Workforce Safety & Insurance’s Chief Apologist?

Word is from some visitors to my booth down here at the NDGOP state convention is that certain reporters in the North Dakota media are calling me “WSI’s chief apologist.”
Given that I’d just as soon privatize worker’s compensation insurance in North Dakota by making it like car insurance (required to carry it, provided by private companies), I hardly think I’m an “apologist” for the agency at all. I’m just interested in truth and fairness, and I don’t think the North Dakota public is getting that from the state media on the WSI issue.
The state media has held WSI “whistleblower” (and current Democrat legislative candidate) Jim long up as a wrongfully-terminated martyr, but the truth is that Long’s employment WSI was ended for a variety of very good reasons including a possible affair with a subordinate. I think that side of the story should be told to the public, but the state media (by their lack of coverage) apparently doesn’t.
When Jasper Schneider, the Democrat insurance commissioner candidate, has his uncle in all the state papers attacking WSI (Jasper and his party’s #1 issue) I think the relationship between Jasper and his uncle should be noted in the articles so the public can consider the source. The state media, by their routine refusal to make such connections, doesn’t think so.
When someone like KVRR (Fargo Fox affiliate) news director Jim Shaw produces a news story so transparently biased and one-sided that even casual observers of the WSI issue are left scratching their heads I think the media owes the public a rebuttal. But none is, nor will it ever be, forthcoming.
If pointing out the facts that the media won’t makes me an apologist, then I guess I don’t mind the title.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Joseph – I never claimed to be fair.

    Thanks for telling us that we don’t have to take you seriously.

    You may not realize it, but you just played your hand, Joseph.

  • Joseph

    so perhaps you’re not all that fair either.

    I never claimed to be fair. Life’s not fair, ask Charlie. But I have a few of what I’ll call facts and my prognostification has been pretty good. This is from December 1, 2007. http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/steve_cates_putting_his_money_where_his_mouth_is_joel_heitkamp_scurries_fro/ Anyone remember what happened on December 6?

    But really, none of that matters. The articles he wrote in May don’t matter. All the blustering doesn’t matter. Joel doesn’t matter, I don’t matter, Blunt’s scheming doesnt matter. All of it is history. Future events promise to make all the crap as irrelevant as Miss World’s toe fungus.

    And yes, Kelly would make an excellent sacrificial lamb.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Is that anything like line dancing or more like the traditional square dancing?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    The detractors of WSI are mainly relying on unverified information.

    The facts are the bureau has denied some claims to people. The bureau has to be able to prove this in a court of law.

    The detractors are repeating these maybe frauds without demanding a release from these people.

    The bureau has come out of two audits with passing (but not perfect) grades. I suspect the politically inspired anti WSI JIhad by the Democrats is keeping them from improving as much as they like.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    We should also be demanding censure for those behind the political prosecution of Sandy Blunt. That’s far worse of a crime than what Blunt was accused of (and swiftly cleared once it went to court.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Thanks Joseph. The avatar is just a screenshot from a vid of me doin’ a little bit of liquid waving some years back.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Joseph – At least my hand is not all blurry.

    Well, blurry blur, blur to that!

  • Joseph

    Apologist: A person who argues in defense or justification of something, such as a doctrine, policy, or institution.

    I think certain reports are being kind by calling you an apologist. I think you either take everything SCates and Armstrong create and give you as Gospel – which, is the central content of Christian revelation – not a good idea. Or you know about the lies and gossip and run with it anyway. Either way that goes way beyond being an apologist.

    Your one sided “reporting” makes you no different than your opinion of Jim Shaw.

    Hurry up, maybe you can get your name in for Superintendent of Public Instruction.

  • Joseph

    You may not realize it, but you just played your hand, Joseph.

    At least my hand is not all blurry.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Well if you’re going to be a WSI apologist, then you may as well be the best.

  • Joseph

    For the record Likwidshoe, I lover your avatar. One of the coolest I’ve seen. I don’t understand it, but it looks cool.

    Kind of disappointed in Rob’s.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    For the record the dark side pressed fake charges against the director of WSI. These charges were thrown out of court.

    The chief accusers of WSI were insiders that tried to get protection. The protection was denied and they were fired with cause.

    Every verifiable investigation has show WSI to be in the right.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I never claimed to be fair. Life’s not fair, ask Charlie. But I have a few of what I’ll call facts and my prognostification has been pretty good.

    Life’s not fair. Good bluster, Joe, but you’re clearly not really interested in the truth here so much as a political agenda.

    Because if you were interested in the truth you’d be applauding the criticism of Shaw and the exposure of Long.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    At least my hand is not all blurry.

    Outside of snide comments about anyone who disagrees with you on WSI, what exactly have you offered to the debate?

    Nothing much, as far as I can tell.

    There was nothing fuzzy about those documents I posted about Long, and there was nothing fuzzy about Shaw’s bias in his reporting.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Your one sided “reporting” makes you no different than your opinion of Jim Shaw.

    Hey, I give the other side, and its pretty clear from your comments in the past that you’re personally involved with WSI, so perhaps you’re not all that fair either.

    But hey, maybe instead of casting aspersions, you should try and point out where I’m actually wrong about Long, Shaw or anything else.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development