I’ll go with Duchamp.
It’s art or anti-art.
Nude Descending a Staircase
Do you think that is art, Woof?
WOOF - 06:04pm on 04/16/2008
Answer the question. I know it’s Duchamp…
I want your opinion, really.
More imporantly, do you like it?
No need to expose me to the arts...look at my avatar : P
dirl126 - 07:04pm on 04/16/2008
Btw, Pparets, I think it’s photoshopped.
Check the lighting, and Bush in the foreground.
His shoulders could have easily been shopped right onto the picture.
dirl126 - 07:04pm on 04/16/2008
*Both of them are photoshopped.
dirl126 - 07:04pm on 04/16/2008
I served with Art
I knew Art
Art was a friend of mine
Duchamp, you’re no Art.
realitybasedbob - 07:04pm on 04/16/2008
Dirl: I found two ‘sources’ for the photo. On each, it still looks photoshopped. There is something wrong with the proportions, angles and intense shadows under the president’s shoes in an area which is enfused with soft light.
pparets - 07:04pm on 04/16/2008
I think it is art.
It expresses the idea
of the readymade
on society has a historical
place in modern art.
I’d rather have a Caravaggio
on my wall.
WOOF - 07:04pm on 04/16/2008
Then art is is!
I made quite a scene in the Tate when I came across an exhibit of dada.
I am sure the patrons thought I was part of the art.
I was rebuked by a stern matron, a tsk tsk as I recall, and went on to the Turners and Blakes.
realitybasedbob - 07:04pm on 04/16/2008
If someone wanted to photoshop an embarrassing photo of Bush, that would not be it.
no
I’ll go with Duchamp.
It’s art or anti-art.
Nude Descending a Staircase
Answer the question. I know it’s Duchamp…
I want your opinion, really.
More imporantly, do you like it?
No need to expose me to the arts...look at my avatar : P
Btw, Pparets, I think it’s photoshopped.
Check the lighting, and Bush in the foreground.
His shoulders could have easily been shopped right onto the picture.
*Both of them are photoshopped.
I served with Art
I knew Art
Art was a friend of mine
Duchamp, you’re no Art.
Dirl: I found two ‘sources’ for the photo. On each, it still looks photoshopped. There is something wrong with the proportions, angles and intense shadows under the president’s shoes in an area which is enfused with soft light.
I think it is art.
It expresses the idea
of the readymade
on society has a historical
place in modern art.
I’d rather have a Caravaggio
on my wall.
Then art is is!
I made quite a scene in the Tate when I came across an exhibit of dada.
I am sure the patrons thought I was part of the art.
I was rebuked by a stern matron, a tsk tsk as I recall, and went on to the Turners and Blakes.
If someone wanted to photoshop an embarrassing photo of Bush, that would not be it.