Well, NYC can pick and choose which part of the Constitution is more equal than others. Strange though, if one is talking about guns that somehow the 2nd Amendment should be censored out of the discussion.
Chief RZ - 11:05am on 05/09/2008
With the Supreme Court ruling the the DC handgun case due within the next 6 weeks or so, and every indication that the Second Amendment will be vigorously upheld, I can’t imagine that Judge Weinstein is so doddered that he would think that a ruling in favor of the City’s motion won’t get shot down on appeal.
I wonder if Michael Bloomberg isn’t maneuvering for a shot as Obama’s VP nominee?
Bat One - 11:05am on 05/09/2008
I can’t imagine that Judge Weinstein is so doddered that he would think that a ruling in favor of the City’s motion won’t get shot down on appeal.
So, you’re suggesting he keep his powder dry?
Proof - 12:05pm on 05/09/2008
B1: I think you wrote the primer on this kind of ruling! Weinstein will probably only be a shell of his former self when he is through!
I think the DC ruling is going to go Number one, with a bullet!
Proof - 12:05pm on 05/09/2008
Sorry to provide a break from the puns, but it seems to me that Bloomberg’s trying to get his quote inserted into the definition for “begging the question.” Yeesh.
Bike Bubba - 12:05pm on 05/09/2008
Proof,
I get a real charge out of this stuff. And I believe you’re right on target with your assessment of the upcoming DC ruling. It should trigger a massive reassessment of our gun control laws across the country, including NYC, and those liberals who keep trying to ignore or rationalize away the Second Amendment are going to be positively shell-shocked.
Bat One - 12:05pm on 05/09/2008
Judge Weinstein might think he’s over a barrel because of this case! It’s by no means a lock!
Bloomberg’s stock could rise with the libs, though!
Proof - 12:05pm on 05/09/2008
(Some of B1’s puns are a flash in the pan, though!)
Proof - 12:05pm on 05/09/2008
B1: I must be off to the dentist soon,(Hope he doesn’t bust any caps!) so do not doubt the flint of my resolve in answering any puns in my absence. I shall prove a match for you any day!
Proof - 12:05pm on 05/09/2008
I think we should keep our sights trained on what goes on his Judge Weinstein’s chamber. If the DC ruling hits the target sooner than expected there’ll be a whole new round of consultations and motions in the NYC case.
Well, NYC can pick and choose which part of the Constitution is more equal than others. Strange though, if one is talking about guns that somehow the 2nd Amendment should be censored out of the discussion.
With the Supreme Court ruling the the DC handgun case due within the next 6 weeks or so, and every indication that the Second Amendment will be vigorously upheld, I can’t imagine that Judge Weinstein is so doddered that he would think that a ruling in favor of the City’s motion won’t get shot down on appeal.
I wonder if Michael Bloomberg isn’t maneuvering for a shot as Obama’s VP nominee?
So, you’re suggesting he keep his powder dry?
B1: I think you wrote the primer on this kind of ruling! Weinstein will probably only be a shell of his former self when he is through!
I think the DC ruling is going to go Number one, with a bullet!
Sorry to provide a break from the puns, but it seems to me that Bloomberg’s trying to get his quote inserted into the definition for “begging the question.” Yeesh.
Proof,
I get a real charge out of this stuff. And I believe you’re right on target with your assessment of the upcoming DC ruling. It should trigger a massive reassessment of our gun control laws across the country, including NYC, and those liberals who keep trying to ignore or rationalize away the Second Amendment are going to be positively shell-shocked.
Judge Weinstein might think he’s over a barrel because of this case! It’s by no means a lock!
Bloomberg’s stock could rise with the libs, though!
(Some of B1’s puns are a flash in the pan, though!)
B1: I must be off to the dentist soon,(Hope he doesn’t bust any caps!) so do not doubt the flint of my resolve in answering any puns in my absence. I shall prove a match for you any day!
I think we should keep our sights trained on what goes on his Judge Weinstein’s chamber. If the DC ruling hits the target sooner than expected there’ll be a whole new round of consultations and motions in the NYC case.