Why Are We Paying For This Crap? Labor Secretary Chastises Vandals Of Gay Pride Posters

Obama’s Secretary of Labor decided that she wanted to honor “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month” by hanging up some posters and pictures in the Labor Department building (at the taxpayer’s expense, no doubt). Apparently everyone working at the Labor Department was ok with that.

WASHINGTON – Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is denouncing vandals who defaced many of the gay pride posters installed at the agency’s Washington headquarters.
Solis, the first secretary in the department’s history to publicly recognize Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month, sent an agency-wide e-mail last Friday saying she would not tolerate anti-gay misconduct.
“It appears, however, that some members of the Labor Department team have a different view, as it has come to my attention that most of the posters have been continually defaced or removed,” Solis said. “On several occasions, even the poster frames have been torn completely off the elevator walls.”
The posters first went up at the agency’s headquarters on June 1. Solis said they will stay up until the end of the month and would be replaced immediately if they are removed or destroyed.

Vandalism is stupid, and I certainly don’t have any problem with people being gay or transgendered or whatever. “Live and let live” is my philosophy. I just don’t understand why the government needs to recognize things like “gay pride.”
Shouldn’t we want the government to be blind to things like gender, race, religion and sexual orientation? I’d much rather have a government that simply doesn’t care about those things than one that wants to pat me on the head because of who I may choose to have sex with.
Being gay isn’t something to be proud of. It isn’t something to be ashamed of. It is just something you are that doesn’t entitle you to any different treatment by the government or under the law than anyone else.
I think this speaks to a deep divide in this country on social issues. One that doesn’t even really break down along the traditional liberal vs. conservative lines. Some people want the government to define what constitutes a good, upright citizen. Those people endlessly fight one another over what the definition of a good citizen is. The gays vs. the anti-gays are a good example of this.
But then there are others who don’t want the government to define anything for them and simply want to be free to live their lives in the way they see fit.
I’m in that last group. I don’t want a “heterosexual pride month” to offset “gay pride month.” I don’t care to have a “white pride month” either. I mostly just want to be left alone.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Hannitized

    Rob,

    I just don’t understand why the government needs to recognize things like “gay pride.”

    It seems to me that it is pretty obvious Rob. The secretary of labor was making a statement.

    Apparently, in her view, it is helpful to those who have suffered under thousands of years of embarrassment or societal shame for being gay. I think it is very obvious that our current administration thinks it is much better for our society to embrace many of these people who are productive citizens and for the future generations who are affected by our societal views.

    Many of our friends on this site love to bash gays and talk about their perverted behavior. Has it ever occurred to any of you, that their perverse behavior has to do with the fact that they are made to feel that they are not equal and that constantly being told you are perverted is the problem?

    Many refuse to accept that and become functional members of society. Others, not so much. Maybe it has to do with how we impose our views onto them, forever perpetuating the stereotype and mental issues many of these people suffer from?

    It’s as plausible as any other idea.

    I think what she did was brave, and yes, offensive to some. But those people who are offended have had their way for thousands of years and I think our civilization is due for a advancement.

  • Socks

    Government has no place deciding whether or not it is alright to be gay or straight. It should have no public opinions.I have my own opinions on the gay issue, but I do not believe that we should force someone to be straight. It should be a matter of convincing, not forcing.

  • bill-tb

    I wonder if the KKK hung posters — Afterall the KKK used to be the Democrats terror wing before it fell out of favor. Probably lynched too many white political opponets.

    These changeling Democrats are something else.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    I want posters,
    and confetti,
    and cakes,
    and a parade,
    and and a pony…….

    THEN people will luv me…..

    I feel your snide disregard for my love of rainbows and lollipops! Your obvious hatred is palpable and only proves your group doesn’t deserve the govt sponsored honors that mine does.
    (Someone please open the money spigot while I grab a bucket.)

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Let her chastise every other poster “vandalized” by anyone from now on.

  • Mickey

    Is that a pride issue?

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    Many of our friends on this site love to bash gays and talk about their perverted behavior. Has it ever occurred to any of you, that their perverse behavior has to do with the fact that they are made to feel that they are not equal and that constantly being told you are perverted is the problem?

    I disagree Hanni. I don’t think it’s fair to address every minority as victims, especially in modern America. I’d wager that on a level of dislike, the majority of those opposed to gay marriage dislike the idea like they dislike the minority who smoke around their kids, or the Lebanese minority guy with the funny accent at the gas station.

    The levels of vitriol or support held here really aren’t an adequate cross section, in my opinion.

  • sayanything-2407

    Real pride comes with accomplishment, not entitlement.

    Eddie, this stuck out like a light in the darkness.

    This is EXACTLY true.

    Pride comes in having a sense of accomplishment, of doing things for yourself and NOT from expecting something to be given to you.

    Government should be seen as Nuetral in all things, but of course we all know this is not true. The idividuals that run the different sections of Government will let thier personal views and morals guide them and directly affect thier work environment as we see in this case.

    She should not have put up posters advocating one group over another – that is not the governments job nor should it even be suggestive in what it advertises in the workplace.

  • sayanything-2407

    Apparently, in her view, it is helpful to those who have suffered under thousands of years of embarrassment or societal shame for being gay.

    Ah don’t start withthe thousand years of suffering Hannitized, or Dmeocrats will suddenly be wanting Reparations to give.

    Has it ever occurred to any of you, that their perverse behavior has to do with the fact that they are made to feel that they are not equal and that constantly being told you are perverted is the problem?

    Have to disagree with you there Hannitized.

    YOU and only you have control over your behaviour. No one can MAKE you be or do something you do not wish to do or be.

    I don’t agree it’s societies fault that some gay / lesbians act the way they do. If that was so it would be directly responsible for ALL of them acting the same way – and yet, not all do. Some gay / lesbian people are very nice, and outgoing people. They look just like you or me, they act just like you or me (a hetrosexual person) and you would never know what thier sexual preferences are because they don’t go about flaunting it and pushing it into everyones faces.

    It is not societies fault that some act out this way. Personal responsibility – I believe they act like that in a degree similiar to perez hilton, because they can use thier sexuality preference as as shield to act out.

    I think what she did was brave, and yes, offensive to some. But those people who are offended have had their way for thousands of years and I think our civilization is due for a advancement.

    Sorry, again, don’t agree. I don’t think it was brave, just irresponsible – it is not the job of Government to take sides in sexuality / religon / race / ect.

  • LoadTheMule

    How many times does it need to be said? Read the Constitution, then read the founding fathers: America wasn’t founded so we could all become better. America was found so we could all become whatever we damn well please.

    But then there are others who don’t want the government to define anything for them and simply want to be free to live their lives in the way they see fit.

    Amen, oh Brother-of-the-Wind.

  • Carol

    How about we recognize heterosexual marriages of 40 + years?

  • sayanything-5371

    How much more of this National Embarrassment do we have to endure?

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    Where’s my pride day?

    I am a proud Hasidic-Jedi-Druid-Male-Lesbian…..

    I want posters,
    and confetti,
    and cakes,
    and a parade,
    and and a pony…….

    THEN people will luv me…..

    I feel so left out…….

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Socks. Nor force someone to sin and be gay.

  • Hannitized

    Just about every person in this country is the descendant of one demographic or another that has been enslaved or ethnically cleansed or ill-treated at some point in history.

    Are we all victims? Or should we quit diving ourselves up into victim groups and just stop caring about stuff like that?

    I have always thought your argument that because other things happen in other countries, it is then equal and an exact parallel to what happens in ours, was a bad one.

    In fact, slavery and ethnic cleansing isn’t even relevant to this topic.

    Again, I don’t want a government that picks and chooses which victims are special and worth attention and which aren’t. I want a government that treats everyone the same.

    What’s so wrong with that?

    I didn’t say anything was wrong with it. But at the same time, I don’t see anything wrong with the government giving credibility and possibly a sense of pride when our country has a culture that is robbing them of pride.

    What is wrong with that?

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    I agree with you on the lack of a strict political divide. You hear people on both sides of the aisle complaining about a lack of (or not enough) recognition of “their” racial, sexual or sociopolitical orientation by the government.

    Personally, I can think of quite a few white Christian conservatives that I want absolutely no part of, and frequently resent being associated with.

    Real pride comes with accomplishment, not entitlement.

  • zappatrust

    Shouldn’t we want the government to be blind to things like gender, race, religion and sexual orientation?

    Uh..Yeah..But not anymore, not in Barry’s world. I could be wrong but the vandals are probably more upset about the in your face forced diversity training than acknowledging that some of the co workers are LBGT

  • Wing Chun Geologist

    What about hairy back pride?

    Those of us with masculine bodies have been discriminated against since…well…at least since that effiminate waxed puffas became the norm in hollywood.

    I wantposters celebrating hairy backs, and I want affirmative action for hairy-backed actors and models.

  • Mickey

    I’d like a Heterosexual White Male Amnesty Holiday myself.

    I’m tired of being the scapegoat for all the fringe groups.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Divide and conquer.

  • 11B40

    Greetings:

    I wonder if she had any “glory holes” installed in the men’s rooms, in the spirit of celebration. Or a condom dispenser. Or an AIDs relief collection box.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    It seems to me that it is pretty obvious Rob. The secretary of labor was making a statement.

    Apparently, in her view, it is helpful to those who have suffered under thousands of years of embarrassment or societal shame for being gay.

    Just about every person in this country is the descendant of one demographic or another that has been enslaved or ethnically cleansed or ill-treated at some point in history.

    Are we all victims? Or should we quit diving ourselves up into victim groups and just stop caring about stuff like that?

    Again, I don’t want a government that picks and chooses which victims are special and worth attention and which aren’t. I want a government that treats everyone the same.

    What’s so wrong with that?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development