Harry Reid, poor dear, is just having a hissy fit. He spent the past two years saying the war was lost, and now that the Marines and the Army and David Petraeus have proved him wrong he’s got his boxers in a bowline.
Once his hormones get straightened out again he’ll be back to his old, jovial, fulsome self. What a guy!
Bat One - 03:02pm on 02/12/2008
Ah yes, Code Pink and the Democrat Leadership supporting our troops the only way they know how. And Nancy’s support of “Surge Failure” continues.....
What I really dont get tho is why would anyone join a group that calls themselves “code pink” then attack pro-military supporters.... What are they looking for, a pillow fight?
Mark - 03:02pm on 02/12/2008
Musy have been a terrible , terrible fight.
Those Code Pink goons fight dirty.
WOOF - 04:02pm on 02/12/2008
Berkeley erupted in violence Tuesday morning when the Communist, terrorist-supporting anti-war group crossed into Martin Luther King Park and assaulted pro-troop individuals.
First of all, that’s the funniest sentence I’ve ever read. Code Pink is not just any anti-war group; oh no, they’re a Communist, terrorist-supporting anti-war group!
I think there is a very slight chance that the reporter of this article is very, very slightly biased, and that this bias may have altered his perception. Very slight, I know, but it’s still possible.
A prime example of that tolerance liberals are so famous for.
The following comments appeared in the comments section of the story you just linked to:
“This is what happens when you hire cops and city officials who are fags(...) Anyone not yet convinced that we need a revolution yet? (...) (C)an we nuke Berkeley? I think we need more parking (...)Can good Americans finally declare war on Berkeley and do everything humanly possible to make its residents as miserable as possible? (...) We should welcome altercations with these effeminate brownshirts. (...)I would like to see a seige on Berkley (...)”
Yeah.... intolerant liberals!
Todd - 05:02pm on 02/12/2008
Todd,
Because you can cite an example in a comment of intolerance doesn’t make the commi-lib code pink loons any more tolerant. In fact, comparatively speaking, code pink is the more intolerable by their own actions. It was code pink who resorted to physical violence. If the authorities will not intervene then those being assaulted are within their rights to defend themselves.
HG - 05:02pm on 02/12/2008
Todd, it’s amaing how it’s OBVIOUS bias if there is the slightest fairness with regards to the, for the want of a better word, conservative side; yet there is “no bias” in those stories (a la the NYT’s) where the language is slanted towards the “Progressive” mentality.
Harry Reid, poor dear, is just having a hissy fit. He spent the past two years saying the war was lost, and now that the Marines and the Army and David Petraeus have proved him wrong he’s got his boxers in a bowline.
Once his hormones get straightened out again he’ll be back to his old, jovial, fulsome self. What a guy!
Ah yes, Code Pink and the Democrat Leadership supporting our troops the only way they know how. And Nancy’s support of “Surge Failure” continues.....
What I really dont get tho is why would anyone join a group that calls themselves “code pink” then attack pro-military supporters.... What are they looking for, a pillow fight?
Musy have been a terrible , terrible fight.
Those Code Pink goons fight dirty.
First of all, that’s the funniest sentence I’ve ever read. Code Pink is not just any anti-war group; oh no, they’re a Communist, terrorist-supporting anti-war group!
I think there is a very slight chance that the reporter of this article is very, very slightly biased, and that this bias may have altered his perception. Very slight, I know, but it’s still possible.
The following comments appeared in the comments section of the story you just linked to:
“This is what happens when you hire cops and city officials who are fags(...) Anyone not yet convinced that we need a revolution yet? (...) (C)an we nuke Berkeley? I think we need more parking (...)Can good Americans finally declare war on Berkeley and do everything humanly possible to make its residents as miserable as possible? (...) We should welcome altercations with these effeminate brownshirts. (...)I would like to see a seige on Berkley (...)”
Yeah.... intolerant liberals!
Todd,
Because you can cite an example in a comment of intolerance doesn’t make the commi-lib code pink loons any more tolerant. In fact, comparatively speaking, code pink is the more intolerable by their own actions. It was code pink who resorted to physical violence. If the authorities will not intervene then those being assaulted are within their rights to defend themselves.
Todd, it’s amaing how it’s OBVIOUS bias if there is the slightest fairness with regards to the, for the want of a better word, conservative side; yet there is “no bias” in those stories (a la the NYT’s) where the language is slanted towards the “Progressive” mentality.