Let’s hope we never have to find that out. That would only be the beginning of the damage, btw.

Those on the left tell us that they are not deranged, but I don’t recall any of the usual leftist suspects here, or elsewhere, condemning the remarks of Moore, or in any way distancing themselves from obscene notion of murdering a sitting President.

Don Myers? Puzzlefeet? WOOF and the rest? Not a peep of criticism for the demented Moore from any of them. What a surprise!

Personally, I think that Western Civilization is strong enough that it won’t collapse even if the Democrats are elected and pull out of Iraq.

I agree Adam. And not all the ‘critiques’ from the Democrats are unfair or unhelpful. But all in all, showing a disunited face to the enemy is always a bad idea.

But all in all, showing a disunited face to the enemy is always a bad idea.

An unprincipled president might be able to use that to his advantage, you think?

An unprincipled president might be able to use that to his advantage, you think?

Good thing we don’t have one of those right now.

In a fiendishly obscene essay, Professor Shahid Alam of Northeastern University portrays the mass-murdering thugs of 9/11 as heroes on the order of the American patriots of Lexington and Concord.

Michael Moore then picks up on this theme:

“The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not “insurgents” or “terrorists” or “The Enemy.” They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow — and they will win….I oppose the U.N. or anyone else risking the lives of their citizens to extract us from our debacle…the majority of Americans supported this war once it began and, sadly, that majority must now sacrifice their children until enough blood has been let that maybe — just maybe — God and the Iraqi people will forgive us in the end.”

the majority of Americans supported this war once it began and, sadly, that majority must now sacrifice their children until enough blood has been let that maybe — just maybe — God and the Iraqi people will forgive us in the end.”

Is this an anti-war statement?
Look how INTOLERATE MM really is.
When terrorists attack we must show restraint and understand their hate for us. When we defend our liberty we “must now sacrifice their (American) children”.

Does this guy have a soul?
According to his statement he believes in a God who might forgive America if we just die enough and bleed enough. He sounds like an Islamic terrorist.

An unprincipled president might be able to use that to his advantage, you think?

And why would it take an unprincipled president to do so? What is unprinicpled about pointing out that one’s opponents regard partisan advantage as more important than national security?

I would think a principled president would be obliged to point out why he believes that nation’s security is more important than do his opponents.