I thought you were about to teach me why the liberal was so offended?

Wrong on both counts.

Pilgrim,

While you are crafting (what will no doubt be) a thoughtful response to my query, would you consider renaming the title of this post?

I don’t equate the cowardly frat boys (that I chased off my lawn with a baseball bat after they defiled my political sign) with the entire conservative movement. Your equating this ‘Roderick King’ individual with the entire liberal community is hyperbolic, as best.

Wrong on both counts.

Bat,

You have a way of shouting out the obvious.

I knew Pilgrim wouldn’t dare attempt to explain why the dangerous liberal was so offended.

Surely it wouldn’t advance his case to point out that the liberal thinks it offensive that a christian would lord their moral superiority over a person who is contemplating the idea of abortion.

Surely he would not state that the christians, who see killing a cell as killing a life, are not suggesting that we see things their way.  Certainly by stating these folks are guilting people into seeing things their way would be an offense that would make someone tear down the crosses.

Why would Pilgrim admit that?

This clearly shows that liberals like Roderick King have no respect for free speech.  They can’t stand people with differing points of view being allowed their constitutional right of free speech.  Hannitized is clearly another example of this phenomenon.

Hannitized is clearly another example of this phenomenon.

How so peaches?  The only thing I did was explain why the act was offensive, not that reacting to it, in the way it was, was appropriate.

You, like so many of your counterparts, leap off a cliff with nothing more than faith and crossed fingers.  Heh.

Hannitized:

I knew Pilgrim wouldn’t dare attempt to explain why the dangerous liberal was so offended.

I had other things to attend to. If I ever hide under my bed it won’t be because of my fear of explaining myself to folks like you. Further, it was obvious why he was offended: I’ve explained it in my above comments.

And *:

would you consider renaming the title of this post?

No.

How so peaches?

Why does Hannitized call people “peaches” whenever he’s getting “creamed"?

You, like so many of your counterparts, leap off a cliff with nothing more than faith and crossed fingers.  Heh.

How am I leaping off a cliff?  I beg an answer butterscotch?

How am I leaping off a cliff? 

You must have leaped off the cliff to have landed on the inaccurate conclusion that I was supporting this guys actions.

It was pretty obvious.

Further, it was obvious why he was offended: I’ve explained it in my above comments.

I don’t think so.  I’ve looked....I don’t see it.