With Liberals In Control Of Congress, Gun Control Is Suddenly On The Agenda Again

Here we go…

In a new bill introduced the first day of present session of Congress, and with zero coverage from the MSM, H.R. 45 (Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009) targets all gun owners in the U.S.A.
This nefarious bill seeks to strip us all of our Constitutional Rights to possess and bear firearms of any distinction. It requires, within the first two years, that all new guns be registered. The bill goes retroactive after two years. Meaning that two years after the passage of the bill, ALL FIREARMS in a citizen’s possession must be registered, not just those purchased after the bill passes, and this apparently applies to antique firearms as well.
Every five years the firearm owner must go through a complete renewal process for each weapon owned. Failure to comply carries stiff penalties including confiscation of the firearms and jail time (penalties as high as ten years imprisonment in some cases). The bill also authorizes government searches without warrant, the creation of a federal bureaucracy to monitor firearm possession, etc.

Here’s a summary of the bill from Congres’ Thomas bill tracker:

1/6/2009–Introduced. Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 – Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license under this Act or a state system certified under this Act and such license has not been invalidated or revoked. Prescribes license application, issuance, and renewal requirements.
Prohibits transferring or receiving a qualifying firearm unless the recipient presents a valid firearms license, the license is verified, and the dealer records a tracking authorization number. Prescribes firearms transfer reporting and record keeping requirements. Directs the Attorney General to establish and maintain a federal record of sale system.
Prohibits: (1) transferring a firearm to any person other than a licensee, unless the transfer is processed through a licensed dealer in accordance with national instant criminal background check system requirements, with exceptions; (2) licensed manufacturer or dealer from failing to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements of this Act;
(3) failing to report the loss or theft of the firearm to the Attorney General within 72 hours; (4) failing to report to the Attorney General an address change within 60 days; (5)
keeping a loaded firearm, or an unloaded firearm and ammunition for the firearm, knowingly or recklessly disregarding the risk that a child is capable of gaining access, if a child uses the firearm and causes death or serious bodily injury.
Prescribes criminal penalties for violations of firearms provisions covered by this Act. Directs the Attorney General to: (1) establish and maintain a firearm injury information clearinghouse; (2) conduct continuing studies and investigations of firearm-related deaths and injuries; and (3) collect and maintain current production and sales figures of each licensed manufacturer. Authorizes the Attorney General to certify state firearm licensing or record of sale systems.

What’s troubling about this, beyond the idea of having to register our guns with the government (the intent of the 2nd amendment was to provide us with a last-ditch defense against a tyrannical government, so what good is it if the government has a list of where all the guns are?), is that the clear intent here is to make buying, possessing and selling a firearm so difficult – so wrought with red tape backed up by severe penalties – that most gun owners just give up owning the gun because of the sheer hassle of it.
The liberals have learned their lessons well from the failed alcohol prohibition of the last century, and the very successful anti-smoking nanny statism. They know that they’ll never pass an outright ban of firearms. Such a ban would fail like prohibition did. But they know they can whittle away at our ability to own guns, one regulation and prohibition at a time, just as they’ve done and are doing with smoking.
They know that they don’t need to ban things like smoking or guns that they don’t like. They just need to make them so horrendously regulated that nobody wants to do them anyway.
Why anyone would think such tactics have a place in a free society is beyond me.

Tags: , , , , ,


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    In a democracy, two wolves and a sheep get to vote what’s for dinner.

    In a Republic though, the sheep has an Uzi.

  • SigFan

    Sorry for the length of this – I tried to trim out as much as I could without removing the salient parts.

    Gun Law Update by Alan Korwin,
    Author Gun Laws of America Jan. 5, 2008

    Gun-ban list proposed

    Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress).
    It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady’s plan to introduce shortly. ” ( http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1022 )

    I have an outline of the Brady’s current plans and targets of opportunity, It’s horrific. They’re going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They’ve made little mention of criminals.

    Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states’ rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment.

    The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):

    Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
    M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR; Olympic Arms PCR; AR70, Calico Liberty, Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU, Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, or FNC, Hi-Point Carbine, HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, HK-PSG-1, Thompson 1927 Commando, Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; Saiga, SAR-8, SAR-4800, SKS with detachable magazine, SLG 95, SLR
    95 or 96, Steyr AUG, Tavor, Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz).

    Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
    Calico M-110, MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3, Olympic Arms OA, TEC-9, TEC-DC9,
    TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10, Uzi.

    Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
    Armscor 30 BG, SPAS 12 or LAW 12, Striker 12, Streetsweeper.

    Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
    A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below), (iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.

    Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rimfire rifles).

    A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has (i) a second pistol grip, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a barrel shroud or (iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and (v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

    A semiautomatic shotgun with (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a pistol grip (see definition below), (iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and (iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

    Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.

    Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will:

    Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any “semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.” Note that Obama’s pick for this office (Eric Holder, confirmation hearing set for Jan. 15) wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home.

    In making this determination, the bill says, “there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.”

    In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public.

    The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn’t have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose — is that devious or what? And of course, “sporting purpose” is a rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.

    Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America
    http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm

    The long and short of it is that after this, the only people who will have firearms are the government and criminals. I think a lot of law abiding people are about to become criminals.

  • HG

    I guess all those people buying up guns after Obama’s election weren’t so naive after all.

  • Bat One

    Its kin-genital!

  • imagine

    I shutter evry tyme I vsit this blug…
    yet i contnue to reed the drivble….
    I must be addycted to stoopidity

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    Get it???

  • FlyOnTheWall

    This is an easy one to fix.

    Don’t loose control of the Congress.

    Figure out why you lost control and make some changes.

    True. We need to figure out how to elect people that will uphold the constitution instead of the group that’s in there. Very good point.

  • SigFan

    See the quote in my signature – they are now going for the trifecta. Wake up America, only cattle are led to slaughter without a fight!

    Doc – I wouldn’t be at all surprised that the underground has already begun. Many friends foresaw this coming and have taken appropriate measures to ensure the government can’t confiscate ALL the weapons.

  • docdave

    I can’t fathom the military siding with idiocy

    I don’t think that Obama will use the military to enforce gun control or any other of his possible tyrannical measures. The backbone of the military is the national guard and I think the most of the states would be reluctant to release them for these unconstitutional acts. [see my post The Beginning Of An American Velvet Revolution?] I think the enforcement would be left to police thugs that would be willing to exert their force over the people.

  • DBdowner

    Imagine,

    All this banter about the 2nd ammendment. So stupid! I guess the people who made the most functional form of government the world has ever seen were just so much more stupid than you. They thought it was worth writing about…

    The only reason you read this blog is to fuel your brain dead idealism. Every negative needs its positive. If you would learn to think the others language game, you might not be so bewildered. But asking a liberal to experience anothers language game is blasphemy. This is how they know we can’t possibly comprehend their ideas and intentions.

    Experiencing a liberals language game (Wittgenstein) is really easy. It requires the mentality of a toddler and the brainless hopefulness of a disney fed teenager.

  • http://www.undsccc.com/ GregP

    Wrote my congressman and urged him to oppose this terrible piece of legislation.

    Typical for something of this caliber to come out of IL.

  • imagine

    This is an easy one to fix.

    Don’t loose control of the Congress.

    Figure out why you lost control and make some changes.

  • docdave

    One of the first steps of a totalitarian regime is to disarm the people. This is just the step that precedes gun confiscation. After all when all guns are registered it is quite easy to conficate them since you know where they are. If we the people submit to this tyranny, we can kiss all of our freedoms goodbye.

    Oh yes, work or concentration camps (gulags) follow closely behind gun confiscation. Obama is already proposing the camps. Time to arm and organize militia groups may just be around the corner.

  • JJ

    The Democrats seemed to learn how to start talking to the Republicans when they were trying to get the stimulus package approved. Hopefully that will continue with issues like this one.

    I saw that the Friends of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is asking people to give their opinion on the most important thing for Congress to do next. Then they are going to focus their efforts on getting Congress to accomplish what we actually want them to do.

    What do you think Congress should do? Should they work to oppose this legislation? Should they try to reform existing gun laws? Or should they focus their efforts on completely different areas? Make sure to add your opinion so Congress can know what we want them to do next – http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/email/email4.cfm?id=200

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom,
    — go from us in peace.

    We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.

    May your chains sit lightly upon you,
    and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!

    Samuel Adams

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    A nations people without guns are sneered at as subjects ….

    A nations people with guns are politely called citizens………..

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    OK. Communism is on the march. Making exercising our God given 2nd Amendment rights a crime. The Supreme Court would strike this down, but B. H. O. will try to pack the court and rule this “OK”.

    Men and Women of freedom. Rise up and oppose this Unconstitutional attempt to strip us of our means to defend ourselves.

    Just this week, three, four, two “certain peoples” murdered innocent women in their car, in their homes. CRACK HEADS — you know who they are.

    If the women had a gun, they would have had a fighting chance.

    I won’t say it.

  • SHADY

    Later on, I won’t be keeping my guns at my residence. That would be a stupid thing to do. You would think that the dem-lib-commi’s would’nt be so stupid as to walk a sleeping dog!!

    Kramer, my thoughts exactly!!

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    “Among the natural rights of the colonists are these:
    First a right to life,
    secondly to liberty,
    and thirdly to property;
    together with the right to defend them in the best manner they can”

    Samuel Adams

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    “The Constitution shall never be construed… to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”

    Samuel Adams

  • docdave

    Descarte once wrote that ‘if you want to be a real seeker of truth that at some point in your life you must question everything as much as possible’. Conservatives are capable of doing this, liberals with their closed minds are not.

  • Kramer

    …out of my cold, dead hands….

  • http://www.30yearminimum.com/ Alhefner

    The anti-gun, pro-government control, people pushing bills like this have one basic tactic…push the fear factor. IT is the only real weapon they have.

    It is the job of those of us who know that more firearms ownership and actually more liberal laws for firearms REDUCE crime rates.

    Those of us who know what the second amendment is for tend to sit quietly at home and not go out ad participate in these debates until it is far too late to have an effect. We must change our attitudes if we plan to keep firearm ownership legal in the United States. We must be vocal. We must campaign against any politician who supports gun control legislation. If we don’t we will end up losing ot just our firearms but our very liberty.

  • Brent

    …the clear intent here is to make buying, possessing and selling a firearm so difficult – so wrought with red tape backed up by severe penalties – that most gun owners just give up owning the gun because of the sheer hassle of it.

    Except for gangsters and what not. But this is good if you are a gun grabber… the higher proportion of “bad guys” with guns, the easier it will be to demonize and eventually outright ban firearms.

  • JRA

    Here we go, the anti gun democrats are going to strip us all of our constitutional right to keep and bear arms, which has been recently upheld by the DC vs. Heller decision.

    Everyone needs to write there representatives’ and let them know how you feel about “HR45 Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009″.

    This is an unconstitutional bill being pushed through congress and it must be defeated. Sooner or later the government and the criminals, if there is a distinction, will be the only ones with firearms.

    The Republicans and the pro gun Democrats need to filibuster this and any other gun control bill when it comes up on the floor.

    Now is the time to buy your ak’s, ar15′s, .50 cal. Rifles, and any other type of firearm the gun grabbers deem “evil”. They will soon be legislated out of existence, all in the name of crime prevention.

    BTW, Did I mention that I am a liberal democrat?

  • Bat One

    The long and short of it is that after this, the only people who will have firearms are the government and criminals. I think a lot of law abiding people are about to become criminals.

    Sig,

    Yep! I know of no one who owns any firearms who will willingly surrender them… no matter what.

  • NoJelly

    I can’t fathom the military siding with idiocy. Sure, a platoon’s worth or two who only signed on “for the college money” maybe, but I just can’t see the American military turning on their own.

    After Waco, yeah, federal police are capable of all sorts of atrocity…

    This “stimulus” bill is another component: Impoverish the people and make them dependant…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I shutter evry tyme I vsit this blug…
    yet i contnue to reed the drivble….
    I must be addycted to stoopidity

    I like to think it’s because when you’re right most of the time, and you’re clearly right, you get the most flak from your opponents.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    This is an easy one to fix.

    Don’t loose [sic] control of the Congress.

    I shudder at the fact that you’re a teacher.

    Figure out why you lost control and make some changes.

    That’s what we on the right are trying to do, but your suggestion that such actives should preclude our opposition to the ruling party’s agenda isn’t going to happen.

    Dissent is patriotism, remember liberals?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development