White House Focuses On Leaks To The Media

The Washington Post:

The Bush administration, seeking to limit leaks of classified information, has launched initiatives targeting journalists and their possible government sources. The efforts include several FBI probes, a polygraph investigation inside the CIA and a warning from the Justice Department that reporters could be prosecuted under espionage laws.
In recent weeks, dozens of employees at the CIA, the National Security Agency and other intelligence agencies have been interviewed by agents from the FBI’s Washington field office, who are investigating possible leaks that led to reports about secret CIA prisons and the NSA’s warrantless domestic surveillance program, according to law enforcement and intelligence officials familiar with the two cases.
Numerous employees at the CIA, FBI, Justice Department and other agencies also have received letters from Justice prohibiting them from discussing even unclassified issues related to the NSA program, according to sources familiar with the notices. Some GOP lawmakers are also considering whether to approve tougher penalties for leaking.
In a little-noticed case in California, FBI agents from Los Angeles have already contacted reporters at the Sacramento Bee about stories published in July that were based on sealed court documents related to a terrorism case in Lodi, according to the newspaper.

The usual reactionaries are telling us that this threat to jail reporters ought to “scare the hell” out of us, but I think that’s a little misleading. This move is not aimed at prosecuting journalists for reporting leaked information but rather forcing those journalists to turn over information as to who leaked the information in the first place.
That is an important distinction to make.
From my understanding of the law it is not illegal to publish classified government information, even if it is illegally leaked to you by a government official. It is, however, illegal to obstruct an investigation into a crime. The people who leak this information are guilty of a serious crime, and journalists who protect these sources become complicit in that crime when they refuse to cooperate with government investigations.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Steve L.

    Indictments!! I want to see some indictments!!  Until then…

    I want to see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House.

    Wait.  He’s on our side.  Nevermind.

  • http://peatbog.net/ Sphagnum

    Yeah, i thik it’s pretty obvious that at SOME point they ought to be held accountable for passing on information that is obviously damaging to our national security…

    For instance, had the NYT splashed "3 MILLION ALLIED TROOPS TO STORM NOMANDY TOMORROW!" across their front page on June 5th, 1944, there’d have to be some way of holding them accountable for the deaths of American servicemen that would result… 

  • http://peatbog.net/ Sphagnum

    This move is not aimed at prosecuting journalists for reporting leaked information but rather forcing those journalists to turn over information as to who leaked the information in the first place.

    I’m not so sure about that… From Redstate:

     

    The original Espionage Act makes it a crime for a government official with access to national defense information to communicate it intentionally to any unauthorized person. A 1950 amendment broadened the law, forbidding an unauthorized recipient of the information to pass it on. Reporter Eggen characterizes this amendment as being "aimed at Soviet spying," although nothing in the Amendment itself limits its applicability to Soviet spies.

     When it comes to matters of national security, reporters have a DUTY NOT to report informatio that could damage the USA.  If they find out the details of how we are listening in on terrorist phone conversations, the reporter is duty bound not to make that information public.  Both the leaker and the reporter ought to be held accountable for leaking matters of very secret nature regarding national security.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Still, though, I think the Espionage Act is being used more as leverage to get at the actual leakers.  Throwing reporters in jail, however justified, would be a bad PR move for this administration.  I think they should do it if it comes to that, but better to just try and get the leakers.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Steve, in order for that to happen it would have to be proved that something which was actually classified was leaked illegally unde the provisions set out by the law.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Hmm…I wasn’t aware of that amendment.

    Makes sense.  If these reporters are guilty of crimes as well then I see no problem in locking them up. 

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development