Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, July 23, 2007


Why The Latest Harry Potter Won’t Be A Best Seller…

...even as it sets sales records.

The book that will probably set a single day and one week sales record, the book hundreds of thousands will line up for at midnight won’t be the Number One book on The New York Times Bestseller list? That’s right because Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a children’s book and those books don’t count.

It happened in 2000. The Harry Potter books—a once in a lifetime publishing phenomenon—were dominating the bestseller lists, with three titles ensconced in the Top 15 at the same time. It just wasn’t fair, moaned publishers of more “serious” fiction. It kept more deserving titles off the list, titles that people would never hear about, said bookstore owners. And so in a rash, indefensible decision, the New York Times decided to banish children’s books solely to their own separate list.

Imagine if the people behind the Nielsen Top 10 TV show listings decided that reality shows were “taking away” valuable attention from dramas and sitcoms. Let reality shows get their own list and the official Top 10 only include “genuine” TV shows, like CSI and House and Grey’s Anatomy.

This reminds me of a run-in I had with a friend a while back.  This friend is extremely well-read and could probably quote from a list of books he’s read so far-ranging, and often obscure, that it’d embarrass some literature professors.  We were talking about our favorite authors, and I threw out that when I just wanted sit down and enjoy a good story I usually couldn’t go wrong with Stephen King.  This friend of mine was incredulous, wondering how in the world anyone could truly enjoy a work by someone with as much mass-market appeal as King.  He seemed to feel that King was an author for the low-brow masses.

But I stood up for King.  I am not was widely-read as my friend, but I’ve read my share of the greats - Salinger, Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Vonnegut, etc. - and found many of their works to be entertaining and profound, but I’ve also found that deeper meanings and sophisticated literary nuance aren’t always the most important elements of a story.  Sometimes a person just likes to let an author spin a good yarn, and that a given author’s “yarns” appeal to the masses is no black mark against him/her.

Mass appeal doesn’t mean a lack of artistic merit.  The Beatles, for instance, are among the most successful bands of all time.  I doubt many would say that they weren’t true artists.

Now, personally, I’m not a fan of the Harry Potter series.  I’m a fan of the fantasy genre in general, but most of Rowling’s plots seem a bit too…simplistic and (not to sound like my somewhat pretentious friend) unsophisticated.  But that’s just a personal opinion which runs contrary to the fact that Rowling’s books have captivated the masses.  People go nuts for them, and there’s no reason to deny them their rightful place on a list meant to rank the best selling books.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for thatedeguy

I prefer the Amazon bestseller list anyways.  It’s updated quite regularly (hourly?) and doesn’t deliniate between one genre and another.  HP’s been at the top of the list since a few hours after it became available for preorder.

thatedeguy on July 23, 2007 at 06:41 am

I am not going to say that, say, Hansen, is a great rock band.  But they have their appeal to people that obviously lack a refined taste…  =) {subtle dig}

Reality is that I enjoy filet mignon.  But I usually eat hamburger or cheaper cuts of meat.  I don’t drink wine.  I rarely go to museums.  I eat hot dogs, drink beer, and go to baseball and football games.  Now my elitist friends think that makes me lowbrow.  I am not as cultured as they are. 

I have three kids, so my reading collection consists of a lot of Thomas the Tank Enging and Dr. Seuss.  They read philosophy and poetry and don’t have time for authors that aren’t academically credentialled enough.  Yet they don’t know who Milton Friedman is and have not read any Adam Smith or Locke or Jefferson or the Federalist Papers.  They don’t read Grisham or Chrichton or Clancy.  I don’t have time for books with obscure meanings.  I want books that are engaging and quick moving and most of the contemporary fiction authors deliver that.  As well as most contemporary filmmakers.  I don’t watch IFC because most of their stuff, though “artistic”, lacks a plot that I can follow while my wife is using the coffee grinder or running the dishwasher or my kids are complaining about their brother hitting them with a bat.  When I start listening to pop music and enjoying Adam Sandler films, it will be a problem, but until then I can live without “culture”. 

But guess what, outside of not fitting in at dinner parties with university professors, I fit in with my coworkers who follow sports, have a beer, and golf on the weekends.  My friends try to watch and follow soccer so that they can communicate with their smarter European friends.  Apparently they don’t realize that Europeans take fucking lead pipes to soccer matches so it ain’t as highbrow as they think.

Justin B. on July 23, 2007 at 10:00 am

Kurt Vonnegut is one of literature’s “greats”? In the minds of the postmodern, the “chattering classes” of pseudointellectuals that infest the Left and the education system today, perhaps. But not in the true definition of great.

James Kuhn on July 23, 2007 at 11:05 am

It’s OK Rob, you can name me as the friend that lambasted you for actually reading King’s drivel…

 

 


wink

Sphagnum on July 23, 2007 at 05:16 pm
Avatar for TeacherDave

After a 4-year liberal arts college education and an English degree (a.k.a. “a B.A. in BS”), I find I hate Faulkner, distrust Salinger (“Franny and Zooey” is beauty, but “Catcher” sucks dogballs), and love Stephen King.

The thing about King (if you can get past the anti-mass-market snobbery) is that he really is a master craftsman when it comes to description and story.  His tales, while almost entirely fantasy-driven, still work within the context of their own defined parameters. 

And if you only know of King as Cujo and Carrie and Running Man (which was a fun little book turned into an abominable film), then you don’t know King. (In fact, don’t go by about 90% of the films; they can’t get him right.)  “The Stand,” “The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon,” and the epic Dark Tower series are all evidence of his ability to capture the reader’s imagination in a way that few writers can.  He may not be the most technically proficient, but if I’m choosing a new book to read, I’ll ALWAYS pick King first.  Because, really, he’s the most friggin FUN.

(By the way, Rob, have you read “Lisey’s Story” yet?  Just finished it yesterday and enjoyed it quite a bit—even if there were no clear Dark Tower connections.)

TeacherDave on July 24, 2007 at 09:08 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.