Well said. And in the end, the Blue States will still be able to keep their murder mills open in the inner cities to perform genocide on 1 in 3 African American pregnancies and perform the 57% of the abortions that occur on Hispanics and Blacks while trumpeting how they are trying to help blacks and Hispanics achieve equality by murdering their children while still in the womb.
Justin B - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
I wonder if they’ll need to build more jails to house women and doctors who break the law. Would they arrest North Dakotans who cross the border into South Dakota?
Ryan - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
Ryan, it doesn’t take but one or two times to prosecute lawbreakers and the others will change their behaviors. It doesn’t matter what law is made, it needs to be enforced. Now flight to avoid prosecution could involve a federal crime.
Chief RZ - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
Do you think pregnant women will be placed under house arrest in order to prevent them from leaving the state to get an abortion?
Ryan - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
"I wonder if they’ll need to build more jails to house women and doctors who break the law. "
I think the better question is, will they build more Emergency Rooms to treat the women who turn to the wire hangers.
modern instances - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
I think the better question is, will they build more Emergency Rooms to treat the women who turn to the wire hangers.
Right. Because women can’t just stop having abortions. They’ll obviously have to turn to hurting themselves. Because it isn’t like adoption is an option or anything.
Honestly, could you guys get any more hysterical?
Rob - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
It’s not being hysterical, Rob - we’re simply wondering what the effect of the South Dakotan law will be.
Will North Dakotans who have had or performed an abortion be arrested if they go to South Dakota? Can South Dakota arrest people who commit a crime in a different state? Or can they arrest only residents of South Dakota, not non-residents?
If a woman travels to Fargo, has an abortion performed, and travels back, how long would she be in jail?
If a doctor performs an abortion in the state, even to save the mother’s life, how long will he go to jail?
I’m wondering, because I can see North Dakota following SD’s footsteps and it worries me.
Ryan - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
"Right. Because women can’t just stop having abortions. They’ll obviously have to turn to hurting themselves. "
Bingo.
"Because it isn’t like adoption is an option or anything."
So how’s your adoption going? I assume you’re adopting at least one of these unwanted children, you’re so gung-ho on the idea.
modern instances - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
Oh, and it’s interesting as well that South Dakota did not include any provisions in its law for education, pre- or post-natal care, promotion of alternatives to abortion, such as adoption, etc.
Abortions should be safe, legal, and extremely rare - this law does not do anything to promote safety or even to lower the number of abortions. It’s not difficult for someone to get in a car and drive to Fargo.
Additionally, creating the economic conditions where having a child won’t put the parents in the poorhouse is extremely important - abortions are cheaper than raising a child, which is much more scandalous than abortions themselves.
Ryan - 07:02am on 02/23/2006
But, honestly, Chief or Rob, will pregnant women be placed under house arrest to prevent them from leaving the state if they’re thought to be pro-choice?
Also, what would the punishment be for someone who aids and abets - a person drives a lady to get an abortion. How long would that person go to jail?
Well said. And in the end, the Blue States will still be able to keep their murder mills open in the inner cities to perform genocide on 1 in 3 African American pregnancies and perform the 57% of the abortions that occur on Hispanics and Blacks while trumpeting how they are trying to help blacks and Hispanics achieve equality by murdering their children while still in the womb.
I wonder if they’ll need to build more jails to house women and doctors who break the law. Would they arrest North Dakotans who cross the border into South Dakota?
Ryan, it doesn’t take but one or two times to prosecute lawbreakers and the others will change their behaviors. It doesn’t matter what law is made, it needs to be enforced. Now flight to avoid prosecution could involve a federal crime.
Do you think pregnant women will be placed under house arrest in order to prevent them from leaving the state to get an abortion?
"I wonder if they’ll need to build more jails to house women and doctors who break the law. "
I think the better question is, will they build more Emergency Rooms to treat the women who turn to the wire hangers.
Right. Because women can’t just stop having abortions. They’ll obviously have to turn to hurting themselves. Because it isn’t like adoption is an option or anything.
Honestly, could you guys get any more hysterical?
It’s not being hysterical, Rob - we’re simply wondering what the effect of the South Dakotan law will be.
Will North Dakotans who have had or performed an abortion be arrested if they go to South Dakota? Can South Dakota arrest people who commit a crime in a different state? Or can they arrest only residents of South Dakota, not non-residents?
If a woman travels to Fargo, has an abortion performed, and travels back, how long would she be in jail?
If a doctor performs an abortion in the state, even to save the mother’s life, how long will he go to jail?
I’m wondering, because I can see North Dakota following SD’s footsteps and it worries me.
"Right. Because women can’t just stop having abortions. They’ll obviously have to turn to hurting themselves. "
Bingo.
"Because it isn’t like adoption is an option or anything."
So how’s your adoption going? I assume you’re adopting at least one of these unwanted children, you’re so gung-ho on the idea.
Oh, and it’s interesting as well that South Dakota did not include any provisions in its law for education, pre- or post-natal care, promotion of alternatives to abortion, such as adoption, etc.
Abortions should be safe, legal, and extremely rare - this law does not do anything to promote safety or even to lower the number of abortions. It’s not difficult for someone to get in a car and drive to Fargo.
Additionally, creating the economic conditions where having a child won’t put the parents in the poorhouse is extremely important - abortions are cheaper than raising a child, which is much more scandalous than abortions themselves.
But, honestly, Chief or Rob, will pregnant women be placed under house arrest to prevent them from leaving the state if they’re thought to be pro-choice?
Also, what would the punishment be for someone who aids and abets - a person drives a lady to get an abortion. How long would that person go to jail?