Wow: Senator Barbara Boxer Gets Scolded For Racial Condescension

Proof  •  July 16, 2009

Here’s Ed Morrissey’s description of the exchange:

Barbara Boxer wound up getting reamed by Harry Alford, the chair of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, after attempting to challenge his testimony on energy policy. When Boxer started waving position papers from the NAACP and the 100 Black Men of Atlanta, Alford called it a “condescending” attack and complained about Boxer’s focus on black people rather than science.

Here’s the video:


It’s always amusing to watch liberals – particular white liberals – get all huffy when someone who is of a minority race wanders off the liberal plantation. It’s as if you can’t be authentically black or Hispanic or what have you unless you also buy in to liberal dogma.
Because your skin color should define your politics, I guess.
And they call Republicans racist.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array carrick

    WOOF:

    Harry Alford, President and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce which took $275,000 from EXXoN .

    Look!

    Another gray-haired hippie theory.

  • bill-tb

    She probably just assumed everybody got the color code handouts, maybe dodo has an extra.

  • carrick

    Hannitized:

    More race baiting from Rob,

    Actually that was Barbara Boxer… They aren’t that easily confused.

    Glasses broken?

  • Hannitized

    More race baiting from Rob, and more cries of racism from sensitive Republicans who don’t know what real racism looks, or feels like.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    The real racists are in the Democrat party.

  • sayanything-4625

    Still no comments on Senator Sessions racist remarks during the confirmation hearings.

    What racist comments?

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    Wow. She actually said that the NAACP guy she quoted “should be proud” to be quoted. It’s like saying, “you should be thankful we let you in here.” I have never heard anything more blatantly racist.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Heh,

    Eunuchized, himself an apologist for racists accuses our host of race baiting.

    Can you say chutzpah? File it under H for hypocrisy.

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    And Hannitized,

    who don’t know what real racism looks, or feels like

    You truly are a presumptuous idiot for saying that.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    littledog,

    Are you really arguing that having taken money from Exxon makes Harry Alford (and the National Black Chamber of Commerce) less a member of the “black community.”?

  • Hannitized

    Whatever Hairy, but I have experienced real racism, and trust me, that ain’t it.

  • sayanything-4625

    Are you for real, Buzz?

  • Hannitized

    And notice how Rob didn’t have the courage to put in writing that Alford belongs to the National Black Chamber of Commerce, because it detracts from his criticism of being put in a category where skin color is mentioned.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Why yes, eunuchized, we do know your a practicing race baiter and apologist for racists.

    This is news why?

  • Hannitized

    Carrick,

    What did Boxer do, that is considered race-baiting, in your mind?

    Race baiting is an act of using racially derisive language, actions or other forms of communication, to anger, intimidate or incite a person or groups of people, or to make those persons behave in ways that are inimical to their personal or group interests. This can also be accomplished by implying that there is an underlying race based motive in the actions of others towards the group baited, where none in fact exists.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    For Hannah to claim he is of superior intellect is about the saddest thing I’ve read today.

    Well, he is probably the smartest guy he knows! (But then, that short bus only holds, what? Twelve?)

  • Hannitized

    Rob Port:
    “Because your skin color should define your politics, I guess.

    And they call Republicans racist.”

    Race Baiting:

    Race baiting is an act of using racially derisive language, actions or other forms of communication, to anger, intimidate or incite a person or groups of people, or to make those persons behave in ways that are inimical to their personal or group interests. This can also be accomplished by implying that there is an underlying race based motive in the actions of others towards the group baited, where none in fact exists.

    More evidence that my political foes are sub-par in the intellect department.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    WCG,

    Based on recent developements she may be amongst the 98 smartest Senators, or at least tied for last…

  • Flickertail

    I just wonder how many Rep Senators used to be a KKK grand wizard compared with the Dem’s? At least the Republicans had enough common sence to not elect Duke.

  • Eneils Bailey

    Hey Boy!

    Call me Senator Boxer.

  • Bat One

    my political foes are sub-par in the intellect department.

    A weapons grade bit of self-congratulatory delusion! If your performance here at SAB is any sort of indication, your “intellect department” has earned its reputation for abysmal underachievement. If that “department” worked for me, I’d fire all of ‘em.

  • Flickertail

    Sorry Senator Bird was only an “Exalted Cyclops” my bad.

  • Flickertail

    Gees Byrd I meant.

  • jimmypop

    im telling you, like algores pappy, these liberals want their slaves back.

  • Wing Chun Geologist

    Barbara Boxer is the queen of condescension.

    When you call Senator Feinstein’s office expressing an opposite her own, her staff treats you professionally and respectfully.

    If you call Boxer’s office to express a view opposing the her opinions, you’re treated rudely.

    That’s if you can get through. Boxer turns off her phone system when she might get negative feedback from the public.

  • pparets

    Hannitized surely knows that Barbara Boxer is a notorius race panderer who inevitably tries to shut off every unpleasant conversation with some reference to black preferences – as though one must never challenge them.

    And like Boxer, Hannitized frequently manages to find some racist motivation – even where none exists – because it allows him to choke off further discussion. That’s exactly what he is doing on this thread!

    Naturally he also inserts the implication that he too has been the victim of racism…

    More race baiting from Rob, and more cries of racism from sensitive Republicans who don’t know what real racism looks, or feels like.

  • Bat One

    Wing Chun

    Di-Fi can afford to be magnanimous. She and her husband have already bilked the US taxpayers of hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Barbara Boxer, on the other hand, is simply and arrogant dolt.

  • badlands4

    Sigh…and here we go again, back to 7th grade behavior…..COME ON GUYS! Seriously, are we all adults? Can we not have a conversation, disagreeing, even vociferously disagreeing, w/o acting like children?

    I don’t mean to preach, but it seems every thread ends up this way no matter the topic.

    As for this clip, she was indeed condescending and obnoxious, but that has nothing to do with her politics, it has to do with her personality. I have watched her enough times to see that she seems to have a serious power trip complex, again, having nothing to do with her party affiliation. There are plenty of these types of people on each side of the aisle. I think this gentleman had every right to feel offended, and I am GLAD to see more regular citizens starting to stand up to Congress during these dog and pony shows. Most of this is the ability for these members of Congress to just talk and give speeches, not questions, and they are bullies.

  • Wing Chun Geologist

    Typo above

    As a teacher I’ve run across dozens and dozens of BARBARA BOXERS over my career.

  • Wing Chun Geologist

    As a teacher I’ve run across dozens and dozens of over my career.

    The tone of voice that Boxer uses is the same as the condescending tone used by the education “professor” when a grad student questions the validity of the “research” supporting some assassinine educational practice.

    The tone of voice that Boxer uses is the same as the condescending tone that a principal gives when they refuse to suspend a student who deliberately vandalized school property or swore at a teacher.

    The tone of voice that Boxer uses is the same as the condescending tone used by the district administrator who’s telling a retired doctor who decides to teach HS biology that they won’t accept his MD as equivelent to an MA in education when it comes to pay scale.

    Education is full of smarmy Barbara Boxers who know what’s best for everyone else, and have to talk down to anyone stupid enough to dissagree with them.

  • Lioncourt

    Still no coments on Senator Sessions racist remarks during the confirmation hearings.

  • Wing Chun Geologist

    Di-Fi can afford to be magnanimous. She and her husband have already bilked the US taxpayers of hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Barbara Boxer, on the other hand, is simply and arrogant dolt.

    Babs will never be accused of being one of the 99 smartest senators.

  • Steve Cates

    The real crazy part about this is that there is no way on earth that any white guy would ever get away with challenging Senator Boxer regardless of the reason.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I’ll bet she misses Biden being around so they can have a conversation they can both understand.

  • Hannitized

    Condescending, perhaps. Racist? Not a chance!

    Why yes, eunuchized, we do know your (SIC) a practicing race baiter and apologist for racists.

    Ad hominems are really not insulting to me. You should find another form of entertainment.

  • Hannitized

    PP,

    You really missed the mark on this one. Rob is the only person who used the word racist, or labeled anyone a racist, not me.

    I merely claimed he used the word racist, in order to succeed in his race baiting.

    You attempt to attack me for noticing his win at any cost strategy. One you claim to condemn.

    You need to start looking in the mirror friend.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    We can all thank California for electing two of the biggest idiots to the US Senate. Also, we can thank California for giving us princess Pelosi. I am so sick and tired of the liberal morons ruining this country.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    goon, you seem to be sick and tired a lot.

    Have you considered supplements?

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Goon,

    Nancy Pelosi is a native of Maryland. Educated (poorly) at Georgetown University.

  • Buzz

    As usual, the black guy (or woman) gets loud, uppity, “offended”, and the white person is suppose to back down. Fuck that, good for Boxer for standing her ground.

  • Buzz

    Yea, she was making a point, what the fuck difference does him allegedly being offended have to do with what she is saying? Is she suppose to quit talking because he is getting loud? Fuck that, I see that shit all the time.

    If there is one of them they get loud, if there is 10 of them you get your skull kicked in.

  • Wayne

    That whore, Senator Boxer, is a racist, most politicians are; they put people into groups. Why do they do this? So they can erode the rights of the individual. They race bait all the time to gain power and control. They position group against group, race against race, all as a cover up to take away the rights of the most important minority of all, the individual. It is all a smoke screen. It is so very cunning and evil.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    As with Boxer so with blackwaterboob: If buzzardbreath is defending them you can rely on them being a racist.

  • e4bannan

    Why didn’t Brig. Gen. Walsh bark at her like this when she got her nose out of joint over being called ma’am? This guy stomped on her without fear. I don’t know anything about him, but he can’t be all bad.

  • pparets

    Hannitized…

    Rob is the only person who used the word racist, or labeled anyone a racist, not me

    Nowhere in his post did Rob label anyone a racist.

    He used the word as sarcastic hyperbole in referencing republicans.

    No attack intended. :)

  • Bat One

    Nowhere in his post did Rob label anyone a racist.

    He used the word as sarcastic hyperbole in referencing republicans.

    pparets,

    Be prepared to explain sarcasm to Hannitized if he shows up on this thread again.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Hannis calling someone a liar? Uh Oh!

    And notice how Rob didn’t have the courage to put in writing that Alford belongs to the National Black Chamber of Commerce, because it detracts from his criticism of being put in a category where skin color is mentioned.

    Except it is in the original post.

    Barbara Boxer wound up getting reamed by Harry Alford, the chair of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, after attempting to challenge his testimony on energy policy. When

    Massive lies are fun, huh H?

  • Hannitized

    Nowhere in his post did Rob label anyone a racist.

    He used the word as sarcastic hyperbole in referencing republicans.

    No attack intended.

    First of all, you need to look up the word hyperbole before you use it in a sentence. Second, you need to be honest with yourself, because you certainly aren’t being honest with me.

    Nowhere did I deny Rob was using sarcasm, but he was using sarcasm to label Boxer a racist. You can pretend he was joking, but we all know the score.

    This is not at all like Rbb’s use of racial terms for the sake of hyperbole. Rob was being an angry fat ass fuck (hyperbole), attacking boxer for using data that identified a diverse opinions against a group that was labeled “National Black Chamber of Commerce” (never heard of such a thing).

    I mean, if this phony doesn’t like racial things, he shouldn’t belong to a racial group. It makes no sense.

  • Hannitized

    Here is the National Black Chamber of Commerce’s Mission Statement:

    Mission Statement

    To economically empower and sustain African American communities through entrepreneurship and capitalistic activity within the United States and via interaction with the Black Diaspora.

    Yeah, this guy doesn’t like it when people are being “racial”. Sure!

    Go to their website, all the pictures on their website are of all black people, including Barack Obama.

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    Hannitized,

    The fact that he represents a racial community does not give everyone carte blanche to be racially idiotic toward him.

    He had a problem with the fact that just because he was representing the black community, Boxer thought that it was somehow legitimate to use the endorsement of another black community against the race-neutral studies he was giving her. She basically said, “You’re black, so you should care more about what other black people say rather than what science says.”

    If you don’t see how that is wrong, you are a complete moron.

  • Hannitized

    Hairy,

    Look brother, the CRA report was presented by the NBCC. The material in the report suggests that the people who will be most affected by the policy will be those with “average jobs” and the job losses and opportunity that will occur will be the “silent” losses of job in the low wage income segments of the US that are already affected (losing jobs and opportunity) for other reasons.

    They targeted areas of the US that are populated heavily by blacks in America. It appears that CRA gave the report to NBCC to deliver the message that the poor blacks will suffer most form this policy.

    Read the report yourself. Do the research yourself.

    Figure 3.4 illustrates the employment impacts if only half of the decline in the market-clearing
    wage rate is absorbed by workers immediately. In this case, the other half of the reduction in
    payments to labor has to be achieved by eliminating job positions. The actual number of job
    positions that would have to be shed depends on whether higher-paying or lower-paying jobs
    are the ones that are eliminated.http://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/documents/CRA_Waxman-Markey_ 5-20-09_v8.pdf In our calculation in the figure, we assume that jobs would
    be shed in equal proportions across the entire wage distribution, and report the loss in
    “average jobs.”[/url] (The precise number of jobs would be lower if ACESA would
    disproportionately affect the relatively higher-paid positions, and it would be higher if ACESA
    would cause a disproportionate loss of lower-paid types of jobs.) Figure 3.4 shows that in
    2015, the number of people on the unemployment rolls is estimated to be approximately 2.3
    million higher than in the baseline. It also shows that there would remain between about 2.5
    to 3 million fewer average jobs in the economy far into the future relative to what would
    otherwise have been possible but for the requirements of ACESA.
    Because these estimated employment impacts are based on the general equilibrium
    requirement that total payments to labor must fall to the new, lower level that can be
    supported by the reduced overall productivity of the entire economy, they are necessarily
    inclusive of all increases in so-called “green jobs” that will be created as a result of the
    proposed legislation.9

    Source: CRA Model Results, 2009
    Employment impacts will also vary by industrial sector. Figure 3.6 shows the job loss in 2030
    by sector. About 65% of the job losses that would accompany ACESA are projected to be in
    employment opportunities in the services and commercial sectors.     Service sector
    employment reductions reflect the cumulative impact of businesses having to pay more for
    their energy services, and facing higher costs for goods and services generally, almost all of
    which are made using more expensive energy. These will tend to be “silent” losses of
    opportunity in the relatively low-wage portions of the economy that are least often associated
    with either the emitting sectors who will face the direct cost of the policy or the activities
    where the most overt examples of new “green jobs” will be found.     Energy-intensive industries
    will also be affected as their competitiveness relative to other producers’ declines due to the
    increases in energy costs. Conventional fuels decline because of reduced demand for fuels
    in general and the substitution to various forms of biofuels. The electricity sector gains as a
    result of the need to replace existing generation plants with zero and low carbon emitting
    technologies, and also due to general equilibrium effects.

    If you are going to give your report to a racial organization to present material that targets low income areas of the US highly populated by blacks, it is not unreasonable to expect people to have other racial organizations offering a counter opinion.

    If you don’t like it, tell CRA to have a non racial organization to not make that pitch.

    If you don’t understand, you are a complete moron. How does that sound?

  • Hannitized

    Alford was visibly upset that his organization that he believes represents blacks and their concerns over job loss and opportunity. He does not like that the NAACP offers a countering opinion to his black organization.

    What he is really mad about is that Boxer was representing another black organization.

    “Im the Black National Chamber of Commerce and your trying to put another black group to pitting another black organization on me”, “it is condescending to me”. “I don’t like it, it’s racial”. “Your speaking on behalf of the black community?”.

    It wasn’t that he was upset that she was bringing racial statements to an issue where race doesn’t matter, he was mad that his racial organization was being challenged.

    He didn’t like having to be “contending” with another black group.

    The guy was playing the race card to silence Boxer. Shameful.

  • Bat One

    If you don’t like it, tell CRA to have a non racial organization to not make that pitch.

    So, an organization NOT representing the individuals most effected by the policy evaluated in the report should be the one introducing that report? And those most drastically effected would presumably be barred from having their views on the policy considered?

    That’s kinda like having Fred Phelps introduce a report on the “emotional damage” imposed on gays by disallowing homosexual marriage.

    I LOVE it!!! It is always wildly amusing to watch one liberal twist and spin, flop and wriggle, trying to defend another witless liberal from the inanity of liberal identity politics and the hypocrisy of being unable to live up to the same sensitivity standards you try to impose on the rest of us.

    Thanks for the chuckle!

  • Hannitized

    So, an organization NOT representing the individuals most effected by the policy evaluated in the report should be the one introducing that report?

    That is not what I am saying at all. What I am saying is that he is pretending that his racial organization is the only one that matters. And if people don’t like this issue being about organizations who are speaking on behalf of those affected, then they should not be choosing organizations who speak on behalf of those affected.

    Put simply, this guy is playing a big charade and nobody is buying it except those who want to be dishonest.

  • robert108

    Bat: Of course, little H is desperately trying to draw attention away from Boxer’s obvious racism with his usual straw man nonsense. It’s what he does, along with making bad analogies.

  • Bat One

    R108,

    I don’t much give a rat’s ass about accusations of racism… anyone’s accusations. That tactic, the accusation, is like the parable of the little boy who cried “Wolf!” (I almost said “fairy tale” but I didn’t want to offend somebody else’s sensitivities!)

    Racist or not, Boxer is most certainly a bigot, a dolt, and hugely arrogant with nothing but her title to back up that arrogance. She is a pluperfect example of why this country needs to initiate legislative term limits.

  • robert108

    I don’t much give a rat’s ass about accusations of racism… anyone’s accusations.

    I only care when it’s someone in a position of power, who can affect the lives of all Americans, and who is speaking in the course of performing her duties. She is paid by all Americans, not just the ones who agree with the Dem “plantation” mentality of the Dem Party. I am also concerned with the self-righteous hypocrisy of the Dems who, while courting minorities by obvious pandering, exhibits racial bigotry at the same time.
    I do agree that a private citizen using racial terms in private conversation is not a “racist”, and have said so many times.
    Boxer’s racial condescension in this hearing, is IMO a far different matter, and should be criticized by all real Americans.

  • Bat One

    Boxer’s racial condescension in this hearing, is IMO a far different matter, and should be criticized by all real Americans.

    Absolutely! ‘Course dat boy Alford git his black ass back on da plantation where he belong, none dis nebba happen!

  • robert108

    ‘Course dat boy Alford git his black ass back on da plantation where he belong, none dis nebba happen!

    Obviously what Boxer and the Dem culture of corruption wants!

  • Bat One

    My point exactly!

  • robert108

    (fist bump)

  • Hannitized

    Barbara Boxer has every right to present data from organizations from the communities affected that have a differing opinion, without being labeled a racist for having done so.

  • Hannitized

    he is insisting that the old guard, plantation mentality organizations so near and dear to the hearts of liberal Democrats are no longer the only ones that matter. And Alford is correct in his assessment. 100 Black Men, for example, is far more pertinent and effective than either the NAACP or the SCLC.

    He is insisting NO SUCH THING. It is your imagination that attributes wisdom or meaning to his words. And his choice of words say NO SUCH THING.

    He is simply upset that HE is the National Black Chamber of Commerce and that how dare Boxer make him contend with another Black organization.

    That it! Then, when he realize that wasn’t going to fly, he tried to make it about race, and pretend that Boxer was being racial. Well…..if presenting material from those from the business community is being racial, then, of course she is being racial, he is being racial too.

    So again, Boxer had every right to present the data she did.

    Perhaps she was being condescending, but so what. He was being hostile well before that.

  • Hannitized

    He is simply upset that HE is the National Black Chamber of Commerce and that how dare Boxer make him contend with another Black organization.

    That’s it! Then, when he realized that his retort wasn’t going to silence Boxer effectively, he tried to make it about race, and pretend that Boxer was being racial, in order to silence her. Well…..if presenting material from those from the business community is being racial, then, of course she is being racial, he is being racial too.

    So again, Boxer had every right to present the data she did.

    Perhaps she was being condescending, but so what. He was being hostile well before that.

    Isn’t it funny, how you guys approve of a black man using race to silence a white person when the black person is on your side.

    Heh’ and they call leftists racist.

  • pparets

    From Hannitized…

    The guy was playing the race card to silence Boxer. Shameful.

    Wrong!

    Boxer introduced the material.

    Her intent was to silence him!

    Instead he fired right back.

    Senator Boxer went into her huff-and-puff mode.

    After all, democrats have no use for ‘uppity neegroos’, i.e., conservative ones. [Justice Clarence Thomas comes to mind.]

    YOU have frequently castigated white bloggers on SAB for daring to speak about blacks or racism.

    In fact, you did it again on this very thread!

    More race baiting from Rob, and more cries of racism from sensitive Republicans who don’t know what real racism looks, or feels like.

    … implying, of course, that you do!

    But, it’s OK with you for white Senator Boxer to comment on what blacks want or think. Why? Because she feels their pain?

    Which of those two, Hannitized, is better qualified to speak to the black experience and racism? Boxer or Alford?

  • Bat One

    That is not what I am saying at all.

    That is exactly what you’ve been saying.

    If that’s not what you intended to say, then the problem lies with your inability to think and articulate clearly.

    What I am saying is that he is pretending that his racial organization is the only one that matters.

    And once again, you are mistaken, probably because, as usual, you are pointed in the wrong direction. Its not that Mr. Alford thinks that his is the only black organization that matters, but that he is insisting that the old guard, plantation mentality organizations so near and dear to the hearts of liberal Democrats are no longer the only ones that matter. And Alford is correct in his assessment. 100 Black Men, for example, is far more pertinent and effective than either the NAACP or the SCLC.

    And if people don’t like this issue being about organizations who are speaking on behalf of those affected, then they should not be choosing organizations who speak on behalf of those affected.

    A ringing endorsement of my assessment above of your inability to think and articulate clearly. Slow down, kid. You’re making your own head spin, and its harder for the rest of us to take what you say seriously when we’re laughing.

  • Hannitized

    YOU have frequently castigated white bloggers on SAB for daring to speak about blacks or racism.

    I have castigated white bloggers for calling blacks racists, yes. Because more often than not, they screw up what real racism is, just as Rob Port has done on this blog.

    Again, Barbara Boxer has every right to present data from organizations from the communities affected that have a differing opinion, without being labeled a racist for having done so.

    Alford is simply upset that HE is the National Black Chamber of Commerce and that how dare Boxer make him contend with another Black organization.

    That’s it! Then, when he realized that his retort wasn’t going to silence Boxer effectively, he tried to make it about race, and pretend that Boxer was being racial, in order to silence her. Well…..if presenting material from those from the business community is being racial, then, of course she is being racial, he is being racial too.

    So again, Boxer had every right to present the data she did.

    Perhaps she was being condescending, but so what. He was being hostile well before that.

    Isn’t it funny, how you guys approve of a black man using race to silence a white person when the black person is on your side.

    Which of those two, Hannitized, is better qualified to speak to the black experience and racism? Boxer or Alford?

    Neither of them are talking about racism or the black experience, so it is irrelevant.

    Both the NAACP and the NBCC are equal in representing american blacks interest.

  • Hannitized

    Alford was playing the racial card to silence Boxer, shameful!

    Alford was visibly upset that his organization that he believes represents blacks and their concerns over job loss and opportunity. He does not like that the NAACP offers a countering opinion to his black organization.

    What he is really mad about is that Boxer was representing another black organization.

    “Im the Black National Chamber of Commerce and your trying to put another black group to pitting another black organization on me”, “it is condescending to me”. “I don’t like it, it’s racial”. “Your speaking on behalf of the black community?”.

    It wasn’t that he was upset that she was bringing racial statements to an issue where race doesn’t matter, he was mad that his racial organization was being challenged.

    He didn’t like having to be “contending” with another black group.

    The guy was playing the race card to silence Boxer, pure and simple.

  • pparets

    that’s just plain BS, Hannitized, and you know it.

  • Hannitized

    Thanks PP, but i put a considerable amount of research and logic behind my well though out argument. I would prefer you do the same.

    Your argument is that Barbera Boxer is arguing “black preferences”, what ever that means and that she has no need for “uppity Negroes”. SAD.

    Further, your argument is that I am a bad guy or something.

    WEAK. WEAK. WEAK.

  • pparets

    Hannitized… not ONE WORD of what you just said is accurate!

  • badlands4

    I don’t know if I agree with Hanitized(Mr., Miss, Mrs? It seems rude to just call you that, but…shrug), but I do agree that whether I agree or not with his premise on whether she was just condescending or insulting him racially, he does put thought into what he says, just like many of you do, just my opinion however.

    I tend to think she was being not just condescending, but insulting, but in the end, only *he* can say how he truly felt. I tend to believe him, but then to be fair, she irritates me on many levels, so I could be reading into his side because of how insulted she can make me feel.

  • Hannitized

    For evidence, here are more examples of Boxer being confrontational, and perhaps condescending? You decide.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FdFf7_yUVc

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4iHan7BjqY

  • Hannitized

    Badlands4,

    I don’t deny her tone is condescending, but then again, some people deal with confrontation differently. His tone was very hostile towards her when she brought up his location of residency.

    I just don’t think Boxer was being racist. I think she was offering a counter argument to suggest that the National Black Chamber of Commerce doesn’t speak for the entire black community in the urban areas that will be affected, and that is about it.

    To me, it’s very simple. But I know how sensitive these issues can be. Someone got irritated.

  • WOOFX

    Harry Alford, President and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce which took $275,000 from EXXoN .

    Alford saying hew was speaking for the “black community is Black Comedy Gold.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    For Hannah to claim he is of superior intellect is about the saddest thing I’ve read today. I didn’t break a sweat turning him into a quivering pile of neurotic jello.

    Hannah is what is known as an Accidental Troll. He’s the sort who is stuck thinking in the netherworld between the dispassionate emotional and passionate intellectual stages and makes many wrong turns in his logic, mixes up the logical rules of each (emotional and intellectual logic are much different), and then mistakes epiphanies for meaning he is correct when he’s only seeing something he did not before which fools him into thinking he’s won an argument.

    He is not fully part of the argument back and forth because much of what is said to him doesn’t connect and he’s too busy thinking based on what he already came up with instead of what has been added to the knowledge of the situation.

    Hannah, Boxer has no right to infer much less tell any black man what is an authentic black point of view. First, there is no such thing as an authentic black point of view as blacks are as individual as whites, snowflakes, and sand grains. Second, she is not and never has been black. Third, she clearly has no cognizance of reality on the ground and instead is suffused with sociopolitical theory of the left which is not a sufficient ground for making statements such as she tends to make.

    I have a black ex-girlfriend who’d smack you and Buzz down with a smile on her face. Black Americans know very well how much they’ve been lied to by white liberals. Obama is the first black prez and when a black man took the highest office in the land, their lives didn’t magically become ponies and ice cream. The reality is hitting home. If you libtards had half a brain you’d slink away now before the shit hits the fan.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development