What if the father or stepfather of the girl is the father?
If we’re going to get into hypotheticals, try that one on for size.
Do you think that in that situation “she doesn’t want to tell you, her parent, because she knows you’ll get really mad at her” holds any more water than your entire premise?
If you can’t see the difference between a girl exercising control over her own body, and a Republican predator & deviant preying on boys, you are officially an apologist hack.
What if the girls father is the father? - 04:10am on 10/12/2006
I have to laugh at these enablers that are working to cover up these crimes.
They’ll come up with any excuse to keep the authorities in the dark about child molestation.
I wonder why that is?
The Whistler - 04:10am on 10/12/2006
What if the father or stepfather of the girl is the father?
If we’re going to get into hypotheticals, try that one on for size.
So...in an instance where a father is sexually abusing his child you think the best solution is to spirit the girl across state lines to get an abortion? Rather than, you know, turning the father into the authorities for sexually abusing his child?
Whistler has it right. That’s what an abuse enabler would do.
If you can’t see the difference between a girl exercising control over her own body, and a Republican predator & deviant preying on boys, you are officially an apologist hack.
Where’s the difference? If a sixteen year old girl can decide to keep her sex life and the fact that she’s going to kill her unborn child from her parents then why can’t a sixteen year old boy decide to have a relationship with an older man?
For my part I don’t support either situation, I’m just wondering how Democrats who oppose parental notification can support one but not the other.
Rob - 04:10am on 10/12/2006
They’ll come up with any excuse to keep the authorities in the dark about child molestation.
I wonder why that is?
Yeah, why did Hastert keep quiet all these years?
realitybasedbob - 04:10am on 10/12/2006
Yeah, why did Hastert keep quiet all these years?
Because he wasn’t aware of the extent of what Foley was doing?
But that’s beside the point of this post, boob. Tell me how your anti-parental-notification Democrats can support a sixteen year old girl having sex and getting abortions without her parent’s knowledge but oppose a sixteen year old boy having a relationship with an older man?
Seems pretty dang inconsistent to me.
Rob - 04:10am on 10/12/2006
P.S.
I’m quite sure it is acceptable for a teenager to provocatively email an adult.
As for the inverse, it is unacceptable and illegal (thanks in part to Rep. Foley’s diligent legislating) for an adult to provocatively email a child.
Make sense?
PS - 04:10am on 10/12/2006
Because he wasn’t aware of the extent of what Foley was doing?
What’s the name of Haster’s aide testifying later today?
realitybasedbob - 05:10am on 10/12/2006
I’m quite sure it is acceptable for a teenager to provocatively email an adult.
As a parent, I don’t find that acceptable at all.
Rob - 05:10am on 10/12/2006
Boob, let’s stay on topic.
How can Democrats support no parental notification for abortions, but be horrified at the thought of a boy above the age of consent having sex chat with an older man?
Rob - 05:10am on 10/12/2006
I’m quite sure it is acceptable for a teenager to provocatively email an adult.
As a parent, I don’t find that acceptable at all.
Tell that to the author of this thread, aka you:
So if that’s ok, then why can’t 16 year-old boys decide to have cybersex with U.S. Representatives?
I merely state that it is not illegal for the child to act in that matter. As for the adult, that is another matter.
I hope that, as a parent, and perhaps adult, that you understand some activities are not sanctioned between adults and children.
So in summary: you are advocating that girls made pregnant by family-members under the age of 18 must carry the baby to term (or notify said parents,) and you are advocating predatory behaviors by adults to children.
What if the father or stepfather of the girl is the father?
If we’re going to get into hypotheticals, try that one on for size.
Do you think that in that situation “she doesn’t want to tell you, her parent, because she knows you’ll get really mad at her” holds any more water than your entire premise?
If you can’t see the difference between a girl exercising control over her own body, and a Republican predator & deviant preying on boys, you are officially an apologist hack.
I have to laugh at these enablers that are working to cover up these crimes.
They’ll come up with any excuse to keep the authorities in the dark about child molestation.
I wonder why that is?
So...in an instance where a father is sexually abusing his child you think the best solution is to spirit the girl across state lines to get an abortion? Rather than, you know, turning the father into the authorities for sexually abusing his child?
Whistler has it right. That’s what an abuse enabler would do.
Where’s the difference? If a sixteen year old girl can decide to keep her sex life and the fact that she’s going to kill her unborn child from her parents then why can’t a sixteen year old boy decide to have a relationship with an older man?
For my part I don’t support either situation, I’m just wondering how Democrats who oppose parental notification can support one but not the other.
Yeah, why did Hastert keep quiet all these years?
Because he wasn’t aware of the extent of what Foley was doing?
But that’s beside the point of this post, boob. Tell me how your anti-parental-notification Democrats can support a sixteen year old girl having sex and getting abortions without her parent’s knowledge but oppose a sixteen year old boy having a relationship with an older man?
Seems pretty dang inconsistent to me.
P.S.
I’m quite sure it is acceptable for a teenager to provocatively email an adult.
As for the inverse, it is unacceptable and illegal (thanks in part to Rep. Foley’s diligent legislating) for an adult to provocatively email a child.
Make sense?
What’s the name of Haster’s aide testifying later today?
As a parent, I don’t find that acceptable at all.
Boob, let’s stay on topic.
How can Democrats support no parental notification for abortions, but be horrified at the thought of a boy above the age of consent having sex chat with an older man?
Tell that to the author of this thread, aka you:
I merely state that it is not illegal for the child to act in that matter. As for the adult, that is another matter.
I hope that, as a parent, and perhaps adult, that you understand some activities are not sanctioned between adults and children.
So in summary: you are advocating that girls made pregnant by family-members under the age of 18 must carry the baby to term (or notify said parents,) and you are advocating predatory behaviors by adults to children.
Very sick. Get help.