Bush is NOT reversing his ‘stay the course’ rhetoric.
Who should we believe, Bush or Rob?
The thing is, it’s a little late for Bush to be “considering options” now. Bush and Rumsfeld should have actually planned the occupation back in 2003, rather than just letting it happen. And they should have let the military take Zarqawi out before the war rather then keeping him around as a war propaganda prop.
At this point, tremendous damage has been done which can not be reversed. There’s no way to undo the ethnic cleansing of the neighborhoods of Baghdad. There’s a lot of bad blood between the Sunnis and the Shiites, and Iraq is headed in the wrong direction.