The left is actively trying to steal this election,
Your tin-foil hat is frying your brian. Where are the cases where the accusations match the conviction?
If this person was registered (3) times, with (2) addresses, that means at least one of them is registered at the same address. So how is that person going to vote twice, at the same precinct?
Hint: he cant.
Hannitized - 09:10am on 10/08/2008
I hold in my formerly nicotine stained fingers (rustles a piece of paper) a letter that Obama says he wrote and waved in the face of one of the members of ACORN, (acorn, that’s a type of nut, isn’t it?) saying that it may or may not be a good idea if they stopped committing voter fraud.
I got them from Bill Burkett.
Onslaught - 09:10am on 10/08/2008
So how is that person going to vote twice, at the same precinct?
I wonder how many Acorn trained poll workers will be checking these people as they come in to vote.
Hungry Bear - 09:10am on 10/08/2008
How special!
Zsa Zsa - 09:10am on 10/08/2008
If this person was registered (3) times, with (2) addresses, that means at least one of them is registered at the same address. So how is that person going to vote twice, at the same precinct?
Hint: he cant.
- Lying Liberal, Hannitized
He might not be able to, but he certainly can vote twice, once in each precinct.
I see you’re still working hard to remain irrelevant. Hey, whatever works, right? LIAR.
Bullwinkle - 10:10am on 10/08/2008
He might not be able to, but he certainly can vote twice, once in each precinct.
If this was in fact that same guy, how do you imagine he submitted three registration cards?
Was he at his friends house when ACORN came buy and he registered from his friends house? Then, when they came by his house he registered again?
Or, is it your argument that the Acorn representative encouraged him to fill out three cards?
How is this ACORNs fault and were is the evidence it is their fault?
You don’t have any evidence of anything, except an accusation.
I remember when the press convicted several men of raping a black stripper once, based on nothing but what they think they knew.
Hannitized - 10:10am on 10/08/2008
I don’t know about my Nevada, but in my state you can votw without even showing legal ID.
That in itself is an invitation to voter fraud.
Combine democrat oposition to voters showing ID at the polls with voter registration fraud being carried out by democrat special interests, and you can see where this is going.
Hungry Bear - 10:10am on 10/08/2008
Hungry Bear,
In case you don’t know, your complaint goes both ways. If Republicans want to cheat, they can cheat as well. The law does not suggest that only Republicans show ID.
What you fail to realize that when Republicans push for voters to show IDs, that is a method of preventing a vote to occur. The Republicans rather prevent a vote. That is what you call voter suppression.
Hannitized - 11:10am on 10/08/2008
Hey Hannitized. Keeping voters (or wannabe voters) from committing voter fraud is not a Republican dirty trick. It’s only rebuffing a Democratic dirty trick! How many dead democrats from Chicago are going to vote for Obama this cycle? Answer: Way too many!
forest - 11:10am on 10/08/2008
I have two ballots show up at my house every election. One in my maiden name and one in my married name. (I have told the lovely government workers that we have up here in the liberal enclave of Oregon, but they still keep coming.) And because I live in Oregon, I never have to visit a poll. All ballots are mailed in. Therefore, were I of the mindset of these folks, I could indeed vote twice.
The system relies a lot on personal integrity. It’s sad that our country seems to be heavily lacking in this attribute as of late.
My opinion: I think that you should be required to show up to vote. It is important enough for people to work their schedules around voting. Absentee ballots should also be destroyed unless you are deployed on business of our government. Voting is a responsiblity. Government of the people, for the people, by the people only works when the people participate.
And as far as the I.D. issue goes… why is this even in question? You have to show I.D. to buy a bottle of wine or to write a check at the grocery store or to board a plane or a thousand other examples. Why would someone object to showing it when voting unless they were trying to do something deceptive?
We have truly lost common sense. Guess it should be renamed… ‘uncommon sense’?
Your tin-foil hat is frying your brian. Where are the cases where the accusations match the conviction?
If this person was registered (3) times, with (2) addresses, that means at least one of them is registered at the same address. So how is that person going to vote twice, at the same precinct?
Hint: he cant.
I hold in my formerly nicotine stained fingers (rustles a piece of paper) a letter that Obama says he wrote and waved in the face of one of the members of ACORN, (acorn, that’s a type of nut, isn’t it?) saying that it may or may not be a good idea if they stopped committing voter fraud.
I got them from Bill Burkett.
I wonder how many Acorn trained poll workers will be checking these people as they come in to vote.
How special!
He might not be able to, but he certainly can vote twice, once in each precinct.
I see you’re still working hard to remain irrelevant. Hey, whatever works, right? LIAR.
If this was in fact that same guy, how do you imagine he submitted three registration cards?
Was he at his friends house when ACORN came buy and he registered from his friends house? Then, when they came by his house he registered again?
Or, is it your argument that the Acorn representative encouraged him to fill out three cards?
How is this ACORNs fault and were is the evidence it is their fault?
You don’t have any evidence of anything, except an accusation.
I remember when the press convicted several men of raping a black stripper once, based on nothing but what they think they knew.
I don’t know about my Nevada, but in my state you can votw without even showing legal ID.
That in itself is an invitation to voter fraud.
Combine democrat oposition to voters showing ID at the polls with voter registration fraud being carried out by democrat special interests, and you can see where this is going.
Hungry Bear,
In case you don’t know, your complaint goes both ways. If Republicans want to cheat, they can cheat as well. The law does not suggest that only Republicans show ID.
What you fail to realize that when Republicans push for voters to show IDs, that is a method of preventing a vote to occur. The Republicans rather prevent a vote. That is what you call voter suppression.
Hey Hannitized. Keeping voters (or wannabe voters) from committing voter fraud is not a Republican dirty trick. It’s only rebuffing a Democratic dirty trick! How many dead democrats from Chicago are going to vote for Obama this cycle? Answer: Way too many!
I have two ballots show up at my house every election. One in my maiden name and one in my married name. (I have told the lovely government workers that we have up here in the liberal enclave of Oregon, but they still keep coming.) And because I live in Oregon, I never have to visit a poll. All ballots are mailed in. Therefore, were I of the mindset of these folks, I could indeed vote twice.
The system relies a lot on personal integrity. It’s sad that our country seems to be heavily lacking in this attribute as of late.
My opinion: I think that you should be required to show up to vote. It is important enough for people to work their schedules around voting. Absentee ballots should also be destroyed unless you are deployed on business of our government. Voting is a responsiblity. Government of the people, for the people, by the people only works when the people participate.
And as far as the I.D. issue goes… why is this even in question? You have to show I.D. to buy a bottle of wine or to write a check at the grocery store or to board a plane or a thousand other examples. Why would someone object to showing it when voting unless they were trying to do something deceptive?
We have truly lost common sense. Guess it should be renamed… ‘uncommon sense’?