Or how about if someone said, “I won’t vote for you because you are a Muslim, or Gay, or a woman, or a negro! By goodness, they would be pilloried by the MSM. JJ and Al as well as the whole UJA would be chanting outside their house for their head. Literally.
Chief RZ - 04:05pm on 05/29/2007
Typical Democrat.
The Whistler - 04:05pm on 05/29/2007
typical east coast elitist liberal.
goon - 04:05pm on 05/29/2007
I’d like to know why this made headlines. It’s doubtful that the media would report any other religious attack on a candidate of any other religion.
Chief RZ, I seriously doubt anyone would say a word if they said “woman” but I do understand your point of the statement and totally agree.
Anna - 05:05pm on 05/29/2007
Anna, Thank you for the adult reply. I disagree, although women have the #2 or 3 trump card now. The NOW et al would be all over this as well as the liberal newspapers, CNN, MSNBC and the like.
Chief RZ - 06:05pm on 05/29/2007
Well Chief RZ, I certainly do hope you are not implying that because I’m a female you therefore expected less then an adult response.
Just teasing and once again I’ll have to agree with you about the NOW cult err.. I mean organization and the others.
Anna - 06:05pm on 05/29/2007
Well ! Anna. Glad to occasionally have a tease from a female.
Seriously, no, not at all. The adult remark is from Dr. Eric Berne’s Transactional analysis: Parent-Adult-Child
In my opinion, NOW is a liberal wing of the Democratic party.
Chief RZ - 07:05pm on 05/29/2007
This story was old news before it happened. The on-going assault by those on the left on the courtesies and civilities that once held our society together, the vile language, the hateful ad hominem, the insults, the verbal and physical assaults on conservative speakers, the sheer, preponderant nastiness by liberals toward those whose viewpoint is different, these things are now so tediously ubiquitous, that the in-your-face belligerent bigotry of one more Democrats is hardly worthy of note.
Bat One - 08:05pm on 05/29/2007
Hmm ... Bat One I wouldn’t say it’s not worthy. After all, it did give your furry lil’ butt the opportunity to get out of your cave and state your opinion. And, what’s a blog without opinions?
Anna - 08:05pm on 05/29/2007
Anna,
Bravo! In a very modest, three sentence comment you managed to avoid the point of that on which you were commenting, attack the messenger, while glibly adding nothing of substance to the conversation.
Thank goodness I didn’t suggest that Democrats are stalwarts of principle and reason. Its so painfully disheartening to have admit overestimating one’s opponents.
Or how about if someone said, “I won’t vote for you because you are a Muslim, or Gay, or a woman, or a negro! By goodness, they would be pilloried by the MSM. JJ and Al as well as the whole UJA would be chanting outside their house for their head. Literally.
Typical Democrat.
typical east coast elitist liberal.
I’d like to know why this made headlines. It’s doubtful that the media would report any other religious attack on a candidate of any other religion.
Chief RZ, I seriously doubt anyone would say a word if they said “woman” but I do understand your point of the statement and totally agree.
Anna, Thank you for the adult reply. I disagree, although women have the #2 or 3 trump card now. The NOW et al would be all over this as well as the liberal newspapers, CNN, MSNBC and the like.
Well Chief RZ, I certainly do hope you are not implying that because I’m a female you therefore expected less then an adult response.
Well ! Anna. Glad to occasionally have a tease from a female.
Seriously, no, not at all. The adult remark is from Dr. Eric Berne’s Transactional analysis: Parent-Adult-Child
In my opinion, NOW is a liberal wing of the Democratic party.
This story was old news before it happened. The on-going assault by those on the left on the courtesies and civilities that once held our society together, the vile language, the hateful ad hominem, the insults, the verbal and physical assaults on conservative speakers, the sheer, preponderant nastiness by liberals toward those whose viewpoint is different, these things are now so tediously ubiquitous, that the in-your-face belligerent bigotry of one more Democrats is hardly worthy of note.
Hmm ... Bat One I wouldn’t say it’s not worthy. After all, it did give your furry lil’ butt the opportunity to get out of your cave and state your opinion. And, what’s a blog without opinions?
Anna,
Bravo! In a very modest, three sentence comment you managed to avoid the point of that on which you were commenting, attack the messenger, while glibly adding nothing of substance to the conversation.
Thank goodness I didn’t suggest that Democrats are stalwarts of principle and reason. Its so painfully disheartening to have admit overestimating one’s opponents.