An incumbent’s popularity reflects on his party’s designated successor.
Hairy Polemic - 09:05pm on 05/12/2008
It’s not as if the agendized MSM polls are accurate.
robert108 - 09:05pm on 05/12/2008
An incumbent’s popularity reflects on his party’s designated successor.
That’s true to a point, but Bush still isn’t on the ballot in November because McCain isn’t Bush. Period.
Rob - 10:05pm on 05/12/2008
That’s true to a point, but Bush still isn’t on the ballot in November because McCain isn’t Bush. Period.
Yes, but you’re reading into things here. Granted, the media can be retarded in its reporting, but this one makes a newsworthy point. If this were a “conservative” publication, then Republicans would read it and go, “Good to know, I was worried that Bush’s unpopularity would affect our chances next year.”
Hairy Polemic - 05:05am on 05/13/2008
A gift from Marie…
realitybasedbob - 05:05am on 05/13/2008
The mainstream media’s recitation of the of the anti-Bush line tells us that the Democrats aren’t about to explain in detail what they are actually going to do if elected. Barack Obama’s entire campaign has been focused on “Change” without without explicitly stating what that change consists of. We’re being told who and what they aren’t… not who and what they are.
Bat One - 06:05am on 05/13/2008
I kind of liked the line Obama tossed out, well spoken and seemed “Hope” ful. He invited me to go to his web site and read his agenda so I did. The guy is a naive, arrogant and angry man with a tendency to solve problems by using a tighter and tighter grip.
All he really has going for him is Hope and Change and the media is helping as much as possible. It’s going to hurt his campaign when people look at his specific plans.
FlyOnTheWall - 07:05am on 05/13/2008
The MSM has made their choice and what they have chosen is what we are likely to get come November. It doesn’t matter to them what Obama brings to the table--the Democrats in congress will set the agenda and rule through legislation. Hello to Nancy and Harry and Ted and Steney and Leahy and Waxman and Boxer; et al.
Halatbis - 07:05am on 05/13/2008
The MSM has made their choice and what they have chosen is what we are likely to get come November.
An incumbent’s popularity reflects on his party’s designated successor.
It’s not as if the agendized MSM polls are accurate.
That’s true to a point, but Bush still isn’t on the ballot in November because McCain isn’t Bush. Period.
Yes, but you’re reading into things here. Granted, the media can be retarded in its reporting, but this one makes a newsworthy point. If this were a “conservative” publication, then Republicans would read it and go, “Good to know, I was worried that Bush’s unpopularity would affect our chances next year.”
A gift from Marie…
The mainstream media’s recitation of the of the anti-Bush line tells us that the Democrats aren’t about to explain in detail what they are actually going to do if elected. Barack Obama’s entire campaign has been focused on “Change” without without explicitly stating what that change consists of. We’re being told who and what they aren’t… not who and what they are.
I kind of liked the line Obama tossed out, well spoken and seemed “Hope” ful. He invited me to go to his web site and read his agenda so I did. The guy is a naive, arrogant and angry man with a tendency to solve problems by using a tighter and tighter grip.
All he really has going for him is Hope and Change and the media is helping as much as possible. It’s going to hurt his campaign when people look at his specific plans.
The MSM has made their choice and what they have chosen is what we are likely to get come November. It doesn’t matter to them what Obama brings to the table--the Democrats in congress will set the agenda and rule through legislation. Hello to Nancy and Harry and Ted and Steney and Leahy and Waxman and Boxer; et al.
Was this true in 2000 and 2008?
2004