The war in the pacific was a much simpler situation, fighting an actual nation, not an ideology. The targets were clear and it was just a case of bodycounts.I think it is a bit of a cheap shot to liken the problems of today to the dropping of the bomb. We won’t know if Bush truly took the right course for decades to come probably…
But we were at war then, and at war now, so I guess it’s all related. It’s all about the means justifying the ends and how they will be judged.
William Oreilly - 09:08pm on 08/06/2005
Liberal lunatics not only can’t wait for the war to end before calling it a failure (and apparently they forgot that wars don’t equal one mission) they couldn’t wait for the war to begin before foretelling of the disasterous quagmire that was sure to come.
The war in the pacific was a much simpler situation, fighting an actual nation, not an ideology. The targets were clear and it was just a case of bodycounts.I think it is a bit of a cheap shot to liken the problems of today to the dropping of the bomb. We won’t know if Bush truly took the right course for decades to come probably…
But we were at war then, and at war now, so I guess it’s all related. It’s all about the means justifying the ends and how they will be judged.
Liberal lunatics not only can’t wait for the war to end before calling it a failure (and apparently they forgot that wars don’t equal one mission) they couldn’t wait for the war to begin before foretelling of the disasterous quagmire that was sure to come.
Write ‘em. I just did. Email the Editor, USA Today
Opinion belongs in the editorial section. It’s offensive to see it in the news section.