Kerry is as intellectually gawky and ungainly as he is fundamentally dishonest and unprincipled. And as of today, he has effectively removed himself from any further serious consideration for the 2008 Democrat presidential nomination.
Not that it really much mattered, but Hillary has one less obstacle to be concerned with now.
Bat One - 06:11pm on 11/03/2006
Kerry is an out-of-touch narcissist. His supporters are slackers and opportunists.
Kevin - 06:11pm on 11/03/2006
In the fantasy fog land of liberal thought, where the meaning and application of the word “IS” can be brought into question during a grand jury investigation,(and be accepted by blockheads as a credible defense) a non-apology can really be an apology--or not--or can be--or not---depending on the immediate (or previous) or future situational circumstances.
See, it’s wide open--anything can mean nothing or everything at anytime......this way, no one can ever be held accountable at all
When considering the truth of a proposition, one is either engaged in an honest appraisal of the evidence and logical arguments, or one isn’t.
Maybe--yes--no--sometimes---it depends on perception--oh but--my truth is my truth and your truth is your truth--who’s to say who’s right or wrong?-- two diametrically opposed and contradictory statements can be true at the same time--because er.... and nothing that’s been written is factual because it reflects the bias of the writer...yadda yadda yadda.......ad infinitum ad nauseam.
Bezu Fache - 01:11am on 11/04/2006
Once again, Kerry’s babysitting media has to scramble to give us a hundred contortions of “what he meant to say.”
No sooner had Kerry’s camp emerged with a convoluted explanation of his remarks being a “botched joke” at the expense of the president (whose name was never mentioned in Kerry’s offending remarks) than the Old Media elites picked up those talking points and ran with them.
Read: Buttressing a Beleaguered Kerry
Bezu Fache - 03:11am on 11/04/2006
Clearly he meant what he said at the start, and then lied about misspeaking, and is now essentially admitting that he meant what he said.
Not only is he a classic example of the intellectually bankruptcy of the left, he is just a complete retard. Is this really the best the left could find to run against Bush in 2004???
Carrick - 06:11am on 11/04/2006
Has anybody on this blog commented on the Heritage Foundation study yet comparing Army recruits to their peers? That makes complete mincemeat of the Seattle PI article (which frankly is nothing more than an opinion piece wrapped in the guise of news).
"Can Kerry be this dumb?”
DUH!
Kerry is as intellectually gawky and ungainly as he is fundamentally dishonest and unprincipled. And as of today, he has effectively removed himself from any further serious consideration for the 2008 Democrat presidential nomination.
Not that it really much mattered, but Hillary has one less obstacle to be concerned with now.
Kerry is an out-of-touch narcissist. His supporters are slackers and opportunists.
In the fantasy fog land of liberal thought, where the meaning and application of the word “IS” can be brought into question during a grand jury investigation,(and be accepted by blockheads as a credible defense) a non-apology can really be an apology--or not--or can be--or not---depending on the immediate (or previous) or future situational circumstances.
See, it’s wide open--anything can mean nothing or everything at anytime......this way, no one can ever be held accountable at all
When considering the truth of a proposition, one is either engaged in an honest appraisal of the evidence and logical arguments, or one isn’t.
Maybe--yes--no--sometimes---it depends on perception--oh but--my truth is my truth and your truth is your truth--who’s to say who’s right or wrong?-- two diametrically opposed and contradictory statements can be true at the same time--because er.... and nothing that’s been written is factual because it reflects the bias of the writer...yadda yadda yadda.......ad infinitum ad nauseam.
Once again, Kerry’s babysitting media has to scramble to give us a hundred contortions of “what he meant to say.”
No sooner had Kerry’s camp emerged with a convoluted explanation of his remarks being a “botched joke” at the expense of the president (whose name was never mentioned in Kerry’s offending remarks) than the Old Media elites picked up those talking points and ran with them.
Read: Buttressing a Beleaguered Kerry
Clearly he meant what he said at the start, and then lied about misspeaking, and is now essentially admitting that he meant what he said.
Not only is he a classic example of the intellectually bankruptcy of the left, he is just a complete retard. Is this really the best the left could find to run against Bush in 2004???
Has anybody on this blog commented on the Heritage Foundation study yet comparing Army recruits to their peers? That makes complete mincemeat of the Seattle PI article (which frankly is nothing more than an opinion piece wrapped in the guise of news).
A 4th guilty gop finally resigned
Army recruiters caught on tape
Gop Rep.’s own people dropped a dime on him
bushco’s boys in the back not down wid it no more
Silly (re: corrupt) Creationist found guilty, faces 200 years
bushco moves to enforce his new version of our first amendment
“There wasn’t anybody down there who gave a hoot about intelligence spending”
But hey lets talk about Kerry some more.
Boob, if you don’t like my choice in topics start up your own reader blog.
What’s the matter? Afraid your B.S. won’t stand up to scrutiny?
I’m not surprised.
Carrick, I haven’t seen anyone comment on that study yet.