Think this is pretty funny. Former Reality star and former congressional candidate Raj Bhakta goes out in search of Fred Thompson on the campaign trail. funny stuff. here’s the link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=34eIaC7rWjU
check it out for a laugh.
matt - 01:01pm on 01/16/2008
Rob: “Overlawyering” Wow!! Now there’s some potent language of outrage from the most conservative candidate! Did Thompson also hurl his chai-latte across the room in a show of fury?
If thats his idea of “going after” opponents on a fundamntal constitutional rights issue, he should prove to be totally awesome when battling Hugo Chavez or Ahmadinijad!
I can hear it now… “Cease, you cad! You’re OVERLAWYERING!!” Hahaha
pparets - 04:01pm on 01/16/2008
I’d be more amused by Fred on this issue if he had not FIRST refused to pursue the Clinton’s regarding the CHINESE donations to their campaign funds AS CHAIR OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ASSIGNED TO INVESTIGATE THAT INCIDENT - being appointed as the CHAIR PERSON BECAUSE HE WAS A FORMER WATERGATE PROSECUTOR.
Under the cirsucmstances, since he refused to pursue the RIGHTFUL PROSECUTION of the DIM LIBERAL CLINTONS on felony charges amounting to TREASON, I’m not very entertained by his castigation of President Bush.
Even though I am a powerful supporter of the SECOND AMENDMENT.
Oh, yeah, I’m also a powerful supporter of the FIRST AMENDMENT, too - unlike Fred Thompson, of McCain Feingold THOMPSON. [Check with Ann Coulter and George Will, et al]
Ombre Rose - 04:01pm on 01/16/2008
Rob: “Overlawyering” Wow!! Now there’s some potent language of outrage from the most conservative candidate! Did Thompson also hurl his chai-latte across the room in a show of fury?
So, you’re not actually disagreeing with Thompson here, but criticizing his use of adjectives?
Wake me up when you post a comment worth reading.
Rob - 04:01pm on 01/16/2008
Rob: Actually I said worse on your ‘Exit Poll Romney’ post - or better, depending on one’s point-of-view.
pparets - 05:01pm on 01/16/2008
Rob: Actually I said worse on your ‘Exit Poll Romney’ post - or better, depending on one’s point-of-view.
Proud of that, are ya?
Rob - 05:01pm on 01/16/2008
STOP THE PRESSES!
Jason Spencer, reporter for the Spartanburg Herald - Journal who was covering this interview was asked why they hadn’t reported Fred’s comment on the delay tactic by the Bush administration where his quoted response was;
Thanks for your interest, and for your feedback. I’ve heard Thompson talk about the issue before, but commenting on something that he has no control over—a pending Supreme Court decision—seems to be simply pandering to the voters. That’s why it was left out.
Best,
Jason Spencer
Reporter, The Herald-Journal
(864) 562-7214, or
(800) 476-1025, Ext. 7214
No control over as a presidential candidate who therefore must be pandering....Can you believe this idiot!?!?
Winghunter - 05:01pm on 01/16/2008
Rob: Pride is not an issue. But, you did overlook some really important stats on Mitt. He won the liberal vote, the evangelical vote and got a whopping 58% just for being from Michigan.
pparets - 05:01pm on 01/16/2008
Winghunter: “Thompson pandering..” Good post! Thats exactly how the MSM manipulates what we know, who we hear and how we vote! Last week they turned their guns on McCain in Michigan and, I predict, they will turn them on Fred in SC - or worse - ignore him. The MSM has the general election set: Obama and Romney.
pparets - 06:01pm on 01/16/2008
What does this have to do with the Second Amendment genius?? What does this have to do with Bush playing more games??
...if he had not FIRST refused to pursue the Clinton’s regarding the CHINESE donations to their campaign funds
While John Glenn played legislative games to hold up the investigation, liberal agents spirited every witness or suspect back to China inwhich 22 people were eventually convicted. This is hard fact of every credible report on this issue and without a good initial investigation they wouldn’t have caught a soul. 22 is a very good conviction rate there Spinner.
Aren’t you tired of being proven ignorant? Why don’t you research this instead of parroting crap you hear from other idiots when you know damn well there is someone here who knows better and will delightfully jam it back down your throat!? Oh, I get it, you’re just a masochist in training.
THEN you bring up McCain-Feingold, AGAIN!? That does it! Hey Rob! Lets get a IQ test for entrance into this forum...only people with IQ’s ABOVE the number of their shoe size is allowed to respond...What do ya’ think?
Think this is pretty funny. Former Reality star and former congressional candidate Raj Bhakta goes out in search of Fred Thompson on the campaign trail. funny stuff. here’s the link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=34eIaC7rWjU
check it out for a laugh.
Rob: “Overlawyering” Wow!! Now there’s some potent language of outrage from the most conservative candidate! Did Thompson also hurl his chai-latte across the room in a show of fury?
If thats his idea of “going after” opponents on a fundamntal constitutional rights issue, he should prove to be totally awesome when battling Hugo Chavez or Ahmadinijad!
I can hear it now… “Cease, you cad! You’re OVERLAWYERING!!” Hahaha
I’d be more amused by Fred on this issue if he had not FIRST refused to pursue the Clinton’s regarding the CHINESE donations to their campaign funds AS CHAIR OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ASSIGNED TO INVESTIGATE THAT INCIDENT - being appointed as the CHAIR PERSON BECAUSE HE WAS A FORMER WATERGATE PROSECUTOR.
Under the cirsucmstances, since he refused to pursue the RIGHTFUL PROSECUTION of the DIM LIBERAL CLINTONS on felony charges amounting to TREASON, I’m not very entertained by his castigation of President Bush.
Even though I am a powerful supporter of the SECOND AMENDMENT.
Oh, yeah, I’m also a powerful supporter of the FIRST AMENDMENT, too - unlike Fred Thompson, of McCain Feingold THOMPSON. [Check with Ann Coulter and George Will, et al]
So, you’re not actually disagreeing with Thompson here, but criticizing his use of adjectives?
Wake me up when you post a comment worth reading.
Rob: Actually I said worse on your ‘Exit Poll Romney’ post - or better, depending on one’s point-of-view.
Proud of that, are ya?
STOP THE PRESSES!
Jason Spencer, reporter for the Spartanburg Herald - Journal who was covering this interview was asked why they hadn’t reported Fred’s comment on the delay tactic by the Bush administration where his quoted response was;
No control over as a presidential candidate who therefore must be pandering....Can you believe this idiot!?!?
Rob: Pride is not an issue. But, you did overlook some really important stats on Mitt. He won the liberal vote, the evangelical vote and got a whopping 58% just for being from Michigan.
Winghunter: “Thompson pandering..” Good post! Thats exactly how the MSM manipulates what we know, who we hear and how we vote! Last week they turned their guns on McCain in Michigan and, I predict, they will turn them on Fred in SC - or worse - ignore him. The MSM has the general election set: Obama and Romney.
What does this have to do with the Second Amendment genius?? What does this have to do with Bush playing more games??
While John Glenn played legislative games to hold up the investigation, liberal agents spirited every witness or suspect back to China inwhich 22 people were eventually convicted. This is hard fact of every credible report on this issue and without a good initial investigation they wouldn’t have caught a soul. 22 is a very good conviction rate there Spinner.
Aren’t you tired of being proven ignorant? Why don’t you research this instead of parroting crap you hear from other idiots when you know damn well there is someone here who knows better and will delightfully jam it back down your throat!? Oh, I get it, you’re just a masochist in training.
THEN you bring up McCain-Feingold, AGAIN!? That does it! Hey Rob! Lets get a IQ test for entrance into this forum...only people with IQ’s ABOVE the number of their shoe size is allowed to respond...What do ya’ think?