Who Cares If Rick Perry Tipped The Press About Herman Cain’s Scandal?
It’s not often I agree with Paul Begala, but he’s got it right here:
Herman Cain’s camp can’t seem to figure out which way is up. Midday Thursday, Cain’s campaign manager Mark Block stood down from his accusation that Rick Perry engaged in “despicable” conduct by leaking news of the first story about a sexual harassment complaint against Cain. But later in the day, Cain himself suggested again, this time on Sean Hannity’s radio show, that the Perry camp was behind the story. So which is it? Did Perry’s underlings leak the information?
If they did, it would be the first signs of intelligent life from the underachieving Aggie. What—me defend Rick Perry? Ordinarily I’d be right up there leading the charge against him for despicable behavior. I mean, Perry may have executed an innocent man. He ran an ad against a Latino that many Tejanos considered racist. His conduct in office has been so ethically challenged that even Sarah Palin has accused him of “crony capitalism.” He hugged a preacher who smeared Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith. Despicable indeed.
But none of those things sparked the ire of the Herminator. No, Cain and his team accused Perry of the “despicable” act of leaking information about alleged sexual harassment by Cain.
Since when is it dirty to encourage reporters to commit journalism?
I think it’s fair to have some criticism of the way the media has handled the story – they’ve been shockingly reticent about reporting some of the most pertinent details of the scandal – but if there are allegations of sexual harassment in Cain’s past that’s a legitimate story to chase and whoever may have tipped the media off to it is irrelevant.Tags: election 2012, Herman Cain