Puzzle, tell us in your own words why your party favors pulling out of Iraq and handing a victory to the terrorists.
Rob - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
According to this article the Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled information on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq under Saddam Hussein’s regime.
your link leads us to read this
500,000 are estimated to have died in Saddam’s needless war with Iran.
but we propped up Saddam and encouraged him to fight against Iran!!?
Sparkie Arbuckle - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
Sparkie, nice cherry pick. This is the pertinent part of that particle:
The Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled documentation on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq.
You should at least try to be honest.
Rob - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
Sparkie, nice cherry pick. This is the pertinent part of that particle:
The Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled documentation on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq.
You should at least try to be honest.
And we are directly causally involved in all those deaths for putting the Bathe party into power and giving them lots of guns.
Sparkie Arbuckle - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
My party? Geez Rob, where have you been lately? Did you hear Sen Warner that there needs to be significant progress within three months or their needs to be a change in strategy. What happened to stay the course, is he now a cut and runner?
And rob, perhaps you can tell us why we didn’t really fight this war?
Puzzlefeet - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
And we are directly causally involved in all those deaths for putting the Bathe party into power and giving them lots of guns.
Our mistakes in the past shouldn’t reflect on our current policy, which is the correct one. We support representative democracy and oppose tyrants.
The Bush doctrine states that we have, for too long, supported tyranny for the sake of stability in the middle east. All that has changed.
Rob - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
Answer the question and don’t distract Puzzle: Why does your party support leaving Iraq and handing a victory to the terrorists?
I guess ‘fessing up that your party is against victory in Iraq is hard to do.
Rob - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
Our mistakes in the past shouldn’t reflect on our current policy, which is the correct one. We support representative democracy and oppose tyrants.
A digression from the fact that your source for the # of deaths Saddam was responsible for included also deaths we (the US) is a causal actor/enabler of in Saddam’s body count…
The Bush doctrine states that we have, for too long, supported tyranny for the sake of stability in the middle east. All that has changed.
Naw. We are against Iran, with an elected leader, simply because he’s an extremist - an extremist who never would have had the support he got if we weren’t over there fucking around. Yet, we are for Musharef, Qaddafi, the dude from Kazakystan… the list goes on. Rob, you are full of shit. You better bet your ass that if the Bush Admin could put in a cold hard killer tyrant in as leader of Iraq… a guy who supported and listened to us… they’d do it in a second. This whole democracy excuse is so much bullshit. We don’t care if they vote. They’ll vote for somebody like Amadinajad. Bet your ass they will.
Sparkie Arbuckle - 06:10am on 10/11/2006
rob, why don’t you ask an intellectually honest question instead of the “when did you stop beating your wife” question, then perhaps I’ll answer you.
I’m really glad we are back to debating the Iraq War.
read the entire thing: http://www.cookpolitical.com/
Puzzle, tell us in your own words why your party favors pulling out of Iraq and handing a victory to the terrorists.
your link leads us to read this
but we propped up Saddam and encouraged him to fight against Iran!!?
Sparkie, nice cherry pick. This is the pertinent part of that particle:
You should at least try to be honest.
And we are directly causally involved in all those deaths for putting the Bathe party into power and giving them lots of guns.
My party? Geez Rob, where have you been lately? Did you hear Sen Warner that there needs to be significant progress within three months or their needs to be a change in strategy. What happened to stay the course, is he now a cut and runner?
And rob, perhaps you can tell us why we didn’t really fight this war?
Our mistakes in the past shouldn’t reflect on our current policy, which is the correct one. We support representative democracy and oppose tyrants.
The Bush doctrine states that we have, for too long, supported tyranny for the sake of stability in the middle east. All that has changed.
Answer the question and don’t distract Puzzle: Why does your party support leaving Iraq and handing a victory to the terrorists?
I guess ‘fessing up that your party is against victory in Iraq is hard to do.
A digression from the fact that your source for the # of deaths Saddam was responsible for included also deaths we (the US) is a causal actor/enabler of in Saddam’s body count…
Naw. We are against Iran, with an elected leader, simply because he’s an extremist - an extremist who never would have had the support he got if we weren’t over there fucking around. Yet, we are for Musharef, Qaddafi, the dude from Kazakystan… the list goes on. Rob, you are full of shit. You better bet your ass that if the Bush Admin could put in a cold hard killer tyrant in as leader of Iraq… a guy who supported and listened to us… they’d do it in a second. This whole democracy excuse is so much bullshit. We don’t care if they vote. They’ll vote for somebody like Amadinajad. Bet your ass they will.
rob, why don’t you ask an intellectually honest question instead of the “when did you stop beating your wife” question, then perhaps I’ll answer you.